All in One tool to discovery, view & manage your infra
Overall Satisfaction with ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1 used [...] across [the] organization to manage the infrastructure environment to address monitoring issues, [and] perform automation against manual interventions to resolve issues, [and] ticket creations.
Pros
- Discover the whole environment
- Getting granular details about the nodes in the environment
- Dynamic alignment of monitoring applications
- Agentless monitoring
Cons
- Understanding the inbuilt Maria DB schemas and data structure
- Details on the Dynamic Applications Snippets and the associated core Python scripts created on the servers
- Changing any details on the backend [via Database] not reflected in front end [GUI]
- Easily scalable
- Single tools to effectively manage the environment
- Easy to adapt to perform any customization requirements
- Provide options to build a power pack to manage any device type which [is] not provided OOB
- For issues/troubleshooting / identifying any known bug the details from [the] documentation is not useful
- License calculation [is] basically done on [the] count of devices, but SL1 counts even device component as devices
Yes - IBM Tivoli Monitoring & Netcool - Multiple tools & Agent-based tools, lot of effort spent to manage the agent health.
- Manage the OS platform & categorizing them via device grouping
- Creating organizations for each supported customers & align them under the organizations
- Create the monitoring report & threshold reports and share across different stakeholders on regular basis.
ScienceLogic SL1 single tools have the features of all the different IBM tools. [The] main advantage of SL1 is it has Dynamic Applications which provides the benefit of agentless monitoring [capabilities] where it is not provided by any other IBM tools.


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation