Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Trend Micro Cloud One - Application Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management.
$2.50
per user/per month
Trend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Trend Micro Cloud One – Application Security delivers an embedded security framework for web applications and containerized web apps, including Kubernetes and serverless functions to protect their microservices applications in traditional, cloud, or Kubernetes environments. The vendor states their Application Security is the only fully automated, cloud runtime protection solution for Ruby and Python that does not require any changes to the web application code.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
Editions & Modules
Academic
$2.50
per user/per month
Standalone
$5.20
per user/per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
Features
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
8.4
Ratings
2% below category average
Trend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Management8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Infection Remediation9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware Detection8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
Dynatrace
Dynatrace
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Defender for EndpointTrend Micro Cloud One - Application Security
Likelihood to Recommend
Because of its integration with Windows, it is very easy to deploy and manage. Any IT department should be able to leverage the software and interface. The admin portal provides weighted recommendations that comprise the Secure Store, offering admins, security teams, and business owners valuable insights into their security footprint without requiring a strong security background. The software would be ideal for small and mid-sized businesses that cannot dedicate resources to security. Larger enterprises would also benefit, but may require the enhanced license.
Read full review
Scenarios where it's well suited - 1) AWS cloud environments where application security and ZTN is a must. 2) One-stop-shop for centralized discovery of apps/workloads. 3) Custom reporting client needs. 4) CI/CD pipeline - easy to design DevOps cycles.
Read full review
Pros
  • One, it's crazy lightweight, so compared to some of the competitors that we also have used with our security services, it's really lightweight and so I don't have a lot of overhead on the system that it's running on.
  • It does really fantastic PowerShell integration.
Read full review
  • Easy integration with AWS environment
  • holistic protection - workload and network security
  • Monitoring capabilities - SIEM tools which helps in RCA analysis.
Read full review
Cons
  • So the fact that Defender for Endpoint still works with signatures is actually, I don't know, a little difficult for us because, I mean, since Microsoft trusts those signatures, you can easily inject code. And we've done it many times. To show that you can inject code through vulnerabilities like CV 2013, 99, and 33 but still keep the signature. So because of the trust of those signatures, the malware just kind of slides into the environment without Defender knowing. That's the first part. The second part is that the behavioral analysis is not precisely its Prime. It's not Defender's best capability for endpoints. So, Defender does not identify all behaviors considered by other EDRs in the market.
Read full review
  • Found a tad difficult in case of hybrid cloud environments - VMware specific etc
  • API calls did not work well with only a few applications ( SNOW etc), most of it is fine
  • Professional services / Support - dedicated customer support should be more proactive, flexible
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft Defender is closely catching -up in market with existing competitors they have added DLP endpoint & DLP Network and Cloud DLP solution last year with OCR capabilities. I would say Microsoft Defender is not legacy Vendor in end point security, the need to learn from other vendors in market and focus on new XDR technologies, which is going to be new battle for all vendors
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Because in terms of the usability is easy to understand, it's easy to manage, obviously you need to have specific skills to do that, but I would say that even the console and the product is walking through the flow that you are looking for on this console.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint chugs along just fine no matter what we throw at it and what systems it's running on. It doesn't take up a lot of resources either, so that's welcomed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easy on memory and resources on clients.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Overall support is really good for this product. Since it's a Microsoft product, you will get good support from a number of different resources, including knowledgebase articles on the web, support from Microsoft technicians, and documentation (which tends to very thorough). Also, there is a vast user support community for this product, so user support forums would also be another valuable channel to get help if needed. I don't envision too many people will have issues/problems with the product, as it tends to run good overall.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Deployment was handled by our team here and everything went pretty smoothly. We did have a few hiccups in our test group, but that only took a bit to get ironed out.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers strong integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure services, which provide a unified security experience. While McAfee Trellix is known for solid antivirus, Microsoft Defender excels in integration in the ecosystem.
Read full review
1) flexible customer support and PoV assistance as compared to other vendors 2) Quick TAT turnaround, and easy sampling - Automation features are smooth to use and leverage 3) Our client was interested in this solution since they heard it from one of their other partners from USA - So, this solution was already a step ahead, we just had to pick it up and get used to it
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is easily scaled from small orgs to giant enterprises.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Reduced incidents of security breaches lead to lower remediation costs and avoid potential financial losses and reputational damage.
  • Reduces the need for additional third-party security solutions and training, thereby lowering overall security management costs.
  • Increased efficiency and productivity of IT staff lead to better allocation of resources and cost savings.
  • Reduces the risk of fines and sanctions associated with non-compliance, ensuring business continuity and protecting revenue.
Read full review
  • Our single PoV helped few customers already - RoI return - Excellent
  • GTM strategy - Go to Market worked - Saved potentially 500k USD minimum for client - within few months
  • Allianz assistance - client support in planning helped to further smoothen the RoI cycle, we have planned upto FY 23 for our healthcare client
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots

Screenshot of blocked activitiesScreenshot of Detects & respondsScreenshot of discovers vulnerabilityScreenshot of Eliminates blind spotsScreenshot of Risk management