Maze vs. Userlytics

Suited for: - I think that this software is a must-have for any experience or product designer that needs validation from any audience - Designers that rapidly prototype with Figma - Designers looking to establish an inexpensive way to deliver on user testing Less appropriate for: - If you are looking for a survey replacement this is probably not for you even though it does that quite well, simply due to the cost. Google Forms would be a more fiscal choice. - Marketing visual designers who are adept at visual builder tools (WebFlow, Divi, Elementor, etc) with A/B testing ability would probably find other products more valuable.

It is an excellent resource for user testing, especially when it comes to using the Userlytics user panel. I would love to see them add a recruiting part and communication with potential users, in case we need to bring our own panel.

Incentivized

• It helps to gather quick and helpful insight
• It helps greatly to validate design and prototypes
• Intuitive tool and easy to work with

Incentivized

• On Userlytics it is easy to set up test and the required tasks.
• Userlytics offer you transcription services, which can save a lot of time; rather than watch and transcribe the full video yourself, they can do this for you.
• You can request to recruit particular people, with options like device, country and the use of prescreening questions.

Incentivized

• Too easy to delete a draft Maze User Testing - I lost all my progress yesterday and had to redo it
• Some testers have mentioned the Maze User Testing interface was hard to use - didn't get specifics on that

Incentivized

• Usability of its platform
• Simpler pricing model (it always takes so much time to explain to someone new, how Userlytics works)

Incentivized

I think it's very user friendly. I think it gives you a chance to get a feel for websites you may not previously have experience with nor have otherwise experienced. It's also a great way to give input and help shape functionality of business you may enjoy or have further interest in

Incentivized

Any issues that presented themselves were dealt with in a quick and efficient manner and fully rectified by the knowledgeable team over at Maze.

Incentivized

They give their best and also reply to queries immediately

Well trained Professionls

Decent but not comprehensive

Even though it takes time to set up. The work is diligent and out of the quality is great

When looking for tools that could help us understand our customers better, we needed something that would be easy to use, had the functionality and flexibility of running multiple types of tests and exercises, and allowed our team to be able to do these tests quickly. Only Maze could really tick all the above boxes.

Incentivized

We used WhatUsersDo. However, the tool currently got bought out by a bigger company and were removing the remote research tool. We chose to use Userlytics as it stacked up well against competitors.

Incentivized

Delay to get output

• You are able to validate your project or design with a maze User Testing. Maze User Testing is an all-in-one usability tool platform.
• You are able to create a multi-scenario for a free option with limited features.
• Pricing is quite expensive. if they have an option for less than $99/month. A freelancer or small company can consider using it.

Incentivized

• More ideas
• Better grasp on functionality of website
• An idea of how the websites work on a phone platform

Incentivized