Item: Miro
Rating: 8
Author: Rich Higgins

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Miro to track changes in marketing and advertising assets visually. Team members and clients can review, comment, and download asset images as needed and on demand. We strategize, wireframe, and review client designs.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Ability to zoom in and out of large whiteboards.
Ability to track and resolve comments.
Ability to handle large numbers of images.

Cons

Ability to crop imported PDFs.
Ability to import and replace multiple images.
More table editing capabilities.

Return on Investment

Reduced review time and email correspondence.
Increased efficiency of brand asset communication.
Increased ability for collaboration and decentralized creation.

Implementation Rating

Ease of Integration

Miro is very easy to learn and has a simplified UI but has robust features.

Collaboration

I wish Miro had been created years ago. The ability to add files, scale projects, and collaboratively review in real-time or asymmetrically is indispensable.

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Adobe InDesign, monday.com, Toggl Track

Likelihood to Recommend

Miro is great for reviewing large numbers of images, files, copies, and assets on an infinite whiteboard. It's like an endless foam core board for ideas. It's not an excellent tool for designing or project managing.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Essential tool for collaboration, review & reference.