Qualtrics XM for People Teams is software to build engaged and high-performing teams, improve manager and individual effectiveness, and make informed and timely business decisions.
Qualtrics Employee Experience is ideal for measuring the experience of employees in both traditional (annual touch point surveys) or programmatic/regular surveys. The tool has sufficient flexibility to allow you to scale the survey segment the questions to allow for granular and top-level analysis of the employees lived and believed experiences
Quick adaption came from the ease of use and that is why I would recommend it. If you need more robust cascading goal capabilities you might have to work at it
We've experienced challenges beginning new review cycles without old cycles not being closed out
The UI is OK, but nothing special (a new version has been released, but we've not upgraded yet)
We currently don't have any sort of integration between ReviewSnap and our payroll system for hires/terms. I'm not sure if this is possible or not but wasn't discussed when we implemented it.
Qualtrics Employee Experience is much better than simplistic companies like Survey Monkey, which has poor performance, editability, reporting, and customer service. It honestly feels like a low-end version of Qualtrics Employee Experience. It is worth spending a bit more to get significantly better results. If you don't put effort into showing your employees you care, they won't care. That's why I pick Qualtrics Employee Experience.
Reviewsnap has been comparable to most the systems I've used in the past. I wouldn't say that one of the systems I've used and mentioned above sticks out far above or below the others.
It's saved us a lot of paper and confusion. We used to use a lot of paper to track reviews from all over the organization. Now we use Reviewsnap to keep track of reviews and to use old reviews as reference when discussing goals.
The cloud-based system is great due to the fact that we have satellite offices around the US. You can even do a review from Alaska if required.
Initially the customer service was great and responsive during deployment. Once the deployment was complete, the HR director reported having a hard time contacting support.
