TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

BrowserStack Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Reviews & Insights

Score8.6 out of 10

443 Reviews and Ratings

Try for free

Contact about BrowserStack

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

BrowserStack

Connect with BrowserStack

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with BrowserStack so that BrowserStack and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Top industries

Based on 4,841 HG Insights installations.

Powered by
#1 most frequent

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

25.7%

1,242 installations of 4,841

First of all device testing was nearly impossible as buying each device and maintaining it cost a lot and it was too time-consuming to switch different devices as having a bigger team device quantity felt less as everyone wanted to test their respective task and there comes BrowserStack who came up with multiple users and with bunch of devices virtually.

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Community Insights for BrowserStack

Based on 8 verified reviews from Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.


Synthesised from 8 reviews


This analysis focuses on feedback from 8 users in the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services industry. These firms, often engaged in specialized consulting, research, or design work, face unique challenges in software testing due to the diversity of projects, need for precise results, and tight budget constraints. A key theme is the challenge of device compatibility, with 3 reviewers mentioning difficulties in testing across various devices before adopting BrowserStack. The cost of maintaining a physical device lab was also a concern, noted by 2 reviewers.


  • For Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services firms, ensuring consistent website and application behavior across various browsers and devices is critical for maintaining data integrity and user experience. Six of the eight reviewers specifically mention using BrowserStack for cross-browser and device compatibility testing, highlighting its role in eliminating the need for physical devices. This is particularly relevant for firms that need to guarantee accessibility across a wide range of platforms, including mobile devices.
  • Automation testing is a key concern for Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services, where efficiency and accuracy are paramount. Four of the eight reviewers specifically cited using BrowserStack for automation testing, especially parallel testing, which helps to accelerate the testing process. The ability to integrate BrowserStack into existing codebases is also valuable, reducing the learning curve and streamlining the implementation process for these firms.
  • For Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services firms, cross-browser testing is crucial for delivering consistent user experiences across diverse platforms, especially when providing web-based tools or services to clients. Ensuring compatibility minimizes support requests and maintains a professional image. The ability to test across multiple browsers is essential for meeting client expectations and maintaining service level agreements.
  • Automation testing is particularly valuable for Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services companies as it enables them to efficiently validate complex workflows and calculations. This is crucial for maintaining accuracy and reliability in their deliverables. By automating tests, these firms can reduce the risk of errors and ensure the quality of their services.
  • Mobile device testing is increasingly important for Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services firms as they develop and deploy mobile applications for both internal use and client-facing services. Ensuring compatibility across a wide range of devices and operating systems is essential for providing a seamless user experience. This capability allows these firms to address the diverse needs of their clients and employees who rely on mobile technology.
  • For Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services firms, ensuring compatibility across a wide range of devices is critical due to the diverse client base and project requirements. The need to deliver consistent results across different platforms can be a major challenge, especially when dealing with limited resources. Three of the eight reviewers specifically cited device compatibility as a problem they faced prior to using BrowserStack.
  • For Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services firms, performance and speed are critical as delays can directly impact project timelines and client deliverables. Slow loading times or lag can disrupt testing workflows, potentially leading to missed deadlines or compromised quality, factors that can erode client trust and impact profitability. Three of the eight reviewers mentioned performance issues.
  • Effective reporting is crucial for Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services to track testing progress, identify issues, and demonstrate quality assurance to clients. An unintuitive UI or inadequate reporting features can hinder these processes, increasing the time and effort required to manage testing workflows. Three reviewers expressed a need for improvements in these areas.
  • The cost of procuring and maintaining a comprehensive device lab can be prohibitive for Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services firms, especially smaller consultancies or research teams. The need to constantly update devices to reflect market trends adds to the financial burden. Two of the eight reviewers explicitly mentioned the high cost of real devices as a challenge they faced.
  • Cost is a significant factor for Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services firms, particularly smaller teams or individual consultants working on project-based contracts. High pricing or inflexible plans can make BrowserStack less attractive compared to more affordable or scalable alternatives. Two reviewers specifically mentioned concerns about the pricing.
What challenges did you or your organization experience prior to using BrowserStack?

