Lumesse was a talent management suite. Its core functionality is in recruiting and applicant tracking. Lumesse also offers other recruiting features, as well as onboarding and analytics capabilities. It was acquired by Saba and is no longer available.
N/A
Pricing
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Verified User
Team Lead
Chose Lumesse (Discontinued)
Lumesse is an average to abover average ATS in my opinion. We work with Lumesse because they came to us with our new client. I don't have an overall issue with Lumesse like I do with some other ATS's.
I have used Taleo (implemented and user adminstrator) and Lumesse's access to international candidates/clients is better, however the user interface of Taleo was easier to manuver.
Verified User
Executive
Chose Lumesse (Discontinued)
The normal competitors like Taleo, Kenexa, etc. And since we were using SAP HR, we did actually used SAP before going to Lumesse.
Lumesse is a basic ATS; I was not part of the decision to select Lumesse. It does not have features like Taleo or myStaffingPro where interviews can be directly scheduled. It also lacks SAP ability to directly send out assessments. Lumesse handles the most basic of functions …
Verified User
Professional
Chose Lumesse (Discontinued)
Each of the above products were more effective than Lumesse. I did not select Lumesse for our company, and would replace it with another system if given the opportunity. Jobvite was the most user-friendly ATS I have used. This system allows seamless integration with social …
PeopleSoft was broader than Lumesse, we integrated Lumesse with Workday and it was a good fit because each did things particularily well, and more effectively than PeopleSoft.
Features
Lumesse (Discontinued)
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.0
2 Ratings
4% below category average
New hire portal
7.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
7.02 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
7.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Corporate goal setting
7.01 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
7.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
7.01 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
7.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
7.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
7.3
1 Ratings
10% above category average
Review status tracking
7.01 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
7.01 Ratings
Reporting
8.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Lumesse (Discontinued)
6.3
1 Ratings
9% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
7.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
7.01 Ratings
Candidate search
5.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
It has open text boxes to add notes, on the individual candidate home page. Which is helpful when making a quick look at an individual, these notes are very obvious.
It has a search function; however it lacks a wild card (*); so if a req or candidate are spelled differently or referred to differently, there is no way to find them
I have found the system to be very inconsistent and "buggy", for lack of a better term. Today I searched for an internal requisition number and the system could not find the data. I found it by scrolling through manually, and verified that I had entered the information precisely as it appeared. There seems to be no explanation as to why it could not locate this particular entry, but I have been able to use the function without a problem in other instances.
The navigation is not intuitive or user-friendly. It takes an exorbitant amount of clicks to accomplish a task. Each action is confusing and time-consuming.
The system requires a large amount of redundant information in order to enter a job and does not auto-populate. If I indicate a position is located in Chicago, it would logically follow that the state is "Illinois", the country is "United States", and the currency is "USD". I have to manually input these details in both the requisition as well as the separate job advertisement page.
Changes to the job requisition are not reflected in the job advertisement, as they are separate entities. If you need to make a change, you have to update the details twice.
Lumesse is an average to abover average ATS in my opinion. We work with Lumesse because they came to us with our new client. I don't have an overall issue with Lumesse like I do with some other ATS's.
Decreased employee efficiency -- There are so many steps to create an entry that our recruiters use the system as little as possible. We had hoped to use Lumesse for centralizing information and reporting, but have not been able to do so. Instead, each recruiter keeps a separate Excel sheet, defeating the purpose of having an ATS in the first place. We only use Lumesse to post to our website now. We are very disappointed.