TrustRadius Insights for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Business Problems Solved
Palo Alto Networks Traps is a highly regarded cybersecurity software that offers robust protection against malware, zero-day exploits, and advanced persistent threats. Its seamless integration with the Palo Alto Suite has made it a popular choice among users. The software can be easily installed and used on various devices, including laptops and virtual desktops. Users have praised Traps for its ability to detect grayware, serious malware, and exploit attempts that may be missed by other antivirus solutions like Windows Defender. One of the standout features of Traps is its ability to prevent the execution of malware without requiring a file to be downloaded, providing enhanced protection for users. This next-gen capability, coupled with its ease of use and strong protection, has prompted many customers to replace their existing antivirus solutions with Palo Alto Networks Traps.
Traps has proven itself invaluable in identifying and quarantining threats, as well as isolating future malware and preventing its spread across the network. By integrating Wildfire and host AV, Traps adds additional layers of security to hosts and aids in detecting unknown and zero-day malware. The inclusion of Traps functionality in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR further enhances security controls and provides deep visibility into suspicious activities and behaviors exhibited by users. Cortex XDR serves as an Endpoint Response tool that enables organizations to quickly identify and respond to events and incidents across multiple devices.
Users have reported that Palo Alto Networks Traps offers advanced anti-malware detection and prevention with a low false-positive rate, minimizing user annoyance while effectively mitigating the risk of malware attacks, zero-day attacks, and APTs. Its organization-wide deployment ensures comprehensive protection for servers, desktops, and roaming users. With Traps seamlessly integrated into the Palo Alto Suite, manual whitelisting and server updates are no longer necessary. Overall, Palo Alto Networks Traps is widely recognized for its ease of installation, seamless integration capabilities, next-gen features, and robust protection against advanced threats.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR is one of several layers we use to secure our endpoint devices. Harnessing the power of AI and machine learning, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR quickly recognizes and stops threats that may have otherwise gone unnoticed. It also offers the ability to remotely take systems offline while still giving you some level of access to perform forensics or repairs.
Pros
Endpoint Protection
Detect and Response
Antivirus
Cons
Interface can be confusing
An "Admin Bypass" feature to proceed with a false detection would be nice
Better out-of-the-box reporting
Likelihood to Recommend
In my opinion, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR is best suited for an enterprise environment that has a knowledgeable IT staff. The interface can be daunting and is easy to get lost under level after level. Although, they now offer "managed detection and response," where their experts monitor and report back 24/7, which could be a great choice for smaller businesses.
VU
Verified User
Manager in Information Technology (201-500 employees)
Palo Alto Cortex XDR has excellent features which strengthen Security for Endpoint, Cloud and Firewall that can be integrated into a single solution. It has the capability for Digital Forensics and Ransomware Protection as well.
Pros
Antivirus Protection
Ransomware Protection
Digital Forensics
Endpoint Protection
Cloud Protection
Cons
Device Control
Drive Encryption
Likelihood to Recommend
Palo Alto Cortex XDR has excellent features which strengthen Security for Endpoint, Cloud, and Firewall that can be integrated into a single solution. It has the capability for Digital Forensics and Ransomware Protection as well. All devices control should be available. Drive Encryption process also should enable instead of Policy governing only.
The trap was easy to install and worked well with the Palo Alto Suite overall. Upgrades are seamless because everything is in the cloud. We use traps on all of our devices, including laptops and virtual desktops. They did this to guard against malware, zero-day exploits, and APT attacks. This gives us the ability to triage/investigate right from the home page. It can disclose Gray ware and other serious malware and exploit attempts that Windows Defender misses. Palo Alto Networks Traps can also prevent the execution of malware that does not require a file to be downloaded. We’ll see in the CortexXDR product that Palo Alto Networks has added Traps functionality.
Pros
Some zero-day exploits, malicious child processes, and maliciously hashed files have been successfully blocked by it.
Analyzing and identifying unknown malicious software on workstations, servers, and mobile devices are made easier with the help of tracking file behavior.
Panorama's integration helps us detect malicious files and traps more quickly and efficiently than other products we've tried, protecting us from zero-day attacks.
Cons
Traps, like all advanced endpoint protection, need to grow in machine learning/baseline protection.
