BitBar Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 7 out of 10

Score

7 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for BitBar are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Clean and User-Friendly Interface: Users have found the user interface of the product to be clean and user-friendly, making it easy for them to navigate and efficiently use. This has been stated by several reviewers, highlighting the positive experience they had with the intuitive design.

Convenient Testing on Development Server: The ability to test on their development server, even if it is behind a firewall, has been highly appreciated by users. This feature provides convenience and ease of use, allowing them to perform testing without any restrictions or additional setup.

Time-Saving Test Automation: Many users have expressed their appreciation for the product's automation capabilities. Being able to automate tests using the product saves time and effort for reviewers, enabling them to streamline their testing process effectively.

Reviews

6 Reviews

A tool you need for testing on the web

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

January 11, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

CrossBrowserTesting was used to test our UIs by running manual, visual, and Selenium Tests in the cloud. We relied on the results of this tool to see the compatibility of our interfaces, especially in mobile screens, and also continuously test with CI/CD integrations.

Pros

Test Continuously With CI/CD Integrations.
Selenium and Appium test automation.
Generate multiple screenshots of the same interface from different devices, operating systems, and browsers at once.
Run visual comparisons of the same web page on the same browser or mobile device from a previous test session.
Show layout differences.

Cons

Relatively slow.
Expensive.

Likelihood to Recommend

CrossBrowserTesting was implemented to ensure our website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base.

Verified User

Administrator (1-10 employees)

Vetted Review

1 year of experience

Best testing coverage tool - CBT

Rating: 7 out of 10

Incentivized

January 10, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I used this product as part of testing my product on multiple devices, environments. I used it for testing web application and mobile application. Using CrossBrowserTesting tool it was easier to test on multiple (versions of) browser and devices, which was helpful for our business as it was being used by Field Engineers in hospitals.

Pros

Can test on deal devices , virtually
Coverage
Ease of use
Licensed so secure
Live testing option
Faster Testing

Cons

Taking screenshot
Screen layouts
Some times switching devices/browsers makes usage slower

Likelihood to Recommend

<b>Well Suited:</b>

1. Real devices (virtually) at single places

2. Coverage

3. Ease of use

4. Live Testing

5. Quickly checking/verification of issue on multiple places in less time

<b>Less Appropriate:

</b>1. Slower while using

2. Screen layout - Landscape , Portrait switch

3. Cloud connectivity can be improved

Verified User

Employee in Information Technology (10,001+ employees)

Vetted Review

1 year of experience

An excellent testing product at a fair price

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

January 7, 2022

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use CrossBrowserTesting to do exactly what its name says - cross-browser testing of our website across multiple browsers, versions of browsers, operating systems, screen resolutions, and mobile devices. It allows us to do both regression testing as well as integration smoke tests. We particularly like the ability to do interactive tests for new features.

Pros

Screenshots
Mobile devices
Regression tests

Cons

API automation
Integration with GitHub Actions

Likelihood to Recommend

It's excellent for manual testing, developer validation, and QA servers. We also find it's helpful for reproducing bugs in production, particularly when it's done by a user who has a different operating system. We also use it to quickly spin up interactive desktops to handle potentially harmful customer service requests that might attempt to install malware.

Verified User

C-Level Executive in Product Management (51-200 employees)

Vetted Review

10 years of experience

Quick and Fast Testing

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

July 13, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We run every site through CrossBrowerTesting before we launch the site into production. It helps us find UI and layout errors quickly on different browsers. It also helps us track down bugs that our clients are having that we can not test because they are using an older version of a browser or OS. We can pinpoint the exact browser and OS they are using and solve the bug relatively quickly.

Pros

Find layout errors on web sites quickly
Testing multiple browsers at once
Helps us determine if a bug is world wide or just a cacheing error

Cons

There is nothing that I can think of.

Likelihood to Recommend

A client came saying they are having layout errors on the site but we are not seeing the same thing. After a bit of research, we found that the client was using an older version of a browser. We were able to test on that exact browser the client was having the problem on and see the same problem. Which helped us find a solution to the layout error on the older browser.

Nathan Schmidt

Senior Web Developer in Marketing at NerdyMind Marketing (1-10 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

CrossBrowserTesting Hit or Miss

Rating: 7 out of 10

Incentivized

June 14, 2021

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

CrossBrowserTesting is used solely by me in my department which is Communication/PR. I am a Front-end Developer and I maintain multiple websites for our Nursing school. Testing these sites for mobile and responsiveness overall is not an easy task but I am very grateful there is a product like this to help me.

Pros

Allows me to test on our development server with ease which is behind a firewall.
Using automation for my tests.
Screenshots of the problems on each page.
Ability to jump between screen sizes quickly.

Cons

Testing on each mobile device can be very slow to load
Does not seem to keep the mobile device list as updated as i would like
When comparing their results to my actual phone the results do not match
Mobile debugger talk forever to load and is slightly clunky to use

Likelihood to Recommend

It is very helpful for testing a site for desktop sizes, resolutions, and OS. Mobile results are hit or miss. If you need to test something quickly then you are out of luck.

Deborah Thayer

Front-end Web Developer/Designer at University of Rochester SON (201-500 employees)

Vetted Review

3 years of experience

View profile

Loading Reviews List....

Home
,
Cross-Browser Testing
,
BitBar
,
Reviews and Ratings