Laserfiche has two main editions: Rio and Avante: Laserfiche Rio is designed to meet the needs of large organizations that have more than 100 users. It combines content management functionality with business process management (BPM), security and auditing, unlimited servers and a thin-client interface. Add-ons include records management functionality, public Web portals and production-level document capture and processing.
Laserfiche Avante is an ECM suite for small to medium organizations with…
$540
per year per user
VisualCron
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
VisualCron is an automation, Integration and Task Scheduler tool. VisualCron combines many features into one product. VisualCron was founded in 2004. Through scheduling users can set Jobs to run on a specific time or event with the help of Triggers. The Tasks in each Job automate scripts to eliminate human errors. Through various Tasks users can integrate different systems through file transfer, encryption, compression and…
N/A
Pricing
Laserfiche
VisualCron
Editions & Modules
Starter
$540
per year per user
Starter
$600
per year per user
Professional
$710
per year per user (starts at 10 users)
Professional
$830
per year per user (starting at 5 users)
Business
$830
per year per user (starts at 25 users)
Business
$950
per year per user (starting at 25 users)
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Laserfiche
VisualCron
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$1,499 per Server
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Laserfiche
VisualCron
Features
Laserfiche
VisualCron
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Laserfiche
8.5
25 Ratings
6% above category average
VisualCron
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving
8.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document management
8.525 Ratings
00 Ratings
Records management
9.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval
8.524 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration
8.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation
8.516 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance
9.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management
9.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated workflows
8.516 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile support
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Laserfiche
-
Ratings
VisualCron
3.5
1 Ratings
54% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Laserfiche
-
Ratings
VisualCron
7.7
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Laserfiche
-
Ratings
VisualCron
4.2
1 Ratings
52% below category average
Process designer
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Process simulation
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Business rules engine
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Process player
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Form builder
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Model execution
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Laserfiche is well suited to the submission of simple routine reports to create a record repository. We use it for routine transport reports, audit reports, and anonymous citizen complaints. It creates a simple chronological record of routine events that can be reviewed and easily stored and recalled. Because the reports are in PDF format, it is not well suited to anything that needs to be imported into a common database or amended after submission.
VisualCron does accommodate continuous file processing. Like packing and unpacking compressed files, splitting or merging files, sending E-mail's and executing queries on databases. VisualCron in less suitable for performing very complex operations on files like, arithmetic with numbers, dates or amounts. Very complex job scripts become cluttered. Debugging Job scripts is not easy.
While Laserfiche has some powerful development tools, it is difficult to manage configurations while promoting code across environments. For example, SQL connections and other environment specific resources have to be manually configured in each environment.
Laserfiche forms are a newer addition to the product family and could use some product maturity. While easy to use for simple forms, once your forms become more complex, you need to accomplish tasks by heavy JavaScript coding.
VisualCron should more specifically indicate the root cause of an error.
If copying a file goes wrong, VisualCron reports 'can't copy file'. I expect 'no read permissions from original' or 'no write permissions from destination'.
VisualCron offers no way to execute a Job script line by line
We plan on renewing Laserfiche for the coming year but also have been considering a scanning and document management solution that can be purchased from our new accounting system company, we are implementing the accounting system this year. It will be a couple years before we make a decision to stay with Laserfiche or change.
It has an intuitive design that feels very natural to any user that has ever used Outlook or Windows Explorer. There are multiple ways to perform every action in order to help users with various software experiences find the shortcuts and actions they seek quickly and effectively.
I am very satisfied with Laserfiche. I have found that certain larger jobs may are slow. This may also be related to our infrastructure environment. We have been able to tune Laserfiche to increase performance on larger jobs.
Performance, of course, is largely dependent on the underlying environment. Laserfiche does its part with multi-threading, taking advantage of multi-core servers on scanning, workflows, and bots. A SQL-Server back-end is suitable for small to medium-sized company, but may not scale to large, where Oracle would be the better choice. Workflows can be poorly written and perform recursive work slowing down the system. It's better to run batch type workflows at night when possible.
I have never had to wait for help from Laserfiche. If I cannot find the answer online, I can easily send an email to a customer support representative. I have always been helped the same day and my questions have always been resolved. The Empower conference is always a great learning opportunity and the online resources and webinars are top-notch.
Questions and problems can be addressed to VisualCron 's support department via E-mail. I usually get a good answer from them fairly quickly. There is also a VisualCron forum where you can ask questions that will be answered by other VisualCron users.
Easily accessible 24/7 so am able to complete courseware whenever time allows: Commute to work; waiting for friends or family; at night while relaxing [with a delicious glass of wine!]; whenever and wherever time and circumstances permit. Courseware is well written and presented in an easy to follow and understand format.
The core infrastructure of Laserfiche, and the end user experience, is vastly superior. OnBase has a TERRIBLE UI and administration console by comparison. The core architecture of OnBase is also more scattered, while all Laserfiche processes go through a single service. Overall, the Laserfiche product is easier and more intuitive to install, maintain, and use.
For simple processes, VisualCron is easier to use and maintain. For complicated processes, Quadient Inspire offers more options. The graphical representations of waiting, running or completed jobs is adequate for both products. The logging of job actions is better in Quadient Inpire as in VisualCron.
Laserfiche has increased the efficiency of our sales reps by giving making all of the historical sales deal information very simple and fast to retrieve.
Laserfiche has increased our efficiency with our AP department and gave department heads the ability to approve invoices where ever they are.
I would say the biggest ROI came with the transparency of the order process for new deals. Before there would be numerous phone calls made daily to find out where an order was within the process, and now you can simply look at all deals at any time.