Apica vs. OpenText SiteScope

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apica
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Apica is an observability cost optimization provider helping IT teams gain complete control over their telemetry data economics. Apica Ascent processes all observability data types including metrics, logs, traces, and events while optimizing observability costs.N/A
OpenText SiteScope
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText's SiteScope is an agentless application performance monitoring tool with hybrid support across a variety of systems and vendors. Sitescope also offers automated workflow and incident identification and remediation capabilities, and rapid installation-to-monitoring processes.N/A
Pricing
ApicaOpenText SiteScope
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ApicaOpenText SiteScope
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ApicaOpenText SiteScope
Features
ApicaOpenText SiteScope
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Apica
-
Ratings
OpenText SiteScope
8.1
6 Ratings
6% above category average
Application monitoring00 Ratings6.16 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings8.25 Ratings
Threshold alerts00 Ratings8.96 Ratings
Predictive capabilities00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Application performance management console00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Collaboration tools00 Ratings7.34 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications00 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring00 Ratings9.15 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring00 Ratings8.86 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting00 Ratings8.95 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery00 Ratings6.65 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ApicaOpenText SiteScope
Small Businesses
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Logz.io
Logz.io
Score 7.0 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
NetBrain Technologies
NetBrain Technologies
Score 9.1 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ApicaOpenText SiteScope
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(11 ratings)
6.9
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ApicaOpenText SiteScope
Likelihood to Recommend
Apica
As I use this for only my area, it is very well suited to what I need it to do. Apica Synthetic monitors two different web applications in a time interval that is easily customizable for uptime and latency. These are critical indicators for a cloud-based point-of-sale system. We need solid uptime and limited latency across the enterprise.
Read full review
OpenText
SiteScope is definitely well suited in an HP server environment. It is also well suited for virtual server environments. It is also well suited for those who are happy with email and text based message alerting. It may not be appropriate in other environments where monitoring physical components is critical. Because HP SiteScope does not monitor certain physical components, it does fall short of being able to be a "one stop shop solution" in regard to monitoring. It is not well suited for those looking for logic in how alerts are sent and cascade to other people or groups.
Read full review
Pros
Apica
  • Auto alerts trigger if any issue is identified
  • Graphical representation of the health of applications
  • Good product support from the team
Read full review
OpenText
  • Alerts can be configured as per business requirement.
  • It can take remedial action, when defined for a particular situation.
  • Severity, priority of tickets which are created upon a trigger can be well defined.
  • The teams which need to be alerted can be configured in the tool itself, in case of any event.
Read full review
Cons
Apica
  • It's very clunky. Infrastructure is large and very difficult to upgrade.
  • SaaS and On-premise versions are different. There is an LDAP integration but users can only be assigned to one group (i.e. department). If you are in 2 departments, you need 2 separate logins.
  • Update: they now offer federated logins
  • It filled a gap in monitoring for us, but we're looking to move on.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Sitescope is particularly used for infrastructure monitoring. Other kinds of monitors cannot be set using HP sitescope.
  • Sitescope cannot have graphs like splunk which is why we have splunk as well which is an additional cost for the company.
  • We can't have a direct regex operations on data inside HP sitescope. We need to have the logs placed as a single log and then do that.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apica
We trust the results that Apica Synthetic has achieved. Real-time alerting is critical to our clients and with limited resources, we can't handle many false positives; Apica Synthetic is the only solution that provides both of those features.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Usability
Apica
As per my experience while using it. Thanks!
Read full review
OpenText
Very straightforward and easy to use once you get past the short learning curve.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apica
Apica Synthetic is very effective while configuring the account setup for any of the database/UserID.
Read full review
OpenText
Can't really answer this. Setup was easy and no support has really been used at this point.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Apica
Easy for implementation in our Infrastructure, Easy for troubleshooting the issue and Easy to use as well.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apica
We were using different monitoring tools for different requirements (e.g.,Nagios and Checkmk for infrastructure issues) and we were in need of a tool for service and API monitoring for which we were using ThousandEye. But alerts were 60-70% valid irrespective of conditions like network issues. But Apica Synthetic's alert mechanism is a perfect fit for our department. It helped us to reduce unnecessary/false alerts and a number of wrong tickets.
Read full review
OpenText
SiteScope unified console is a powerful tool for operators to easily detect warnings and alerts grouped by its hierarchical organization with real-time status displaying continuously the whole health map.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apica
  • My department is not charged for Apica Synthetic so no ROI, but from a customer service perspective, we can react to an outage and repair it faster than our customers can report the outage.
  • Our vendor's own monitoring tools are not as accurate nor as timely as ours. They rely on us telling them, from Apica Synthetic, that they have an issue.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Sitescope does exactly what it was purchased for. It may take some time to set it up but once its set up it is a rock solid product.
Read full review
ScreenShots