Microsoft Teams vs. Panopto

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Panopto
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Panopto is a video management platform for businesses and universities from the company of the same name in Seattle, supporting the recording, sharing, live streaming, and (after recording) sharing via LMS or internal video site, video search, and virtual classroom.
$14.99
per month
Pricing
Microsoft TeamsPanopto
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Pro
$14.99
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft TeamsPanopto
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft TeamsPanopto
Features
Microsoft TeamsPanopto
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
4.7
Ratings
48% below category average
Panopto
-
Ratings
Task Management5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts3.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling4.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation4.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Search4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Panopto
-
Ratings
Chat6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications5.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase4.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
5.3
Ratings
39% below category average
Panopto
-
Ratings
Versioning5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files4.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files5.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features4.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
7.0
Ratings
7% below category average
Video personalization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
eCommerce00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Support for advertisements00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Video SEO00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video Platform Integrations
Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
9.4
Ratings
41% above category average
Integration to LMS00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Video access controls00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
User management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video link sharing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Internal video00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
External video00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.5
Ratings
1% above category average
Player customization00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Embedded videos00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Mobile compatibility00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
7.5
Ratings
4% below category average
A/B testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Streaming quality reports00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Per viewer tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Per video tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.1
Ratings
7% below category average
On-Demand video00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Live streaming00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Impact of streaming on network00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video upload & format support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Video library / File management00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Video portal00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Video Engagement
Comparison of Video Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Audience polling00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Audience Q&A / Live chat00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Video comments00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft TeamsPanopto
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Wistia
Wistia
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Flipgrid
Flipgrid
Score 1.0 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Ensemble Video
Ensemble Video
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft TeamsPanopto
Likelihood to Recommend
6.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft TeamsPanopto
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft Teams is ideal for organizations where employees regularly collaborate by sharing files, working on the same documents, updating the progress, etc. This is because different file formats are supported for online editing and collaboration with the help of Microsoft Teams. Additionally, for every file which is shared among the team members, emails are not sent again and again which helps in easily managing and organizing files. It is less appropriate where the team members have to instantly reply to an urgent task as sometimes the notifications are not sent properly which may lead to a delay in the work.
Read full review
The more I used it, the more I appreciated its ease of use. If I ever ran into a situation that I felt might be a learning opportunity at some point in the future, I would simply log in, record a session, and only allow access if/when it was appropriate later. Since the more recent versions also work on mobile phones, there really wasn't a time when I couldn't record something to review or present later. During covid, teachers didn't have access to their normal equipment, and students weren't always able to get access to a robust recording setup to do their recordings. Some students actually did recordings of presentations in their cars, or in the stairwells. Portability is powerful. I think that we all run into situations where our presentation didn't go quite as well as we had intended. As Panopto grew, they focused more on allowing the user to control their content and perform some basic (I would argue more than basic) editing, which made actions like awkward pauses easy to "fix" as you could create smooth, blended transitions easily.
Read full review
Pros
  • Video calls are great with Microsoft Teams. They've made big improvements over the last year and I rarely have issue with getting on. It's nice when things just work.
  • The most used functionality is, of course, the chat feature. It does what it's supposed to do and you can create chat groups from whoever you'd like. We use it a lot when there is a special project and a team from various groups get together for a short period of time to get things done.
  • An overlooked function is the ability to search anything within Microsoft Teams. Any photo, document, or chat can be searched and found pretty easily. I can't tell you how many times this has saved me from having to rewrite something or start over.
Read full review
  • It captures multiple streams simultaneous (video, desktop, audio only etc) and is pretty smart when it comes to working with imported PowerPoint Decks.
  • The end product can easily be shared in multiple formats and it has pretty rich content editing abilities for doing basic post-production clean up.
  • They have recently introduced an in-line quizzing feature which can integrate with your LMS's Gradebook.
  • The Analytics feature is very strong - we can get student level analytics when we integrate/embed the videos into our LMS.
Read full review
Cons
  • I sometimes have a hard time viewing both the meeting screen and chat window at the same time.
  • There have been times when someone in a meeting will totally lose their connection.
  • At times the sound quality is not what it should be which makes it hard to hear each other.
Read full review
  • Captions are always a problem for us. We would like to caption all our videos and currently, the automatic captioning is not very good.
  • We would like integration with our VLE grade book to allow seamless submission and grading for students.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The overall functionality of the product is incredible in that it provides a one-stop solution for organization and communication. The product is also very well integrated into Microsoft Outlook and other Office apps. Visually pleasing and very easy to use interface. New features are constantly being added to enhance the user experience.
Read full review
Needs some work, but I'm sure improvements will come over time
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I think Microsoft Team is overall good application for communication, track Project work inter the teams and also intra teams. I have 7 out of 10 because it needs improvements in certain features like video sharing call, call drop, audio quality and connecting problems even after having good internet connection.
Read full review
Panopto has been quick to answer any questions, but their rollouts and updates have caused issues where we felt a little blindsided by unexpected changes. Their development cycle is slow and often their promises for future updates have been extremely slow or never come.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We chose primarily because of the promised integration with the Microsoft Business Suite - which it mostly delivers on. That does give Teams an obvious advantage over competitors. IMHO Teams has a richer, more mature feature set, and the experience is more reliable and stable. Although like any of there there is room for imporvement.
Read full review
Panopto has the best captioning features that I've seen for a video repository. This enables us to caption videos quickly and efficiently. It also has tags and chaptering which makes viewing videos easier. We can also link videos inside Panopto to outside entities without needing them to have a Panopto account. Panopto works best if you have a LOT of video content, but if you only have some or don't care about organization, SharePoint (or Microsoft Stream) might be a cheaper/more efficient option.
Read full review
Scalability
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • User experience has been much better than the previous Skype for Business app. It has an easy-to-use interface with persistent chats. The search feature is very fast and useful.
  • MS Teams has mostly focused on Collaboration and team building features which are very useful for organisational communications. This in turn has a positive impact on the overall business outcome.
  • Scheduling meetings have never been so easy in the past. We can schedule meetings on the go without any hassles
  • Since Teams is accessible from multiple platforms like Laptop, Desktop, Mobile phones, etc it has been very convenient from a Mobility perspective.
Read full review
  • During the pandemic, Panopto allows our faculty to quickly stage up lectures that were normally delivered in person, and these recordings reached thousands of students who could not come to campus for class.
  • Both faculty and student report high satisfaction with the flexibility and convenience of having Panopto video content available in a course to watch and rewatch for learner reinforcement.
  • Panopto's adaptable media distribution reduced impact on student technology and internet speeds when they might not have access to broadband connections, allowing them to continue to access essential course materials.
  • Speech to text capabilities. increase accessibility compliance of media content.
  • Archiving training materials in Panopto allows faculty, staff, TAs, and students to easily find recordings for reference.
Read full review
ScreenShots