Everest (Return Path + 250ok)

Score10 out of 10

51 Reviews and Ratings

What is Everest (Return Path + 250ok)?

Everest is an integrated email success platform providing crucial insights and deliverability guidance so users can reach more people, increase engagement, and improve efficiencies of their email programs.

Everest helps to improve email deliverability by getting complete visibility into email marketing metrics and sender reputation, understand the audience and deliver content that is timely, personalized, and functions flawlessly on any device, and get a holistic view of a company's email program with the insights, guidance, and exclusive data you need at your fingertips – all in a single platform.

Everest is built by the combined forces of Return Path, BriteVerify, and 250ok. Bringing together 20+ years of email marketing experience and continuous learning from thousands of customers into a unified platform.

Categories & Use Cases

Media

Inbox Placement
Understand inbox placement rates by mailbox provider.

Competitive Intelligence
Get visibility into what your competitors are doing well, including subject lines, sending patterns, and more.

Design Tests
Collaborate, design, and test your email content across devices and mail clients.

Reputation Monitoring
Get the most visibility into your sender reputation.

Engagement Metrics
Go beyond the basic data provided by your email service provider. Get a holistic look at all the engagement metrics matters to your email program.

List Validation
Verify the addresses on your lists aren't dead, wrong, or dangerous before mailing them and protect your sender reputation.

1 / 6

Spam Testing
Spam testing allows marketers to test their email against most major spam filters before sending out their email campaigns.
Category average: 8.5
Email Previews
This allows marketers to test out emails to see how they will display across multiple different applications and web browsers.
Category average: 9.3
Inbox Display
This allows marketers to see how their emails will be displayed within different web browsers and within different email service provider (ESP) platforms.
Category average: 8.3

Landing pages
Users can create web pages that are customized to a particular email or campaign. Landing pages often include web forms which can capture visitor information and integrate it back into the MA software.
Category average: 7.2
Custom reports
Users can create custom reports.
Category average: 7.3
Mobile optimization
Users can easily optimize emails and landing pages for mobile devices.
Category average: 8.3

Akande Davis View profile

Growth Marketing Strategist in Marketing at Digital Pew (1001-5000 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Everest (Return Path + 250ok) within our organization to focus on upping deliverability, cleaning up our lists and sender reputation, and becoming more familiar with how our emails are performing within individual email inboxes and email providers. We also use the platform to test out our email design and what is working/not working and what could be flagged as a spam issue.

Pros

List validation
Design testing
Inbox placement

Cons

Onboarding process with reps
Upstart timeline for new customer
Clearer instruction for each module

Return on Investment

Better deliverability
Cleaner lists
Fewer spam traps

Alternatives Considered

Litmus

Mark Robert Anderson View profile

Senior Salesforce Automation Manager in Information Technology at GoCo Group (201-500 employees employees)

Pros

IP reputation insights
Consulting and advice
Inbox placement insights

Cons

Using more of their tools.

Return on Investment

Clear insight into inbox placement.
Visibility on individual ESP reactions and reputations.
Reduction in negative stats such as Microsoft SRD.
Clean, secure and reputable IP strength across the board.

Jessica Porter

Email and SMS Director in Manufacturing at Democratic National Committee (51-200 employees employees)

Pros

In-depth data on user engagement with email campaigns
Spam and design testing for a huge number of email clients
Detailed deliverability tracking and support

Cons

Slow and somewhat sticky migration progress

Return on Investment

A consistent platform to track our deliverability and performance

Brett Schenker View profile

Email Deliverability Specialist in Customer Service at NGP VAN (201-500 employees employees)

Pros

Inbox Placement measurement
Deliverability by domain
Clues as to possible causes of deliverability issues

Cons

There's some data that their sister company ReturnPath has that they're missing

Return on Investment

Increases the ease to identify deliverability issues
Helps save time resolving problems
Easy alerting to raise awareness of what's going on

Alternatives Considered

Return Path

Kevin Hickey View profile

Senior Manager, Marketing Automation & Personalization in Marketing at Carters Inc. (10,001+ employees employees)

Pros

Sender certification
Inbox monitoring
ISP remediation

Cons

ESP integration
Customer reporting

Return on Investment

Increased inbox placement
IP optimization
Increased OR/CTR

Kickbox

MailMonitor

GlockApps

Everest (Return Path + 250ok)

What is Everest (Return Path + 250ok)?

Categories & Use Cases

Media

Key Features

Top Performing Features

Spam Testing

Email Previews

Inbox Display

Areas for Improvement

Landing pages

Custom reports

Mobile optimization

Reviews