Cezanne HR vs. NEOGOV Onboard

Cezanne HR features were easy to set and configure the interface security and through Cezanne HR is more easy and quick on multiple financial data transferring across other HR and also Payroll management platforms. To create reports on various business operations and its salary revisions capability is unique and excellent.

Incentivized

NEOGOV Onboard is well-suited for companies who hire many candidates; especially if the Onboarding Team (HR in our case) is working remotely. NEOGOV Onboard would be less-well-suited for organizations who do not hire a lot of candidates and who are able to meet with a new hire in-person.

Incentivized

• Payroll tracking ability is excellent.
• Workflow easy management on Cezanne HR is good.
• Easy employees experience management.

Incentivized

• Good value.
• Built based on U.S. public sector organizations and needs.
• Paper reduction and improved efficiencies.

Incentivized

• Reporting - add more standard reports so I don't have to create them.
• Communicating w/ in the module with team mates.

Incentivized

• A better connection between NEOGOV Onboard and Insight/OHC would be useful
• The ability to utilize candidate text messaging and/or send notices via Onboard (rather than OHC/Insight) could help save time
• It would be helpful to allow candidates to communicate with internal staff via the Mentors Widget in the Preboarding Portal, not just the Onboarding Portal

Incentivized

Need to assess our needs vs how Cezanne HR supports those needs

Incentivized

Some things are complicated to understand, such as the process around them or why things cannot be done. That said, support is always helpful and tries to think of solutions.

Incentivized

Very little downtime

Incentivized

It can sometimes "blip" or be slow, particularly on a Monday morning

Incentivized

The support is great. They are efficient and resolve issues relatively quickly. The support opening times support our HR opening times. What would make it better is a live chat function for support or the ability to phone. Sometimes explaining an issue and going back and forth over email takes longer than a quick phone call or live chat.

Incentivized

It is never the same than in person, but the training was also the implementation so it made sense as it was broken up. It made it more cost effective.

Incentivized

The team were great particularly Wanessa. They knew the system inside and out and always found work arounds to meet our needs. Whilst implementation felt slower than I would want, our expectations were on the whole met

Incentivized

Better for smaller companies. Don't get too big, or you will lose your value. It's a niche market here and the more products you can use, the better; its payroll integrates with on boarding, talent acquisition, staffing, succession planning, and performance management. I don't like the idea of having four different Software companies for something one can do. No manager likes all these different platforms.

Incentivized

NEOGOV has more limitations than bigger HCM solutions and is limited to public sector/government operations.

Incentivized

Very little downtime.

Incentivized

• Fewer people preparing reports that an individual was doing before the dashboard s0 saving one full day per week of reporting.

Incentivized

• Candidates are generally pleased with their Preboarding/Onboarding experience

Incentivized