Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 8.8 out of 10

Score

8.8 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Template Configuration Simplifies Setup: Users have consistently praised the template-based configuration for its ability to streamline setup processes and ensure uniformity across their networks. They find it intuitive and efficient, saving time during initial deployment.

Optimized Network Performance: Many reviewers have emphasized the significance of the load-balancing feature between ISPs, which plays a crucial role in optimizing network performance and bolstering reliability. This feature is particularly valuable in dynamic network environments with varying traffic loads.

Unified Platform for Management: Customers highly appreciate centralized management as it effectively reduces complexity in network administration and offers a cohesive platform for configuration and monitoring tasks. The centralized approach enhances visibility and control over the entire network infrastructure.

Reviews

116 Reviews

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Review

Rating: 5 out of 10

Incentivized

June 16, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I guess for the intent of it was just to centralize the management as the network scales. Like we used to just send out templates for things and now it's just an easier way to standardize everything across the board, whether they're local or remote.

Pros

I think it does pretty well of tying in multiple transports, allowing you to build a template and baseline for multiple, I guess lack of better term sites, so simplified deployments, stuff like that.

Cons

We're still trying to figure out how to make it work. Some issues that we were running into is just like the user interface. A good example is your configuration templates and deployment groups. Making a group for a specific thing. I'm not trying to get too much into specifics, but you would have a group for remote sites say that one remote site has some sort of requirement that a site, another site may not have a requirement, but if I make a CLI configuration change in that template, it applies to all the templates. So maybe something that didn't apply to that certain site. I don't need it deployed across all sites. So I think a really cool thing would be, if you have multiple devices in one group, maybe it would be good to, if I were able to select which sites would receive the change versus hey, I'm going to make a site that applies, make a change that applies to one site. I don't want to deploy to all sites or have that become part of the template. It was just the one case scenario.

Likelihood to Recommend

We've used it for less than a year and I think we're still doing testing, so I don't know if I would go and say a 10 for recommendation yet. I just haven't seen it in action for a good period amount of time.

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

1 year of experience

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Review

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

June 16, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Used for connectivity between all of our locations, branches, data centers and cloud environments.

We were able to remove expensive private line circuits, provide more bandwidth to our locations and reduce outages.

We use this product at 60 offices, 2 data centers and 4 cloud environments.

Pros

Reduces cost
Improve reliability
Ease of use
Increased flexibility

Cons

GUI slowness, failures, formatting
Licensing
Lack of CLI

Likelihood to Recommend

Well suited to all of our use-cases.

Robert Falconer

Network Architect in Information Technology at Littler (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

3 years of experience

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

June 16, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use it to control the overlay of our campus WAN. It allows us to cchange routes efficiently and dynamically for our brancch offices to load-balance effectivly to our application and edge datacenters.

Pros

Templating
Deployment
Overlay Routing

Cons

Alerting to 3rd Party platforms
Fix the delay of DIA fallback (such as MPLS to hub) in in dual-router sites. Currently there is a very long time for router 1 to understand router2 has lost its circuit and must reroute back to the overlay to the edge datacenter

Likelihood to Recommend

Its well suited if you have the money honestly. It is not a cheap product by any means but can help you scale fast.

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

Learn Learn Learn Then Deploy

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

June 15, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

It's allowing us to solve for deploying spoke networks and infrastructure management.

Pros

Eases deployment of WAN spokes
Helps provide monitoring tools directly from GUI rather than using 3rd-party SNMP applications
Allows for group policy manage and centralized management of your domain

Cons

Some of that route leaking within a domain

Likelihood to Recommend

Mainly just my experience with that product itself but depending on the application, would recommend.

Verified User

Supervisor in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees)

Vetted Review

1 year of experience

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN review

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

June 15, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

we use Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN for branch connectivity. solves issues with multiple transports and load balancing, adds resiliency.

Pros

user experience
branch redundancy
ease of configuration

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is a good system, works with our infrastructure

Jeff Garden

AVP Network Engineering in Engineering at Dollar Bank (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

6 years of experience

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN- in work

Rating: 7 out of 10

Incentivized

June 15, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN one configuration center and monitor.

