Missing better support for tables in Miro
January 31, 2025
Missing better support for tables in Miro
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
We use Miro for shared understanding and as a central repository for:
- organizational diagrams (people, vison, goals, business models)
- product roadmaps, product architecture, new features presentations
- customer journey depiction
- user personas depiction
- shared with clients to support client onboarding
Teams have their boards and they use them to support meeting's agenda, collect information and build upon it.
- organizational diagrams (people, vison, goals, business models)
- product roadmaps, product architecture, new features presentations
- customer journey depiction
- user personas depiction
- shared with clients to support client onboarding
Teams have their boards and they use them to support meeting's agenda, collect information and build upon it.
Pros
- endless board, we never lost anything
- we can all edit at the same time
- easy to follow a presentation
- quick to learn basics
Cons
- providing a quick access to my boards
- diagramming is complicated
- copy/paste of tables is terrible, also table mgmt in general is weak
- helping to structure endless board - how to find stuff
- how to add new things in the same proportions
- Better shared understanding
- More alignment with business goals
- Long run consistency
- With a new Saas every day the negative impact is having data spread over too many places. Bad for security, information leaks.
That's exactly why we started in Korona period. To have team members engaged in the discussion, to check shared understanding of the scope, ideas and solutions. It supported our collaboration. In the past we made such boards on the whiteboard table, made a photo, nowadays we meet around Miro board. It's a bit clumsy for live meet ups. One cannot see well the details and it's difficult to edit the board while demonstrating on a big screen.
Miro is matching our needs best (drawing capacity, scathing ideas, collaborating, voting, interactive work with clients). It loads quickly enough. Colleagues learned basics quickly. We took Miro over Mural as we had a facilitator coach for Miro at hand. They preferred Miro.
We use Figma for front end designs and prototypes. Canva for marketing design. We use Confluence as knowledge base, next to JIRA.
We use Figma for front end designs and prototypes. Canva for marketing design. We use Confluence as knowledge base, next to JIRA.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation