TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Automox

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AAutomox is an endpoint management solution used to keep desktops, laptops, and servers updated and ready for users anywhere in the world. Using automation, IT can fix critical vulnerabilities and boost user productivity.

    $1

    per month per endpoint

    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/ATrellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
    Pricing
    AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAutomox can patch macOS, Windows, and Linux endpoints with PatchOS, an offering at $1 per endpoint/ month with an annual commitment. The Automate Essentials or Automate Enterprise packages are for scaling IT automation, endpoint configuration, and software updates. Modules are available with Automox Assist, a one-on-one remote endpoint control and assistance for helpdesk technicians.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Considered Both Products
    Automox
    No answer on this topic
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    141 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    132 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    6 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    138 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    105 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    94%
    Implementation went as expected
    130 Answers
    75%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    Features
    AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Automox and Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Feature
    Automox
    -
    Ratings
    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    6.6
    1 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Network Analytics00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management Tools
    Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Automox and Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Feature
    Automox
    -
    Ratings
    Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    30% below category average
    IT Asset Realization00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
    Authentication00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
    Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Web Scanning00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Small Businesses
    Avast CloudCare
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Action1
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Tenable Nessus
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Tenable Vulnerability Management
    Score9.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (126 ratings)
    7.0
    (14 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.1
    (91 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.2
    (6 ratings)
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Automox
    Smaller organisations such as ourselves, who have outgrown their MSP but still need to retain control of their system and have visibility of the estate. The tool enables us to have real-time visibility and deploy or remediate as needed. We have also purchased Rapid7, which integrates natively into the product, making it a more powerful tool moving forward.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    [McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator] seems to be better suited to large enterprise applications... I don't feel it really suits the or self-managed SMB market. The general joe is not going to understand how to wield this product to it's full potential. For those of us managing large networks, this is a very ideal product for managing multiple sites and users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Automox
    • Shows applications installed on a specific asset
    • Able to push policies and updates remotely , creating policies is easy.
    • Keep track of compliant devices and when is the last time they have connected to the servers
    • All the great information provided within one single device
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Static malware scans for known bad processes and files works well and can be schedules on endpoints easily
    • Preventing users from accessing USB drives and other peripherals is easily configured. We can also allow users to access to USB drives with user codes for the times they need it for business reasons.
    • ePO provides access into our MSME software so that we're not managing many different products from different locations.
    • In recent years the console has gotten much easier to navigate even though there is a ton of information to be accessed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Automox
    • Server patching orchestration. There is no way to patch and reboot systems in order of importance, such as database servers before application servers.
    • Worklets for patching .net core and similar.
    • Worklets for removing unwanted Java installs or other unwanted software.
    • Integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management.
    • AI script development should be included at no additional cost; GPT or Gemini can be used instead for free and pasted into Automox. Why charge when others are free?
    • Official worklets are slow to be added or updated.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
    • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
    • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Automox
    This is a software that just works. Once configured its a set and forget kind of tool that keeps things up to date and alerts me if something is wrong. I was able to work through an expansion project to deploy an additional 500 devices in almost no time and create a robust self-patching environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Automox
    It truly functions like a single pane of glass. While our use case is for EC2 instances in AWS, it can manage endpoints across all clouds, or even deployed hardware (laptops). We do manage instances in multiple AWS accounts and there is no set up required between orgs. This accomplishes our needs for real time tracking, and historical reporting for all of our in scope resources.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Automox
    1. Simplicity and Ease of Use 2. Cross-Platform Support 3. Powerful Automation with Worklets 4. Real-Time Visibility and Control 5. Fast and Reliable Cloud-Based Updates 6. Strong Security Focus
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Automox
    Implementing Automox successfully starts with a clear strategy for organizing and grouping devices based on operating systems, environments, or business criticality. This ensures that patching and configuration policies can be applied with precision. A phased rollout approach is essential—beginning with a pilot group allows teams to test patching schedules, reboot behaviors, and custom Worklets before scaling across the organization. Leveraging Worklets from the start can significantly boost automation by enforcing security baselines and performing routine system tasks. Integration with existing SOC tools, such as SIEMs, enhances visibility and response time by correlating patch compliance with threat intelligence. Additionally, aligning patching schedules with operational downtimes minimizes disruptions, and consistent monitoring and reporting helps maintain compliance and prepare for audits. Overall, Automox offers a streamlined and effective solution, but its true value is unlocked through thoughtful planning, testing, and integration with existing IT and security workflows.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Automox
    All of these other products are overly complicated with user interfaces that are not very friendly.. too technical, even for IT pros. They are also expensive for smaller companies or those with limited IT budgets. I've found that these other solutions are really geared for larger enterprises more than small to midsized companies, which is fine... but then they tend to market themselves as good for everyone, when they are really not.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Automox
    • Patches are now fully up to date and we have no longer been dinged for it from our pen testing partners.
    • Reduced man hours spent on maintaining an update server and the hours spent looking at each machine to ensure it patched all software both windows and third party.
    • Allows for us to provide a vendor with a means to connect to our systems without the use of a VPN.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
    • Peace of mind that your environment is safe and secure.
    • Keep your network environment up and running.
    • Additional resources (consulting or training) may be required if not familiar with the product.
    • Very complex to setup and configure ( training may be required).
    • Once configured, it will take care of almost 80% of your tasks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots