LambdaTest

Score8.6 out of 10

171 Reviews and Ratings

What is LambdaTest?

LambdaTest is a Quality Engineering Platform that offers a full-stack testing cloud with 10K+ real devices and over 3,000 browsers for cross-browser and end-to-end testing.

With AI-native test management, MCP servers, and agent-based automation, LambdaTest supports Selenium, Appium, Playwright, and all major frameworks. AI Agents like HyperExecute and KaneAI bring AI and cloud into test workflows, enabling automation testing with 100+ integrations. From infrastructure to execution, LambdaTest Agents helps improve testing across the entire SDLC.

Categories & Use Cases

Media

Screenshot of automation testing on Lambdatest

Screenshot of some of the available integrations.

1 / 10

Screenshot of an automated screenshot

#1 most frequent

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

28.7%

87 installations of 303

“As a system manager of our testing team,I managed various testing product for our daily testing purpose like cross browser testing,web testing,mobile testing etc. LambdaTest one of the finest testing application I used ever.it is a cloud based cross browser testing platform which allow to test various kind of applications accros diffent browsers,operating system and devices.it provide both the environment for manual and automated testing.help our organization to manage all types of testing.”

#2 most frequent

Information

19.1%

58 installations of 303

#3 most frequent

Retail Trade

5.6%

17 installations of 303

Ajay Rabari View profile

Shopify Developer in Engineering at Zestard Technologies (11-50 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use LambdaTest to test our Shopify apps and SaaS web applications. We test custom Shopify app blocks and embedded Shopify app pages. We ensure that our user experience is not disrupted and that the functionalities of our Shopify apps are working properly for our users.LambdaTest saves time and cost for our QA process.

Pros

Custom Shopify app blocks
App embedded pages
Websites

Cons

Live browser sessions can be improved in terms of performance.
The accuracy of real device behavior can be better.
More advanced debugging tools would be helpful for troubleshooting issues during live testing.

Return on Investment

LambdaTest has helped us reduce both testing time and cost
It has allowed us to run fewer QA cycles while enabling faster deployments.
Our ROI has improved significantly by using LambdaTest.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

GitHub, Postman, Sublime Text

Rohit Sharma

Web Developer in Engineering at Bubba Ai (51-200 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

The best thing about LambdaTest is its real-time device testing, which helps identify specific errors on multiple devices, issues that are hard to detect at once due to limited device availability.The main problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.

Pros

Multiple Devices of all types available at one place
Give Inspect element inside the testing environment
Ontime support which helps to solve any kind of issue on the platform

Cons

The very first thing is they have to increase the free testing time to 10 minutes per device to actually see the use of the product
The every device usage should limit to atleast 2 times per user to actually see the detailed view for the problem or any issues on the testing

Return on Investment

Fewer device issues compared to when I wasn't using the platform.
Faster delivery of tasks to our clients.
The bounce rates on different devices are significantly lower because we release the website or app more frequently on the platform to check for any issues.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

BrowserStack

Danish Amin View profile

Senior Full Stack Developer in Engineering at Amperative (11-50 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use it for cross browser testing, testing mobile apps both ios and android on a wide variety of devices, before LambdaTest, we relied on different platforms but they were lacking in many features, api integration to third party apps like mattermost has been like a cherry on cake, as a reactnative dev this has become an important platform to use on daily basis

Pros

Virtual mobile Testing
Cross Browser Testing
Automation

Cons

5 should change to 10 minute free session
Device boot speed is fair can be better

Return on Investment

Time Saving
Cost Saving

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack and Browserling

Other Software Used

Mattermost, Xcode, Android Studio

hardik panchal

Quality Assurance Engineer in Information Technology at Technobot System Pvt Ltd (11-50 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I used LambdaTest as a tester to test the product on different virtual devices. Which helps me to understand about how I can enhance the user experience of the product. Due to it cross browsing functionality I can test my product performance under different browser including to their version under one roof. Which is one of the great things I have seen and used so far. One of my biggest business problems has been resolved to create awareness in front of my clients about the actual product performance and visualization. Which creates trust and confidence in front of my client towards me and also motivates me to do such good work.

Pros

It provides a virtual device that acts as an actual device resolution. Due to that anyone can take a feel of how their product will behave and enact without using actual devices.
Another example is that it also provides a virtual browser with their latest version which helps to analysed the performance of the product.

Cons

As per my experience i would like to say about the performance issue specially when switching the device virtually
Another one which i would like to say about it like session timeout it occurs so quickly if person is inactive while watching and understanding the scenarios
One of the key issue which i feel is that about the documentation which sometimes maybe outdate or not provide the in depth info for automation features

Return on Investment

One of the positive impacts it creates on my business is like reducing my testing time from 3 days to 1 day of the sprint cycle.
Another it reduces my cost of infrastructure in terms of real device to test the product. Which is also one of the positive notes for me.
One of the negative points or impacts created on my workflow is like me another team member has to wait for the test session due to the plan limitation.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

BrowserStack, Katalon, TestRail

Syeda Sufiya Parveen

Sr QA Lead in Information Technology at Sakosoft (1001-5000 employees employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We had execution environment issues for multi-environment on our Automation test framework that's where LT's Hyper-execute introduced to run regression on the different environments. As soon as our QA team commit the code, Hyper execute is automatically triggers and starts execution based on the Environment and Browsers and when the execution gets completed report is generated with result. It has the dashboard where quickly user can filter out the failed test and analyze for the fixes to be done

Pros

Parallel Execution
Reporting dashboard
Huge Device support
Platforms like Android, iOS versions

Cons

Improve Support to resolve issues quickly

Return on Investment

ROI is around 65% when compared to the traditional automated execution in our org, drastically the time is saved due to parallel execution

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Sauce Labs

LambdaTest

What is LambdaTest?

Categories & Use Cases

Media

Most Frequent Users

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Information

Retail Trade

Reviews

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Other Software Used

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Other Software Used

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Other Software Used

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Other Software Used

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Cons

Return on Investment

Usability

Alternatives Considered

Related Products