Insights from ManageEngine Endpoint Central Reviewers
Based on 30 verified reviews published in the last 18 months
What other products like ManageEngine Endpoint Central have you used or evaluated?
30 answeredWhen discussing ManageEngine Endpoint Central, reviewers frequently cite other products they have used or evaluated in similar IT management domains. The most commonly mentioned alternatives or supplementary tools include other ManageEngine products, cited by 17% of reviewers. Microsoft's offerings, particularly those related to endpoint management and remote access, were also noted by 13% of reviewers. Additionally, NinjaOne, a unified IT management platform, appeared in discussions among 7% of the review sample. These mentions suggest that users often operate within an ecosystem of various IT management tools, where ManageEngine Endpoint Central is one component alongside other solutions from the same vendor or competitors.
ManageEngine Products
5 mentionsReviewers frequently mentioned other products from the ManageEngine suite when discussing their experience with Endpoin…
Reviewers frequently mentioned other products from the ManageEngine suite when discussing their experience with Endpoint Central. These mentions indicate that users often leverage multiple solutions from the same vendor, suggesting an integrated approach to IT management or a familiarity with the ManageEngine ecosystem. The specific products cited span areas like service desk management and password management.
Microsoft Products
4 mentionsA notable portion of reviewers, 13%, identified Microsoft products as alternatives or complementary tools used in conju…
A notable portion of reviewers, 13%, identified Microsoft products as alternatives or complementary tools used in conjunction with or instead of ManageEngine Endpoint Central. These products range from cloud-based endpoint management solutions like Intune to on-premises systems and remote access tools. This suggests that Microsoft's extensive portfolio remains a significant player in the IT management landscape for many organizations.
NinjaOne
2 mentionsNinjaOne was mentioned by 7% of reviewers as another platform they had used or evaluated. This indicates that NinjaOne…
NinjaOne was mentioned by 7% of reviewers as another platform they had used or evaluated. This indicates that NinjaOne is considered a relevant alternative or competitor in the endpoint management and IT operations space. Reviewers sometimes cited it alongside other solutions, highlighting a diverse set of tools considered for similar functions.
What positive or negative impact (i.e. Return on Investment or ROI) has ManageEngine Endpoint Central had on your overall business objectives?
30 answeredManageEngine Endpoint Central significantly enhances operational efficiency and contributes positively to business objectives, primarily through substantial time savings for IT teams. Reviewers frequently report that the platform streamlines various IT tasks, with 40% highlighting reduced manual intervention and quicker resolution times. Key areas of impact include improved remote support capabilities, which boost productivity by enabling rapid issue resolution (20% of reviewers), and effective patch management, which reduces vulnerabilities and manual effort (23% of reviewers). The platform also contributes to more efficient software deployment and management, speeding up installations and new PC setups (17% of reviewers). Furthermore, its asset and inventory management features provide better oversight of hardware and software resources, cited by 17% of users. While the platform generally offers a positive return on investment by optimizing IT operations, a segment of reviewers (13%) noted a mixed impact on cost, suggesting that while it can reduce licensing expenses, the full suite might be perceived as expensive.
Time Savings
12 mentionsReviewers consistently praise ManageEngine Endpoint Central for its ability to significantly reduce the time spent on I…
Reviewers consistently praise ManageEngine Endpoint Central for its ability to significantly reduce the time spent on IT administration tasks. This includes faster remote troubleshooting, automated patching, and expedited setup processes for new devices, leading to increased overall IT productivity.
Patch Management
7 mentionsThe platform is highly valued for its robust patch management capabilities, which help maintain system security and com…
The platform is highly valued for its robust patch management capabilities, which help maintain system security and compliance. Reviewers noted a significant reduction in vulnerabilities due to automated patching and reliable reporting, leading to a more secure and stable IT environment.
Remote Control/Support
6 mentionsManageEngine Endpoint Central enhances the efficiency of IT support by providing comprehensive remote control functiona…
ManageEngine Endpoint Central enhances the efficiency of IT support by providing comprehensive remote control functionalities. This allows technicians to quickly diagnose and resolve issues without needing physical access to devices, thereby improving user productivity and reducing support-related travel or shipping costs.
