Apache Kafka vs. SAP Integration Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Kafka
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Apache Kafka is an open-source stream processing platform developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala and Java. The Kafka event streaming platform is used by thousands of companies for high-performance data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission-critical applications.N/A
SAP Integration Suite
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Integration Suite is an integration platform-as-a-service (iPaaS) that helps quickly integrate on-premises and cloud-based processes, services, applications, events, and data. It is used to accelerate innovation, automate more processes, and realize a faster time to value.N/A
Pricing
Apache KafkaSAP Integration Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache KafkaSAP Integration Suite
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAccess to free tier services does not expire while there is an active Pay-As-You-Go or CPEA account with SAP. Once a free tier service limit has been reached users have the option to update from a free to a paid service plan in the same account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache KafkaSAP Integration Suite
Features
Apache KafkaSAP Integration Suite
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
SAP Integration Suite
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache KafkaSAP Integration Suite
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Make
Make
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Score 9.6 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Score 9.6 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache KafkaSAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache KafkaSAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
For brokering messages, Confluent Kafka is well suited since it offers a managed solution ready to use. Scenarios where the solution is not very well suited are for example, where pricing is an issue. The solution costs quite a lot for basic usage (for example: for 3 clusters, pricing is above 100k$ a year).
Read full review
The case of the SAP Integration Suite shows outstanding capability in handling huge data, and especially when handling corporate portfolio data with multiple owners. But we have noticed that in the cases of moving data from the older banking system, it is necessary to further refine the system. It does an excellent job of the current credit scoring.
Read full review
Pros
  • Apache Kafka is able to handle a large number of I/Os (writes) using 3-4 cheap servers.
  • It scales very well over large workloads and can handle extreme-scale deployments (eg. Linkedin with 300 billion user events each day).
  • The same Kafka setup can be used as a messaging bus, storage system or a log aggregator making it easy to maintain as one system feeding multiple applications.
Read full review
  • Broad Connectivity: SAP Integration Suite excels in connecting diverse systems, including SAP and non-SAP applications, databases, and third-party services.
  • Pre-built Integrations and Templates:The suite provides a library of pre-built integrations and templates for common business scenarios.
  • User-Friendly Design Tools:
  • API Management:
Read full review
Cons
  • The Kafka Tool is a community-made Java application that looks and feels from the past century.
  • Logging can be confusing. This certainly shows when we have to do troubleshooting.
  • Hybrid scenarios - pub/sub, but there are services in and outside a Kubernetes cluster. Then there are a ~3 options, but only 2 (the harder ones) are production-safe.
Read full review
  • Could be even more business friendly with programming language abstracted
  • Ability to simulate the integration flow instead of a real run
  • Have some kind of an AI-assistant suggesting the optimal design of an integration flow as it's being built (best practice assistant)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Kafka has suited our use case very well so far. Going forward we are planning to expand our platform manifold so the load on Kafka and our reliance on Kafka is going to increase only.
Read full review
SAP Integration Suite is very helpful to us in many ways to manage purchase procedures, stocks, and data of vendors and suppliers. Also, it helps to manage data for service providers. SAP Integration Suite has the tool to conduct training and evaluation. Unique features like the cloud can provide access from any place and by any device is very helpful.
Read full review
Usability
Apache Kafka is highly recommended to develop loosely coupled, real-time processing applications. Also, Apache Kafka provides property based configuration. Producer, Consumer and broker contain their own separate property file
Read full review
It is a user-friendly platform that enables fast setup for new subaccounts, launchpad and applications.
Read full review
Support Rating
Support for Apache Kafka (if willing to pay) is available from Confluent that includes the same time that created Kafka at Linkedin so they know this software in and out. Moreover, Apache Kafka is well known and best practices documents and deployment scenarios are easily available for download. For example, from eBay, Linkedin, Uber, and NYTimes.
Read full review
Support is hard to reach and takes a long time to get a response.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Work with an SAP implementation partner, if possible.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache Kafka is built for scale. From high throughput and real-time data streaming, it has a strong advantage over RabbitMQ with its low latency. This put Apache Kafka at the forefront as the platform of choice for large datasets messaging and ensuring scalability when data scale up tremendously. RabbitMQ however has its strengths in traditional messaging. Routing and message delivery reliability are the bedrock of RabbitMQ and this is where RabbitMQ excels. In my previous workplace, RabbitMQ was of choice as reliability matters more than scale. In two words. Apache Kafka for scale, RabbitMQ for reliability. And for cloud deployment and large dataset messaging in what I am doing now, Apache Kafka is the default choice.
Read full review
We used to have a in house application in Camel and Karaf as a middleware, and after we migrate to S4HANNA we decide to give a try and move to the cloud with SAP Integration Suite, knowing the capabilities and the needs that we have in the company and the projects that were running on premise in our middleware.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive: bursts of traffic on special holidays are easy to handle because Kafka can absorb and buffer all the messages we need to process long enough to let an understaffed set of back-end services catch up on processing. Hard to put a number to it but we probably save $5k a month having fewer machines running.
  • Positive: makes decoupling the web and API services from the deeper back-end services easier by providing topics as an interface. This allowed us to split up our teams and have them develop independently of each other, speeding up software development.
  • Negative: our engineers have made mistakes such as accidentally dropping a few thousand messages due to the CLI being confusing to use, and as a result a customer lost some of their precious data. I'd say that was more our fault than Kafka's though.
Read full review
  • Ability to have multiple integrations across different SAP systems or modules and be able to actively monitor in one place
  • APIs already exist for the different fields in SAP products and are easy to locate
  • Can set email notifications to aid with monitoring and alert business process owners of issues
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Integration Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of