BitBar

• Screenshots
• Layout Differences on the Screenshots section

• It has allowed us to test 5+ browsers at a time, saving us 2-3hrs on each site.

• Having a platform to actually test devices.
• Screenshots
• Mobile debugging

• I would say mostly positive for the service they offer
• Negative is how much time you will need to do this testing

BrowserStack

Cascade Server, Adobe PhotoShop, Cyberduck

We used CrossBrowserTesting to ensure that any new pages for our website or emails that we are sending as part of a campaign display properly amongst a wide range of devices/browsers. Since my company was global, our userbase reached the site in many different ways, and it was important that we provided a great experience for everyone.

• Many device/browser testing options.
• If a particular test case fails, screenshots are taken so that we can make appropriate fixes.
• The interface is straightforward and easy to learn quickly.

• Reduced customer/visitor frustration from issues with website on their device/browser.
• Keeps the entire team on the same page with respect to what devices/browsers we are testing on.
• Allows us to deliver a higher quality site with less time spent on QA/UAT.

Litmus

Semrush, Ahrefs, seoClarity

CrossBrowserTesting was used to test our UIs by running manual, visual, and Selenium Tests in the cloud. We relied on the results of this tool to see the compatibility of our interfaces, especially in mobile screens, and also continuously test with CI/CD integrations.

• Automate visual testing for a pixel perfect rendering on every screen.
• Compare screenshots across browsers.
• Automatically share test results with stakeholders.

• By using CrossBrowserTesting we are saving many hours a week in manual work hours.
• Our automated Selenium tests run in a fraction of the time it takes to manually test our components, so we can spend more time building great user experiences and less time triaging bugs.

Applause

I used this product as part of testing my product on multiple devices, environments. I used it for testing web application and mobile application. Using CrossBrowserTesting tool it was easier to test on multiple (versions of) browser and devices, which was helpful for our business as it was being used by Field Engineers in hospitals.

• Device/Browser coverage
• Ease of use and easy to learn for person with no experience
• Live Testing environment
• Cloud connectivity
• Integration with multiple frameworks

• Coverage
• Cloud Connectivity
• Easy to use
• Live Testing
• Integration with multiple frameworks

Selenium

Selenium, Postman, Micro Focus UFT One (formerly HP UFT)