Apollo is a $1.6B AI-powered sales platform that helps revenue teams find and engage leads, automate outreach, manage deals, and enrich data. Boasting B2B database of more than 210 million contacts and 35 million companies, Apollo’s end-to-end platform helps businesses of all sizes unlock their full market potential with precision and ease.
With users among 500,000+ companies, including Autodesk, Cyera, and DocuSign, Apollo offers a go-to-market platform to…
$59
per month per user
Zendesk Sell
Score8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zendesk Sell (formerly Base CRM) is a CRM that aims to give reps access to integrated tools that provide the full context of a customer account. This keeps them in the loop and allows them to capitalize on opportunities. Zendesk Sell can be extended with Reach, a lead generation and engagement tool that automates the process of finding and keeping leads interested, so reps can focus more on building relationships and crushing their quotas.
Base CRM was founded in 2009, and acquired by Zendesk…
$19
per seat/month billed annually
Pricing
Apollo.io
Zendesk Sell
Editions & Modules
Basic
$59
per month per user
Professional
$99
per month per user
Organization
$1,188
per year per user
Sell Team
$19.00
per seat/month billed annually
Reach prospecting enrichment add-on (requires a Sell Subscription)
$27.00
Per User Per Month (billed annually)
Sell Professional
$49.00
per seat/month billed annually
Sell Enterprise
$99.00
per seat/month billed annually
Sell Elite
$199.00
per seat/month billed annually
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apollo.io
Zendesk Sell
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
20% discount for annual billing on the Basic and Professional plans.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Apollo.io
Zendesk Sell
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
7.9
17 Ratings
2% above category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Advanced search
7.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Identification of new leads
7.817 Ratings
00 Ratings
List quality
7.717 Ratings
00 Ratings
List upload/download
8.316 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting
7.817 Ratings
00 Ratings
Load time/data access
8.317 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
7.8
17 Ratings
0% above category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Contact information
7.817 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company information
8.217 Ratings
00 Ratings
Industry information
7.516 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
7.7
17 Ratings
4% above category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Lead qualification process
7.814 Ratings
00 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations
7.614 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salesforce integration
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company/business profiles
7.716 Ratings
00 Ratings
Alerts and reminders
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data hygiene
7.215 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic data refresh
7.315 Ratings
00 Ratings
Tags
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
Filters and segmentation
8.516 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
6.9
12 Ratings
8% below category average
Zendesk Sell
-
Ratings
Sales email templates
6.812 Ratings
00 Ratings
Append emails to records
7.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
6.6
15 Ratings
15% below category average
Customer data management / contact management
00 Ratings
8.914 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
6.115 Ratings
Territory management
00 Ratings
4.98 Ratings
Opportunity management
00 Ratings
7.913 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
00 Ratings
6.915 Ratings
Contract management
00 Ratings
5.410 Ratings
Quote & order management
00 Ratings
3.97 Ratings
Interaction tracking
00 Ratings
7.915 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
00 Ratings
7.811 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
9.0
12 Ratings
18% above category average
Case management
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Call center management
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Help desk management
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
6.9
12 Ratings
9% below category average
Lead management
00 Ratings
6.012 Ratings
Email marketing
00 Ratings
7.89 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
5.3
13 Ratings
36% below category average
Task management
00 Ratings
8.013 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
00 Ratings
1.05 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.013 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
8.2
15 Ratings
8% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.812 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
00 Ratings
7.914 Ratings
Customizable reports
00 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
4.2
15 Ratings
56% below category average
Custom fields
00 Ratings
7.815 Ratings
Custom objects
00 Ratings
4.910 Ratings
Scripting environment
00 Ratings
1.16 Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
3.08 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
9.5
14 Ratings
13% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.912 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
4.0
5 Ratings
59% below category average
Social data
00 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Social engagement
00 Ratings
6.95 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
Feature
Apollo.io
-
Ratings
Zendesk Sell
5.4
7 Ratings
30% below category average
Marketing automation
00 Ratings
9.87 Ratings
Compensation management
00 Ratings
1.03 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Apollo.io and Zendesk Sell
The automatic email feature is extremely helpful for quickly contacting more potential clients. It is user-friendly and easy to access all buttons, which helps you navigate the task efficiently. It could greatly help to acquire more clients for a project to be successful. I cannot see anything less appropriate for me to achieve the goal I am aiming for.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Zendesk sell is best for organizations that want a clean and simple, yet powerfully effective CRM tool. It's intuitive, extremely user-friendly, supplies lots of video tutorials and access to the California team for FAQ's, and has all the features other, more complicated, expensive CRM's have. Great for institutions that have a need to tailor their database to fit your needs; and track sales, tasks, and pipeline projects in graphic form. It's affordable and has a great app for mobile phones that allows access to contacts, notes, tasks, and a workable platform while on the go in real time. It's simple to teach new users how to navigate and utilize. Adding or deleting users is simple, and access to the CRM information can be limited/private or made public for the entire team to access. Not as costly as some of the competing products, so if you are on a tight budget this may be the tool for you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sequencing automated email campaigns for outbound prospecting (BD Function).
