Data.com (discontinued) vs. LeadGnome

There are many scenarios that make data.com well suited, but most specifically, it works very well when looking for contacts within a certain zip code. You can sort and find information about these contacts and pay by points. This helps because you are able to pick and choose which you want to pay for.

Incentivized

LeadGnome is a perfect fit for B2B businesses executing account-based marketing campaigns. It's perfect for organizations looking to increase accuracy and integrity of their contact data. It's perfect for organizations looking to grow their database with additional contacts within the organizations they're targeting.

Incentivized

• Data.com is a great way to find out accurate revenue and employee numbers for companies across various industries.
• Data.com's filtering capabilities allow our team to quickly find the ideal prospects to reach out to.
• Data.com, being owned by Salesforce, allows for a seamless integration into our CRM. This saves us an incredible amount of time and ensures data accuracy.

Incentivized

• LeadGnome integrates seamlessly with other pieces of technology in our ecosystem.
• LeadGnome works in the background of normal activity and doesn't require additional steps or extra effort to capture value.
• LeadGnome helps us build better CRM data and recognize sales triggers such as change of contact on key accounts we're working.

Incentivized

• Some contacts can be old. Perhaps they could consider validating some that are older than 5 years.
• They don't always detect duplicate companies. For example, I've added the same company twice before, I don't understand how they allow that, or prevent others from adding duplicates. It doesn't happen very often,, only occasionally.
• Sometimes data.com will "autocorrect" a job title incorrectly. For example, entering "Director of People & Culture" will autocorrect it to "Director of peopleandculture" If you don't catch it, it looks pretty bad for the next person who wants to view the contact.

Incentivized

• LeadGnome should build additional integrations with other technologies and expand their use cases.
• LeadGnome needs to take an aggressive approach to partnering with agencies as implementation partners.
• LeadGnome needs to tell their stories of success to the world so people can see how well the tool works for their customers.

Incentivized

Very intuitive to use and I've never had any confusion with features. Anyone can create an account and use the platform simply by adding a contact or company into the database to earn points. It's a great option if you don't have budget for lists or pay services. It is easy to use and anyone can benefit from it.

Incentivized

Whenever I've had a question their support has responded pretty quickly and gives me exactly what I am looking for. I have not had any technical issues so I can't speak to issues there, but as far as general questions from a free user they have impressed me with how quickly they get back to me and the thoroughness of their answers.

Incentivized

Adobe Workfront may not be the direct competitor of Data.com, but for the services I was using, Workfront looked a little better when it comes to the user interface. But Data.com definitely had more powerful features & better integration capabilities. Also, it was easier to play around with the customer journey in Data.com as compared to other tools I have used in the past.

Incentivized

I don't know of any true competitors to LeadGnome, it's one of a kind

Incentivized

• The positive impact is gaining more direct contact information for hiring managers.
• Another positive factor is that it is completely free. You gain points for contact information when you add contact information.
• Since it is a free resource, there are no real negative impacts.

Incentivized

• LeadGnome has identified new prospects for my organizations, which has led to new deals sold and an increase in revenue.
• LeadGnome has enriched the data in my CRM and helped speed up operational execution after the sale. This has increased speed to service and decreased the need for additional internal communication.

Incentivized