Asset/Inventory Management
5 mentionsReviewers find the asset and inventory management features beneficial for maintaining an accurate overview of their IT…
Reviewers find the asset and inventory management features beneficial for maintaining an accurate overview of their IT infrastructure. The platform centralizes the monitoring of hardware and software assets, which aids in better resource allocation and compliance.
Software Deployment/Management
5 mentionsThe platform significantly improves the efficiency of software deployment and management across an organization. It ena…
The platform significantly improves the efficiency of software deployment and management across an organization. It enables silent installations, custom configurations, and rapid setup of new machines, reducing manual effort and ensuring consistent software environments.
Besides ManageEngine Endpoint Central, what other software do you regularly use? How likely would you be to recommend it to a friend or colleague?
30 answeredReviewers frequently utilize a range of software alongside ManageEngine Endpoint Central, primarily for IT service management, remote access, and endpoint security. The most commonly cited complementary tool is ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus, mentioned by 17% of reviewers, indicating a preference for integrated solutions within the ManageEngine ecosystem. Other frequently used applications include remote desktop tools like AnyDesk and TeamViewer, each cited by 7% of the review sample, suggesting a need for flexible remote support capabilities. Additionally, Microsoft Intune was also noted by 7% of reviewers, often alongside other Microsoft security and deployment tools, highlighting a reliance on broader enterprise management platforms. The overall sentiment for these mentioned tools is consistently positive, implying that reviewers find them effective and valuable additions to their IT infrastructure.
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
5 mentionsManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is a frequently used companion to Endpoint Central, with 17% of reviewers citing its use.…
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is a frequently used companion to Endpoint Central, with 17% of reviewers citing its use. This suggests that organizations often integrate multiple solutions from the same vendor to streamline IT service management and operations. Reviewers appear to find value in leveraging this tool for help desk and IT asset management functionalities.
Microsoft Intune
2 mentionsMicrosoft Intune is another product that reviewers regularly use in conjunction with Endpoint Central, mentioned by 7%…
Microsoft Intune is another product that reviewers regularly use in conjunction with Endpoint Central, mentioned by 7% of the sample. Its inclusion often alongside other Microsoft security and deployment tools indicates that organizations integrate it for comprehensive endpoint management and security within the Microsoft ecosystem. Reviewers likely value its capabilities for unified endpoint management.
AnyDesk
2 mentionsAnyDesk is a remote access solution that 7% of reviewers utilize alongside Endpoint Central, often mentioned in conjunc…
AnyDesk is a remote access solution that 7% of reviewers utilize alongside Endpoint Central, often mentioned in conjunction with other remote support tools. This suggests a need for reliable and efficient remote connectivity for troubleshooting and support tasks. Reviewers find it to be a valuable tool for facilitating remote IT operations.
TeamViewer
2 mentionsTeamViewer is also frequently used for remote access by 7% of reviewers, indicating its role as a key tool for remote s…
TeamViewer is also frequently used for remote access by 7% of reviewers, indicating its role as a key tool for remote support and collaboration. Its consistent mention with other remote desktop applications highlights the importance of flexible access solutions in managing diverse IT environments. Reviewers consider it an effective solution for their remote connectivity needs.
Describe how you use ManageEngine Endpoint Central in your organization. What are the business problems the product addresses and what is the scope of your use case?
30 answeredManageEngine Endpoint Central is predominantly utilized by organizations for comprehensive endpoint management, addressing a range of operational and security challenges. Reviewers frequently highlight its utility in maintaining system health and security across diverse IT environments. The most widely cited use case, mentioned by 63% of reviewers, is patch management, which includes support for third-party applications and automated updates. Beyond patching, the platform is frequently employed for remote support and control, cited by 40% of reviewers, enabling IT teams to efficiently assist users and manage devices remotely. Additionally, organizations leverage Endpoint Central for streamlined software and OS deployment, noted by 33% of reviewers, and for configuration management, mentioned by 30%, ensuring consistent settings and compliance. The platform also serves as a valuable tool for asset and inventory management, as reported by 17% of reviewers, providing detailed insights into hardware and software assets.
