TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

LambdaTest

Score8.6 out of 10

171 Reviews and Ratings

What is LambdaTest?

Read more details.

Categories & Use Cases

Media

Screenshot of an automated screenshot
Screenshot of mobile-browser-testing
Screenshot of automation testing on Lambdatest
Screenshot of some of the available integrations.
Screenshot of real-time testing
Screenshot of responsive testing
Screenshot of screenshot testing
Screenshot of smart testing
Screenshot of local host testing
Screenshot of LT Browser

1 / 10

Screenshot of an automated screenshot

Who Buys & Uses LambdaTest

Most Frequent Users

Top 3 industries using LambdaTest.

Based on HG Insights installation data
Powered by
View all Reviews
#1 most frequent

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

25.1%

177 installations of 704

“Due to it cross browsing functionality I can test my product performance under different browser including to their version under one roof. Which is one of the great things I have seen and used so far.”

— Quality Assurance Engineer, Technobot System Pvt Ltd
Verified Review
#2 most frequent

Information

17.2%

121 installations of 704

“We use it for cross browser testing, testing mobile apps both ios and android on a wide variety of devices, before LambdaTest, we relied on different platforms but they were lacking in many features, api integration to third party apps like mattermost has been like a cherry on cake, as a reactnative dev this has become an important platform to use on daily basis”

— Senior Full Stack Developer, Amperative
Verified Review
#3 most frequent

Finance and Insurance

9.5%

67 installations of 704

LambdaTest Reviews

What users are saying about LambdaTest.
View all LambdaTest reviews

Pros

  • Extensive cross-browser and cross-platform compatibility testing
  • Real device testing on a wide range of Android and iOS devices with real-time logs
  • Significant cost savings by reducing the need for physical testing infrastructure

Cons

  • Performance and speed issues, including slow loading times and lag during live sessions
  • Inconsistent mobile device testing experience, with slow real device loading and scrolling issues
  • Limited availability of real-time devices during peak usage periods

Seamless Experience in Mobile Testing

Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (10,001+ employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I have used LambdaTest for Real time Mobile testing and Mobile Automation. It is great experience, user-friendly and we can test Android, iOS and iPad. We can reach out to the support team for any kind of help/issues. They are responding in no time and assisting better. We can also trigger automation and we can watch the live mobile screen when we are executing which is great. We can get to know if the test is running or failing for any reason. If we want to check any locator during run time, we have the option to detect the locator during run time. Overall, it's amazing to use LambdaTest and no big issues faced. For configration related and clarity related, I have raised a support ticket. They assisted me quickly and resolved.

Pros

  • We can test android, iOS and iPad along with different version
  • We can take screenshot and screen recording during real time mobile automation which is helpful for documentation and error reporting
  • We can also trigger automation and we can watch the live mobile screen when we are executing which is great
  • Parallel Executions possible

Cons

  • QR/ Bar Code Scanner functionality
  • Interactive with Screens for uploaded apps during runtime
  • Sometimes It is hard to use Web page Locators inside Mobile

Return on Investment

  • We can test our own app which is used by our internal
  • A lot of time saving and efficient with no much tech knowledge
  • We can capture images just like real devices which is great

Usability

LambdaTest Review

Verified User
Engineer in Engineering (10,001+ employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

LambdaTest proved very helpful for testing products across multiple virtual devices and browsers. The cross-browser and cross-device functionality made it easier to evaluate real-world behavior and demonstrate accurate product performance to clients, which improved client trust and boosted confidence in delivered work.Use cases and deployment scopeUsed as a tester to validate product behavior on different virtual devices and browser versions under one roof.Applied for mobile app testing on Android and iOS using real devices provided on the platform.Valuable for demonstrating real product visualization and performance to clients, helping to communicate issues and improvements effectively.

Pros

  • Virtual devices replicate real device resolutions and behaviors, enabling realistic testing without needing physical devices.
  • Virtual browsers with up-to-date versions allow performance and compatibility analysis across browser releases.

Cons

  • Deep, low-level debugging can be harder remotely

Return on Investment

  • Significant cost savings from avoiding large device inventories.
  • Helps build client trust by demonstrating real-world product behavior.

Usability

Other Software Used

BrowserStack, ClickUp, Slack

Honest Opinion for LambdaTest why should you use it

Verified User
Engineer in Engineering (10,001+ employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

As we are a product based company, therefore to thoroughly test our Frontend application, we use LambdaTest. LambdaTest offers testing of application on all types of devices thus ensuring the product quality. The speed of execution of UI Automation suites in LambdaTest is very efficient with minimum drops in network.

Pros

  • Emulators : Speed of execution is Awesome
  • Network Connectivity : Very smooth/minimal lags/drops
  • All Types of features available, Remote browsing of reports as well

Cons

  • Can add more devices as per the organisations are taking in use
  • Can introduce parallel execution of test cases
  • Local Testing can also be made easier while executions

Return on Investment

  • Quality of the Product is ensured thus ROI is high.
  • Company Specific devices in use, if would have been present then would be much better.
  • Manual Efforts & Speed of execution is high thus ROI is high

Usability

I use LambdaTest to test my Shopify apps

Ajay RabariView profile
Shopify Developer in Engineering at Zestard Technologies (11-50 employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use LambdaTest to test our Shopify apps and SaaS web applications. We test custom Shopify app blocks and embedded Shopify app pages. We ensure that our user experience is not disrupted and that the functionalities of our Shopify apps are working properly for our users.LambdaTest saves time and cost for our QA process.

Pros

  • Custom Shopify app blocks
  • App embedded pages
  • Websites

Cons

  • Live browser sessions can be improved in terms of performance.
  • The accuracy of real device behavior can be better.
  • More advanced debugging tools would be helpful for troubleshooting issues during live testing.

Return on Investment

  • LambdaTest has helped us reduce both testing time and cost
  • It has allowed us to run fewer QA cycles while enabling faster deployments.
  • Our ROI has improved significantly by using LambdaTest.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

GitHub, Postman, Sublime Text

One of the best testing tools out there when it comes to real-time analysis

Incentivized
Rohit Sharma
Web Developer in Engineering at Bubba Ai (51-200 employees)

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

The best thing about LambdaTest is its real-time device testing, which helps identify specific errors on multiple devices, issues that are hard to detect at once due to limited device availability.The main problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.

Pros

  • Multiple Devices of all types available at one place
  • Give Inspect element inside the testing environment
  • Ontime support which helps to solve any kind of issue on the platform

Cons

  • The very first thing is they have to increase the free testing time to 10 minutes per device to actually see the use of the product
  • The every device usage should limit to atleast 2 times per user to actually see the detailed view for the problem or any issues on the testing

Return on Investment

  • Fewer device issues compared to when I wasn't using the platform.
  • Faster delivery of tasks to our clients.
  • The bounce rates on different devices are significantly lower because we release the website or app more frequently on the platform to check for any issues.

Usability

Alternatives Considered

BrowserStack

Other Software Used

BrowserStack

LambdaTest Alternatives

Products similar to LambdaTest that may also meet your needs.
View all LambdaTest alternatives
BrowserStack
CompareLearn more
Sauce Labs
CompareLearn more
BitBar
CompareLearn more
Browsershots
CompareLearn more
Browserling
CompareLearn more