Pros

centralize configuration
WAN routing

Cons

simplify configuration
get better UI
Rid of bugs in SDWAN routing SW

Likelihood to Recommend

Internet access - successor of DMVPN

Verified User

Consultant in Engineering (10,001+ employees)

Vetted Review

6 years of experience

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN review

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

June 13, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We implemented Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN about 2 years ago for our customer, the product support and technical expertise was great. Before deciding to go ahead with the Cisco solution, we tested many vendors and use cases and we found Cisco as the best overall option and more robust.

We were able to migrate the customer WAN solution to utilize internet connectivity.

Pros

Supports complex solutions

Cons

Continue evolving with the new WAN and Fabric solutions

Likelihood to Recommend

Great support

Verified User

Program Manager in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees)

Vetted Review

22 years of experience

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Review

Rating: 5 out of 10

Incentivized

February 27, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use it to interconnect our branches and steer traffic over the best path from one branch to another or from the branch to the headquarter. And also maximize our, I mean, not maximize, but have less expenses on the transport we use because some stuff it's cheaper to send over the internet. Others, it's cheaper to send over the MPLS and there lot the variations there. And this is where Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN is the one actually helps us out because some traffic also can be sent straight to the cloud and just do not use expensive circuits.

Pros

The initial setup and building the whole infrastructure. It's like this.

Cons

I would think app based routing and I think that is app based that would need more improving and more apps to be identified and actually to be able to make decisions based on those apps and those apps.

Likelihood to Recommend

The best case, what I recommend to others and to clients to use is Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN one for is the case when you have a huge number of branches or small offices or remote offices, you name it. Even home offices, you have a large number and you want this whole infrastructure to be extremely easy to set up and also to have everything almost the same, not to have deviations from the standard configuration. This is the sweet spot for introducing Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN.

Verified User

Consultant in Information Technology (51-200 employees)

Vetted Review

3 years of experience

Cisco SD-WAN Review

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

February 25, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Configured the routers and use these templates and it's connection between the headquarters and store works.

Pros

Hope this application or routing will work fine after the implementation in the next few months. But for what it's already doing, it's stable.

Cons

This application routing, which is on the scope for this year. Better visibility.

Likelihood to Recommend

We use SD-WAN for all locations or multiple sites and it works. Multiple retail environment, stores and sites, it works.

Verified User

Administrator in Information Technology (5001-10,000 employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN review

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

February 13, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Our company have around 300 sites all around the world and still opening new ones. Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN help us to reduce cost of internet connection and uses bot lines at the same time. We also have connection with AWS and Azure.

Pros

"Load balancing" wan traffic
Maintaining configuration templates
Presenting WAN statistics

Cons

Config diff available from GUI

Likelihood to Recommend

Our users reported problems with Teams traffic, thanks AAR we improved it.

Verified User

Engineer in Engineering (501-1000 employees)

Vetted Review

2 years of experience

Loading Reviews List....

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Review

Rating: 5 out of 10

Incentivized

June 16, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

I think it does pretty well of tying in multiple transports, allowing you to build a template and baseline for multiple, I guess lack of better term sites, so simplified deployments, stuff like that.

Cons

We're still trying to figure out how to make it work. Some issues that we were running into is just like the user interface. A good example is your configuration templates and deployment groups. Making a group for a specific thing. I'm not trying to get too much into specifics, but you would have a group for remote sites say that one remote site has some sort of requirement that a site, another site may not have a requirement, but if I make a CLI configuration change in that template, it applies to all the templates. So maybe something that didn't apply to that certain site. I don't need it deployed across all sites. So I think a really cool thing would be, if you have multiple devices in one group, maybe it would be good to, if I were able to select which sites would receive the change versus hey, I'm going to make a site that applies, make a change that applies to one site. I don't want to deploy to all sites or have that become part of the template. It was just the one case scenario.

Likelihood to Recommend

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)

Vetted Review

1 year of experience