From 8 reviews

This analysis focuses on feedback from 8 users in the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services industry. These firms, often engaged in specialized consulting, research, or design work, face unique challenges in software testing due to the diversity of projects, need for precise results, and tight budget constraints. A key theme is the challenge of device compatibility, with 3 reviewers mentioning difficulties in testing across various devices before adopting BrowserStack. The cost of maintaining a physical device lab was also a concern, noted by 2 reviewers.

Device compatibility challenges

First of all device testing was nearly impossible as buying each device and maintaining it cost a lot and it was too time-consuming to switch different devices as having a bigger team device quantity felt less as everyone wanted to test their respective task and there comes BrowserStack who came up with multiple users and with bunch of devices virtually.

Cost of real devices

We were using physical device which was very costly to procure and maintain. We had to invest every time new devices get released in the market for Accessibility testing and for each project cost for procuring was high and unmanageable.

What are BrowserStack's most important features for you or your organization?

From 8 reviews

This analysis reflects the experiences of a small sample of Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services professionals using BrowserStack. These users, often involved in delivering specialized expertise and solutions, value reliability and accuracy in their software testing processes. Two of eight reviewers specifically highlighted the importance of cross-browser testing and automation testing, suggesting a focus on ensuring consistent performance and reducing manual effort in their validation workflows. Mobile device testing also emerged as a notable feature, mentioned by two reviewers, pointing to the increasing need to support diverse mobile platforms and devices in this sector.

Cross-browser testing

cross browsers testing

Automation testing

Automation Testing with Cypress.

Mobile device testing

Mobile testing - various mobile devices, models and OS

What positive or negative impact (i.e. Return on Investment or ROI) has BrowserStack had on your overall business objectives?

From 7 reviews

This analysis reflects the experiences of a small sample (7) of users in the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services industry. These firms, which provide specialized expertise to other businesses, often operate on tight project timelines and budgets, making efficiency and accuracy paramount. The reviews suggest BrowserStack's primary impact is on streamlining testing workflows. Two of the seven reviewers specifically cited improvements in the testing process, highlighting time savings and enhanced communication between development and testing teams. Given the project-based nature of much of the work in this industry, any tool that can demonstrably accelerate development cycles and reduce debugging time is likely to be viewed favorably.

Improved testing process

Saves time while doing cross device testing.

Describe how you use BrowserStack in your organization. What are the business problems the product addresses and what is the scope of your use case?

From 8 reviews

This analysis reflects the experiences of a small sample of 8 reviewers in the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services industry using BrowserStack. These users, likely involved in web and mobile development or quality assurance roles within their firms, highlight the product's value in cross-browser and device testing, automation, and mobile app testing. A key theme is the elimination of the need for physical devices, which translates to cost savings and broader device coverage for testing, particularly important for firms needing to ensure accessibility across diverse platforms. Given the industry's reliance on accurate and reliable data presentation, BrowserStack's ability to ensure UI consistency across different environments is valuable. The ability to integrate into existing automation frameworks is also a plus.

Cross-browser and device testing

I use BrowserStack in my organization to check the UI of the different websites on different OS and smartphones like iPhone/Android, Macbook, and Windows different browsers.

Automation testing

Earlier. was facing issues n doing automation testing in multiple devices in parallel. It is easy to integrate in our existing code and do the testing.

Mobile app testing

We mainly use BrowserStack for compatibility and accessibility testing on different browsers and mobile devices. Thanks to BrowserStack, we don’t need physical devices for compatibility testing.

Please provide some detailed examples of areas where BrowserStack has room for improvement.

From 8 reviews

This analysis reflects the experiences of a small sample of Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services users (8 reviewers) with BrowserStack. These users, likely involved in delivering specialized services and solutions, appear particularly sensitive to performance and cost, given the project-based nature of their work and the need to manage budgets effectively. While the sample size limits definitive conclusions, key areas for improvement emerged around performance, reporting, and pricing. Specifically, 3 of 8 reviewers noted concerns about performance and speed, which can directly impact project timelines and client satisfaction. Similarly, 3 reviewers suggested improvements to reporting functionalities and the user interface. The cost of BrowserStack was a concern for 2 reviewers, highlighting the need for solutions that are scalable and cost-effective for smaller teams or individual projects common in the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector.

Performance and Speed

Sometimes when there are too many users access it it lags a lot.

Reporting and UI

Reports can be more improvised

Pricing and Plans

Pricing is high

Loading Reviews List....