Patch Management
19 mentionsReviewers consistently praise ManageEngine Endpoint Central for its robust patch management capabilities, which are cri…
Reviewers consistently praise ManageEngine Endpoint Central for its robust patch management capabilities, which are critical for maintaining system security and stability. The platform simplifies the process of distributing updates for both operating systems and third-party applications, often with automation features that reduce manual effort. This functionality helps organizations address time-consuming update processes and manage vulnerabilities effectively, providing a clearer overview of patch levels across servers and clients.
Remote Support/Control
12 mentionsA significant number of reviewers, 40%, value the product's remote support and control features for enhancing IT effici…
A significant number of reviewers, 40%, value the product's remote support and control features for enhancing IT efficiency and user assistance. These tools enable technicians to connect to user devices quickly and without interruption, often providing advanced capabilities like remote PowerShell and Registry editing without direct user interaction. This allows for prompt remediation of issues and efficient management of system resources from a distance.
Software/OS Deployment
10 mentionsReviewers frequently cite the ease and effectiveness of deploying software and operating systems using ManageEngine End…
Reviewers frequently cite the ease and effectiveness of deploying software and operating systems using ManageEngine Endpoint Central, a capability highlighted by 33% of the feedback. The platform facilitates the installation of applications, creation of custom builds, and deployment of OS images to new devices. This functionality streamlines the setup and maintenance of endpoints, ensuring clients and servers are equipped with necessary software and up-to-date versions.
Configuration Management
9 mentionsManageEngine Endpoint Central is valued by 30% of reviewers for its ability to manage and enforce configurations across…
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is valued by 30% of reviewers for its ability to manage and enforce configurations across endpoints. This ensures that devices are deployed with consistent settings and remain compliant with organizational policies. The platform helps IT teams centrally manage security settings, browser configurations, and other system parameters, contributing to a standardized and secure environment.
Asset/Inventory Management
5 mentionsThe platform's capabilities in asset and inventory management are appreciated by 17% of reviewers, who find it instrume…
The platform's capabilities in asset and inventory management are appreciated by 17% of reviewers, who find it instrumental in monitoring and tracking their IT infrastructure. It provides detailed insights into hardware and software assets, enabling organizations to track hardware lifecycles and monitor the security status of devices. This leads to more efficient asset utilization, accurate record-keeping, and optimized operations.
Please provide some detailed examples of areas where ManageEngine Endpoint Central has room for improvement.
30 answeredReviewers of ManageEngine Endpoint Central frequently identify several areas where the product could be enhanced, primarily concerning its patching and deployment capabilities. A third of reviewers (33%) reported difficulties with software deployment, patch failures, and a lack of clarity regarding the reasons for these failures. These issues extend to specific operating systems, with Mac OS and Linux application patching noted as needing improvement. Another significant area for development involves reporting and logging, with 20% of reviewers desiring more explicit error messages and greater flexibility for customized reports. Users also suggested improvements to the user interface and overall usability, cited by 13% of the reviews, to make the platform more intuitive. Furthermore, 10% of reviewers pointed to limitations in platform and OS support, specifically mentioning missing BIOS patching for certain vendors and less robust Mac OS support compared to Windows. Remote control features also present some mixed experiences, with 10% of reviewers noting occasional issues with unattended access and a desire for better notification mechanisms.
Patching and Deployment Issues
10 mentionsA significant portion of reviewers, 33%, expressed challenges with the product's patching and software deployment funct…
A significant portion of reviewers, 33%, expressed challenges with the product's patching and software deployment functionalities. Concerns include the reliability of deployments, difficulty in understanding why patches fail, and a desire for more streamlined processes. Specific issues were raised regarding remote PowerShell features and the less robust support for Mac OS and Linux application patching compared to Windows.
Reporting and Logging Improvements
6 mentionsReviewers frequently highlighted the need for more detailed and user-friendly reporting and logging features. Cited by…
Reviewers frequently highlighted the need for more detailed and user-friendly reporting and logging features. Cited by 20% of reviews, users desire clearer error messages for deployments and patching, as current messages can be ambiguous. There is also a call for more robust customized reporting options and easier access to database schemas for crafting custom queries.
