Polycom RealPresence Immersive Studio Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 9.5 out of 10

Score

9.5 out of 10

Reviews

5 Reviews

Best Choice for Conferencing.

Rating: 9 out of 10

Incentivized

January 17, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Collaboration with the various team members made easy with the implementation of the Poly Studio. It resolved the challenge of connecting with the remote contributors for a better coordinated results on out day to day tasks.

Pros

Small Conference Rooms
Ad-Hock Meetings
Scheduler Room Reservation

Cons

TC10/TC8 be able to sync with the studio directly wired/wirelessly instead of using the network port.
Better Audio & Video controls on the User page

Likelihood to Recommend

Well, suited for Small to Medium Conferance Room in Large Spaces will have to use multiple PTZ Cameras & External speakers for better AV experiance.

Emmanuel Balla

Sr. AV Engineer in Information Technology at City of Coppell, TX (501-1000 employees)

Vetted Review

17 years of experience

Polycom RealPresence Immersive Studio

Rating: 10 out of 10

Incentivized

January 7, 2025

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Sound has always been a major issue as quality is required. This is where Polycom RealPresence Immersive Studio steps in and is more reliable. The noise canceling technology they have is unmatched from any product in the market.

We gave branches setup in different regions as well, this plays a crucial part in making sure devices are available when required and connections are seamless including sharing of content.

Pros

Noise canceling
High quality video streaming
Device support

Cons

Affordable support package
Though they are the best it's not easy procuring product
All in one cloud solutions

Likelihood to Recommend

It beet suited form meeting rooms that are small like huddle meeting rooms to as big as 100 to 200 seater auditoriums but may need one to gave a good budget.

The setup cannot be used fir outdoors events or maybe it because we have never tried it as well as studio streaming setups .

Verified User

Technician in Information Technology (11-50 employees)

Vetted Review

5 years of experience

Polycom RealPresence doesn't command the room like it once did

Rating: 4 out of 10

Incentivized

July 24, 2018

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Presently, Polycom RealPresence is used across all sites of my organization in order to address the need for face to face meetings across multiple geographies and time zones. The intent is that the use of Polycom RealPresence reduces the amount that our organization should need to spend on travel. In addition to resolving the need for face to face meetings, it is also used for review meetings where documents and other media are shared across sites.

Pros

Polycom RealPresence connections are done well - particularly when using a Polycom bridge. This makes it far simpler to facilitate video conferences than in the past, where you were required to know the IP address of the room you are connecting to.
Polycom RealPresence also does a good job of making it easy to share content. In many instances, its fewer than 3 clicks to display content to remote sites.
Polycom Real Presence also succeeds in supporting multiple platforms - I have always been able to get a client for whatever platform I'm using - Windows, Mac, Android, iPhone, etc.

Cons

Diagnosing issues with Polycom RealPresence can be very frustrating, and the tools offered within the client are unhelpful in identifying where the problem is occurring.
Polycom RealPresence performs poorly in organizations that do not have a good amount of bandwidth out to the internet. At my company, we experience poor video resolution, skipping, dropped audio, and more.
Polycom RealPresence does not handle scaling the interface across high resolution displays well. If you are sharing content from a 4K enabled device and the receiving end does not handle 4K, they end up with an image too big to be useful.

Likelihood to Recommend

I find Polycom RealPresence to be useful when having one on one conversations in purpose built rooms for video conferencing. That is where the quality of the product shines. However, I dislike using Polycom Real Presence for any sort of content sharing because of the issues around resolution.If I need to share content of any kind, I prefer to use other teleconferencing solutions.

Verified User

Engineer in Research & Development (5001-10,000 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience

See why we LOVE Polycom RealPresence Immersive Video Conferencing

Rating: 8 out of 10

Incentivized

June 14, 2017

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Polycom RealPresence Immersive Video Conferencing to meet with our development team in Peru, Ireland, and India. It's great to be able to see our team members when working thru issues.

Pros

Clear picture that allows face to face interaction during meetings.
Clear and quality sound for large meetings.
User-friendly.

Cons

Back end setup isn't very intuitive.
Every now and then we get a delay when conferencing and using multiple features.

Likelihood to Recommend

We find it perfect for what we are looking for. The ability to have collaboration meetings with our team members across the globe. I don't like using it during demos or with clients, however.

Verified User

Account Manager in Customer Service (1-10 employees)

Vetted Review

1 year of experience

Loading Reviews List....

Polycom RealPresence doesn't command the room like it once did

Rating: 4 out of 10

Incentivized

July 24, 2018

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros

Polycom RealPresence connections are done well - particularly when using a Polycom bridge. This makes it far simpler to facilitate video conferences than in the past, where you were required to know the IP address of the room you are connecting to.
Polycom RealPresence also does a good job of making it easy to share content. In many instances, its fewer than 3 clicks to display content to remote sites.
Polycom Real Presence also succeeds in supporting multiple platforms - I have always been able to get a client for whatever platform I'm using - Windows, Mac, Android, iPhone, etc.

Cons

Diagnosing issues with Polycom RealPresence can be very frustrating, and the tools offered within the client are unhelpful in identifying where the problem is occurring.
Polycom RealPresence performs poorly in organizations that do not have a good amount of bandwidth out to the internet. At my company, we experience poor video resolution, skipping, dropped audio, and more.
Polycom RealPresence does not handle scaling the interface across high resolution displays well. If you are sharing content from a 4K enabled device and the receiving end does not handle 4K, they end up with an image too big to be useful.

Likelihood to Recommend

Verified User

Engineer in Research & Development (5001-10,000 employees)

Vetted Review

4 years of experience