Integrating with Sales Navigator to help me find emails/phone #' numbers/"add to sequence" while prospecting. It's easy and seamless to find & then load contacts into Cadences.
Integration with Salesforce is a huge plus. Allows me to not worry about logging anything, but the executive team can see my activity & what is going on (emails going out, responses I get, etc.).
The analytics on the outreach data is always helpful as well (open rates, click rates, etc.).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
My favorite piece is the Tasks connected to the Clients OR the Deals themselves that keep the process moving with the right steps, and helps our team from doubling our work, or missing a piece that is crucial for the completion of the sale.
The email integration helps to keep all things housed in one place also, so that you're not bouncing back and forth in multiple platforms to stay on top of the orders.
Customizations are a HUGE part of why we use Base CRM right now. We can make sure we are recording all of the right information, and not wasting time by having to fill in or skip over content that doesn't apply to our business model.
I also like the ability to tied Deals to multiple people, especially as Referrals come across, so we don't forget how we got in touch with different clients.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Apollo.io has an amazing amount of features. It's great being able to complete so many tasks in one space but it's also overwhelming. It took me a few days to work through all of the options when searching for a company or person. After a few days it started to provide companies for me which was confusing before I understood what was happening. At first, I was also confused about what a "sequence" was so maybe some of the jargon can be confusing. I think with time I will become more comfortable once I understand all of the options offered.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I received about two hours worth of training on Zendesk Sell (formerly Base CRM). I will say it's a clean look and the ability to change views is extremely helpful. I do wish there were other features that allowed the views to be more simplistic. Some views can be overwhelming to look at. Nevertheless with the minimum training, I am still able to navigate through Zendesk Sell (formerly Base CRM) successfully due to the ease of usability.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The team wants to solve probelms, but we are finding that they don't know how to solve the more technical issues quickly. I suspect that they don't have a mature process for escalations, and they don't have a usable knowledge base article repository. They seems to push emails around to let us know that people are working on the issues to find solutions, but this takes weeks and oftentimes still leaves us without a resolution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Due to the ease of the product, I have not had the chance to reach out to support yet. I’ve had no reason. The resources provided to clients are extremely helpful and detailed. So far my questions have been pretty basic and I generally just ask my colleague or teammate. They're able to assist with the answer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This product has a great backing of users, but needs more options direct from Base CRM on all operations of the software. YouTube videos do a great job of helping implement, and the back end support is a great help as well. The CRM is a great free option, and should be treated as such.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Make.com, Dripify and Hubspot all seem to have similar systems. However, they don't have any of the data. So, you wind up spending more money and time connecting them all to your system. Zoom Info has great data, but they didn't have automation. Apollo.io allows you to combined all of these other ones into on system which is fantastic.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Simpler than most CRMs, which can be good if your sales team is not very tech savvy. We switched to HubSpot which provides a lot more value than Base did, but it isn't right for everyone. HubSpot is focused on capturing in-bound leads and has its own flaws and limitations, but overall it's a better fit for our needs.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I've only just started using Apollo, but with the 24 emails I've sent out using Apollo, I've already received one response, which is a much better ratio than before.
I was also able to add several companies that were not already in my Salesforce account, which appeared in Apollo.io.
Apollo.io helped me find genuine companies that we could assist through the prospecting filters, which was very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info