User Interface and Usability
4 mentionsThe user interface and overall usability were identified as areas for improvement by 13% of reviewers. Users suggested…
The user interface and overall usability were identified as areas for improvement by 13% of reviewers. Users suggested that the layout could be more intuitive and seamless for a better experience. Specific mentions included the desire for better optimization of the graphical user interface and making the Mobile Device Management (MDM) module more user-friendly.
Remote Control Features
3 mentionsExperiences with remote control features were mixed among reviewers, with 10% commenting on this aspect. Some users not…
Experiences with remote control features were mixed among reviewers, with 10% commenting on this aspect. Some users noted occasional inconsistencies, such as issues with unattended tablet remote access. There is also an expressed desire for enhanced functionalities, such as notifications when a device comes online, to facilitate remote access.
Platform and OS Support
3 mentionsApproximately 10% of reviewers indicated that the product's support for various platforms and operating systems could b…
Approximately 10% of reviewers indicated that the product's support for various platforms and operating systems could be expanded. Specific gaps were noted concerning the patching of certain third-party applications, such as Adobe products. Reviewers also pointed out limitations in BIOS patching support for specific hardware vendors, like Lenovo, and highlighted that Mac OS support for patching and deployment is not as comprehensive as for Windows.
Please provide some detailed examples of things that ManageEngine Endpoint Central does particularly well.
30 answeredManageEngine Endpoint Central is frequently highlighted by reviewers for its capabilities in endpoint management, with a strong emphasis on maintaining system health and security across an organization's devices. A significant majority of reviewers, 67%, specifically commend the platform's robust patch management features, noting its effectiveness in handling both operating system and third-party application updates. The ability to remotely access and control devices is also a core strength, cited by 57% of reviewers, streamlining troubleshooting and support tasks. Complementing these operational strengths, 57% of reviewers value the comprehensive inventory management, which provides detailed insights into hardware and software assets. Furthermore, the platform's utility in software deployment, mentioned by 50% of reviewers, and its broader device management and configuration functionalities, also cited by 50%, contribute to its reputation as a comprehensive tool for IT administrators. These features collectively enable efficient oversight and maintenance of diverse IT environments.
Patch Management
20 mentionsReviewers consistently praise Endpoint Central's patch management capabilities, noting its effectiveness in automating…
Reviewers consistently praise Endpoint Central's patch management capabilities, noting its effectiveness in automating and centralizing updates for both Windows operating systems and third-party applications. This functionality is seen as crucial for maintaining system security and stability across the IT environment, as highlighted by 67% of reviewers.
Remote Access/Control
17 mentionsThe platform's remote access and control features are highly valued for enabling efficient troubleshooting and support,…
The platform's remote access and control features are highly valued for enabling efficient troubleshooting and support, with 57% of reviewers mentioning this capability. Reviewers appreciate the ability to establish remote connections, including unattended sessions, to assist users and manage servers effectively.
Inventory Management
17 mentionsEndpoint Central provides strong inventory management, allowing IT teams to gain detailed insights into their hardware…
Endpoint Central provides strong inventory management, allowing IT teams to gain detailed insights into their hardware and software assets, a feature noted by 57% of reviewers. Reviewers highlight its reporting capabilities for tracking installed software and hardware specifics, which aids in asset management and compliance.
Software Deployment
15 mentionsReviewers find the software deployment functionality to be a significant advantage, enabling efficient distribution and…
Reviewers find the software deployment functionality to be a significant advantage, enabling efficient distribution and installation of applications across multiple devices, a point raised by 50% of reviewers. The platform supports various deployment methods, including configurations and self-service options, streamlining software rollouts.
Device Management/Configuration
15 mentionsThe product is recognized for its broad device management and configuration capabilities, extending beyond basic update…
The product is recognized for its broad device management and configuration capabilities, extending beyond basic updates to include aspects like security policies and hardware control, according to 50% of reviewers. Reviewers appreciate features such as managing BitLocker keys, blocking USB drives, and widespread compatibility across different operating systems like macOS.