Cezanne HR is a SaaS consisting of a core People module with optional modules for Absence Management, Performance Management, Time Tracking and Recruitment.
$165
per month
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Lumesse was a talent management suite. Its core functionality is in recruiting and applicant tracking. Lumesse also offers other recruiting features, as well as onboarding and analytics capabilities. It was acquired by Saba and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
Cezanne HR
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Editions & Modules
People
$2
Per User per Month
Absence
$2
Per User per Month
Performance Management
$2
Per User per Month
Time Tracking
$2
Per User per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cezanne HR
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
The system is priced by choice of modules and per employee, per month.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cezanne HR
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Features
Cezanne HR
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Cezanne HR
7.9
3 Ratings
1% above category average
Lumesse (Discontinued)
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Cezanne HR
9.0
3 Ratings
11% above category average
Lumesse (Discontinued)
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Update personal information
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Cezanne HR
5.0
3 Ratings
45% below category average
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.0
2 Ratings
4% below category average
New hire portal
5.03 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
5.03 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Cezanne HR
6.9
3 Ratings
14% below category average
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Corporate goal setting
5.72 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
8.03 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Cezanne HR
9.0
2 Ratings
14% above category average
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.3
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Performance plans
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
9.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Cezanne HR
9.0
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Lumesse (Discontinued)
6.3
1 Ratings
9% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
9.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate development
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Easy to use for payroll admin. Good support for help. especially during covid with all those federal and state sick leave laws. Better talking to other software such as a time and attendance one would be useful. Like having a dedicated rep for our company no matter what the issue is and the backup team for that one person. The reason we left ADP- the call center was that they closed tickets before they were fixed; even if I was on holiday, I did not answer within 48 hours, so they stopped working on the issue.
It has open text boxes to add notes, on the individual candidate home page. Which is helpful when making a quick look at an individual, these notes are very obvious.
It has a search function; however it lacks a wild card (*); so if a req or candidate are spelled differently or referred to differently, there is no way to find them
I have found the system to be very inconsistent and "buggy", for lack of a better term. Today I searched for an internal requisition number and the system could not find the data. I found it by scrolling through manually, and verified that I had entered the information precisely as it appeared. There seems to be no explanation as to why it could not locate this particular entry, but I have been able to use the function without a problem in other instances.
The navigation is not intuitive or user-friendly. It takes an exorbitant amount of clicks to accomplish a task. Each action is confusing and time-consuming.
The system requires a large amount of redundant information in order to enter a job and does not auto-populate. If I indicate a position is located in Chicago, it would logically follow that the state is "Illinois", the country is "United States", and the currency is "USD". I have to manually input these details in both the requisition as well as the separate job advertisement page.
Changes to the job requisition are not reflected in the job advertisement, as they are separate entities. If you need to make a change, you have to update the details twice.
Some things are complicated to understand, such as the process around them or why things cannot be done. That said, support is always helpful and tries to think of solutions.
The support is great. They are efficient and resolve issues relatively quickly. The support opening times support our HR opening times. What would make it better is a live chat function for support or the ability to phone. Sometimes explaining an issue and going back and forth over email takes longer than a quick phone call or live chat.
It is never the same than in person, but the training was also the implementation so it made sense as it was broken up. It made it more cost effective.
The team were great particularly Wanessa. They knew the system inside and out and always found work arounds to meet our needs. Whilst implementation felt slower than I would want, our expectations were on the whole met
Better for smaller companies. Don't get too big, or you will lose your value. It's a niche market here and the more products you can use, the better; its payroll integrates with on boarding, talent acquisition, staffing, succession planning, and performance management. I don't like the idea of having four different Software companies for something one can do. No manager likes all these different platforms.
Lumesse is an average to abover average ATS in my opinion. We work with Lumesse because they came to us with our new client. I don't have an overall issue with Lumesse like I do with some other ATS's.
Decreased employee efficiency -- There are so many steps to create an entry that our recruiters use the system as little as possible. We had hoped to use Lumesse for centralizing information and reporting, but have not been able to do so. Instead, each recruiter keeps a separate Excel sheet, defeating the purpose of having an ATS in the first place. We only use Lumesse to post to our website now. We are very disappointed.