Miro is effective for remote teams--less critical for local work | TrustRadius

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

With many team members working remote these days, we use Miro as a digital pin-up tool while collaborating remotely. I particularly like it because we can embed gifs and video content, which you cannot do on a physical wall.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Embed video and gif content
Sketch tool
Drag-and-drop upload/organization

Cons

File types--let us upload more types of video media please
Exporting pages to PDF often just doesn't work

Return on Investment

Harder to integrate with other design and communication tools (e.g., InDesign, Outlook). Sometimes another thing just becomes cumbersome.
Archiving is a taxing process and doesn't fit with our office standards.

Implementation Rating

6

Starting to use Miro works great; closing out and archiving a project is a pain.

Ease of Integration

6

Miro seems redundant when using other design tools such as InDesign.

Collaboration

The real-time aspect of Miro is unmatched. I don't how how we would do it otherwise.

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Alternatives Considered

Adobe InDesign, Autodesk Bim 360 and Adobe Acrobat DC

Real-time collaboration and speed sets it above the rest.

Other Software Used

Adobe InDesign, Rhinoceros 3D, Adobe Acrobat DC

Likelihood to Recommend

When people are remote, Miro is great for digital pin-ups. Less important when we are all together in the office.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation