Ladders Recruiter vs. Monster.com

It would depend on the company size. From experience, it does not serve us well but it might work better for a different company or industry

Incentivized

It is very well for the IT recruitment. Database of the C2C is candidate is very large and very helpful. Monster.com timely do the updates so less bugs and less issues compared to other portals. Using different to get the best potential candidate is very good while using Monster Job Portal.

Incentivized

• It does have a large applicant base
• It seemed to have qualified users

Incentivized

• Monster makes it easy for us to post jobs on their platform.
• Working with Monster does an excellent job of providing alerts when applicants submit for open positions.
• Our applications that we get from Monster applicants are easy for us to segment out for faster sorting and selections.

Incentivized

• The response rate of the candidates(but that isn't Ladders fault)
• Only one user can access the account which does not serve us well as we have several people that work on Executive positions.
• From experience, The ability to get candidates to respond to you was awful

Incentivized

• Monster.com can improve on its data redundancy aspect. It frustrates the users to look at or access the same sets of results or the same applications again and again.
• It can also look into the spam feature. There are ways one can spam it by taking out information.

Incentivized

0 WE are not going to use it

Incentivized

With the use of Monster.com I can get my job done with the turn around time. The user interface is very good to use and anyone can use it at the first time. It has saved search features which is very useful for tracking. Mainly, it is useful for both job seekers as well as for the recruiters.

Incentivized

0 We tried several time to get in touch with customer service and was never able to

Incentivized

Monster is a job portal with rich features and a great depth of database in candidates. They also have a good search option that is able to display the right candidates when you search for them. The only gripe that I have about Monster is that they need to improve their database of candidates when it comes to blue-collar jobs or non-software jobs.

Incentivized

It does not at all

Incentivized

Monster.com Vs. Dice.com Vs. Indeed.com Vs. Naukri.com Vs. LinkedIn.com Monster has a larger database than Dice Monster and has a broader reach across all sectors not related to tech. With Monster, we can attract more active candidates than passive ones that LinkedIn uses. Monster is more globally present than Naukri, which is used mostly only in India. Monster job posts are more effective than Indeed.

Incentivized

• None. We got no ROI with Ladders

Incentivized

• Monster.com helped me to close the niche positions and diverse positions very quickly which in return made a huge impact on profit for organization and myself as well.
• Monster.com helps me reduce the time to fulfill a particular position which again helps to increase the cost.
• Monster.com has helped me to reach across various demographic groups allowing my company to tap into a more diverse talent pool.

Incentivized