TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Catchpoint

Score9.1 out of 10

100 Reviews and Ratings

Learn More

Contact about Catchpoint

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Catchpoint Systems Inc

Connect with Catchpoint Systems Inc

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Catchpoint Systems Inc so that Catchpoint Systems Inc and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Catchpoint Review Powerful Digital Experience Monitoring with Deep Network Insights.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Catchpoint for proactive monitoring of application performance, availability, and user experience. It helps us detect and resolve issues before they impact users, optimize service reliability, and monitor third-party dependencies. Our use case includes synthetic monitoring, real user monitoring (RUM), API monitoring, and cloud/network performance tracking, ensuring seamless digital operations.

Pros

  • Synthetic Monitoring.
  • Real User Monitoring.
  • Network & Cloud Performance Monitoring.
  • Root Cause Analysis & Alerting.

Cons

  • Complex Setup & Configuration.
  • Alerting Noise & Customization.
  • Dashboard Customization & UX.

Return on Investment

  • Reduced Downtime & Faster Incident Resolution.
  • Improved User Experience & Retention.
  • Cost Savings Through Performance Optimization.

Alternatives Considered

New Relic and Datadog

Other Software Used

Atlassian Jira, Nagios XI, OpsGenie

Catchpoint Review

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Catchpoint to conduct transaction/playwright tests, and monitor the performance, by using different nodes across all over the world. We care about around-the-world coverage, and the performance differences. This is how the Catchpoint meets our use case, and we utilize nodes locations, and detail waterfall chart to understand the performance overall.

Pros

  • node location
  • easy to write the script
  • no downtime
  • details of the performance
  • good chart/visualization

Cons

  • Scripts, like transaction and playwright, not stable
  • very easy to fail my case, without legit reason
  • no version control, this is a huge pain point for me
  • lack of organizations of the project

Return on Investment

  • fewer outages
  • very easy to identify the issue of performance bottleneck

Alternatives Considered

Dynatrace

Other Software Used

Dynatrace, Jenkins

Catchpoint for Robust Monitoring

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Catchpoint is used for Synthetic monitoring of internal IT resources from various internal office locations and also for Product observability initiative from various last mile connectivity networks and cloud locations in accessing and using the cloud software products to measure the customer impact, connectivity challenges and product usage challenges. Real User monitoring is out of scope currently and IPM is under deep dive evaluation.

Pros

  • Our standard operating material documents Catchpoint’s breadth on HTTP/Browser, API, Streaming, DNS, FTP, TCP, SMTP, Ping, Traceroute, SSH with content validation and custom widgets/dashboards. This gives SREs and L0/L1 a single place to validate both page flows and the underlying network/application protocols.
  • Product runbooks use Catchpoint to validate critical steps (for ex, login, overview dashboard, unit dashboards) and to detect DNS issues that break those journeys. so we catch experience regressions even when the backend looks healthy.
  • We’ve standardized Catchpoint alert categories/templates with ITSM so L0 includes the right analysis in handoffs. This tightened “first message, best message” during incidents.
  • Our operating procedures use Catchpoint for alwayson availability checks with email notifications and multi‑location verification when a site is down. This is useful for unambiguous “is it up/where is it failing” signals.

Cons

  • Catchpoint excels at realtime monitoring but offers only basic trend analysis. We noted that historical insights and advanced anomaly detection are weak compared to other observability platforms which provide richer forecasting and correlation features. This limits proactive problem prevention and long horizon of capacity planning.
  • Catchpoint does not provide deep application level visibility like code level tracing, log ingestion, or distributed tracing. It is inability to correlate API and frontend failures with backend logs or infrastructure metrics is a challenge. This forces teams to rely on other tools for full stack troubleshooting.
  • Catchpoint lacks AI powered anomaly detection and automated remediation. This gap means more manual triage and slower MTTR during incidents. Internal roadmap discussions flagged this as a strategic limitation for predictive observability.

Return on Investment

  • Catchpoint points based licensing for public hosted nodes is complicated and unpredictable in points required.
  • Catchpoint lacks AI powered anomaly detection and automated remediation. This gap means more manual triage and slower MTTR during incidents.
  • The advanced 360 degree blackbox monitoring is enabling us to monitor the APIs, UI and proactively gain insights into the application behavior and performance before customer is impacted.

Alternatives Considered

Cisco ThousandEyes, Splunk AppDynamics and Dynatrace

Other Software Used

Elasticsearch, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Grafana, VictoriaMetrics Community, Gainsight CS, Gainsight PX, Azure AI Studio, Vertex AI

Catchpoint- the right tool for Synthetic Tests and more

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Catchpoint to perform synthetic checks of different (SasS) platforms in different regions. The business problem that Catchpoint addresses is the observability of a SaaS application from different regions, providing us with a lot of details such as availability, web response time, latency in different regions. If a problem/alert happens, it notifies the specified teams that will start to investigate why the problem/alert was triggered, which helps to minimize the time to get the right people to work and fix a production problem.

Pros

  • Catchpoint is really good at synthetic tests from edge, as it contains checks for DNS resolution, certificate expiration, api monitoring and more.
  • Catchpoint is also good in performance troubleshooting, helping to identify where the slowness is (in my cloud or in my customer ISP) as well as identify where package loss begins/happens.
  • Catchpoint is also good on capturing end-user page load results and present perfomance metrics that helps the engineering teams to identify and solve them properly.
  • The past thing that I know that Catchpoint can do, but I am not using it, is to integrate with my Incident Response Team to help pinpoint the issue quickly. But its something that my team is investigating.

Cons

  • The UI is not very intuitive and requires a few tries to understand where you can find the feature that you are looking for.
  • The performance metrics from synthetic tests are good, but sometimes it provides the wrong information, for example the web response time gets confused with the time of the test is self and I would like to see a report with the URLs that were used per step in the test and web response time that was taken in each one of the URLs, per region.

Return on Investment

  • Positive impact: to identify the web response time per region, and in which URL takes the most to load. That is super important when identifying performance in the UI and fix them.
  • Positive impact: to identify a big latency in one region which was just used a canary to observe its usage/behaviour first, and after a few hours we could see it was not going as expected.

Alternatives Considered

Datadog, New Relic and Checkly

Other Software Used

Datadog

Modern Visibility for Cloud and Internet Stack

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

As a AWS Network Specialist I would say Catchpoint helps in various aspects in organization. Since it has capability for visibility into internet stack which we can say outside of data center visibility. The visualization dashboard is very helpful and able to find out the issue in minutes - where it is broken in our cloud or datacenter or somewhere else. By the enterprise nodes we can get the insights of performance degradation from the Catchpoint even before customers. Also the BGP test cases are very helpful and it will send alerts when there is Hijack and it has good alerting system with detailed analysis in mail. Overall I can say it is very helpful for all organizations that it can see things which we can't.

Pros

  • Dashboards
  • Test Cases we can run
  • Alerting System

Cons

  • Full integration with cloud
  • Creation of Dashboard is time consuming
  • Insights for user experience

Return on Investment

  • Problem Solving
  • Detail understanding
  • Quick Fixes

Alternatives Considered

SolarWinds Access Rights Manager (ARM)

Other Software Used

HashiCorp Terraform, Fortinet FortiGate, GitHub