Sometimes, exceptions were made because of legacy or custom software issues, and we encountered a bug in an older version of the agent.
Traps are best for IT environments using COTS reports/dashboards. In environments where custom software and applications are used, Traps necessitate a great deal of tweaking.
Likelihood to Recommend
Malware that doesn’t leave files behind has become widely available. Anyone who can afford to reverse this trend should purchase technology. Application whitelisting isn’t for everyone, and Palo Alto Networks Traps can help. Enterprises looking for a low-affected, next-generation solution with high protection should consider it. PAN Traps is a great product at a reasonable price, and I highly recommend it.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR is used for our in-house as well as roaming users, and we have procured around 200 licenses. With Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR, we are enabling security controls and also getting insights and deep visibility on our users' suspicious activities and behaviors and securing them from advanced attacks like file-less malware, ransomware, etc.
Pros
Malware prevention
Exploit prevention
EDR and XDR
Ransomware protection
Disk encryption (with Bit Locker and File Vault)
Device control features
Analytics
Investigation
Incident management
Forensics
NTA--network traffic analysis
UBA/UEBA--user entity behavior analysis
Cons
Inventory management
Web controls
DLP features
Likelihood to Recommend
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR is best suited for all the scenarios, except for OT or for devices that don't have internet connectivity. Especially for in-house or on-premises users, servers, roaming users, users working from home, or even users using their own devices, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be the best fit as an endpoint protection suite and even as a replacement of current AV.
Palo Alto Networks Traps is used across the whole organization.
Pros
Enforce endpoint security
Anti-malware protection
Anti-virus protection
Cons
Automation and orchestration of Palo Alto Networks Traps agents either via the Endpoint Security Manager or via any automation platforms like Ansible, Python, etc.
Support of Palo Alto Networks Traps agents via REST APIs
Likelihood to Recommend
Palo Alto Networks Traps is very suited for Endpoint/Server detection and response.
VU
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (501-1000 employees)
Traps/now Cortex XDR was being used to provide endpoint protection for our servers and desktops. Traps/Cortex XDR was being used organization wide.
Pros
It does nothing well
Cons
Traps/cortex XDR alerts on wide scale commercial apps that are clearly not malicious
the Cortex XDR console interface is 5 steps worse than simply bad
Frontline support reps are not fluent in spoken English although their written fluency is okay (at best)
Likelihood to Recommend
If I could give a zero, I would. This is a [bad] product with a bad interface. Support is awful and the product doesn't even come close to living up to the sales pitch. Avoid.
It is important to note that the functionality of Palo Alto Network Traps is being subsumed into the larger CortexXDR product. Traps has been a good way for our organization to implement advanced anti-malware detection and prevention with a low false-positive rate and a minimum of user annoyance. It is able to catch things that are missed by Windows Defender, both grayware and more serious malware, and exploit attempts. Palo Alto Network Traps can even prevent file-less malware from running.
Pros
Malware detection without existing signatures
Test detonation of unknown files in the cloud and locally
Prevention of threats that traditional AV can't block
Cons
Deployment of the agent via SCCM can have downstream consequences.
The agent installer occasionally has issues, especially if it is being used for a manual upgrade.
Kernel permissions issues on Mac may require user interaction (true for most AV).
Likelihood to Recommend
Normal levels of antivirus are basically good enough at the free tier. But they won't stop the sorts of threats that are becoming increasingly common online. Even if one isn't the target of an APT, file-less malware is becoming commoditized and anyone who can afford it should implement a technology to stop it. Folks who aren't ready for full-on application whitelisting (including scripts) will find Palo Alto Network Traps a great fit with the relative ease of configuration and low user annoyance rate.
VU
Verified User
Analyst in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)
We had previously used a local server-based agent before Traps. We have a Palo Alto firewall with subscriptions to URL filtering, Wildfire, and threat prevention so the systems were separated. Traps was an incredibly easy install that integrates with the rest of the Palo Alto Suite. I no longer have to whitelist our old agent and update that server. Everything is cloud-based so updates are seamless.
Pros
Cloud-based.
Simple to install.
Cons
Email alerts when issues are found not just a daily summary report.
Likelihood to Recommend
Great for employees that have devices off-site frequently. Easy for a small IT staff to use. Integrates great with the rest of Palo Alto. Works great for Windows and Macs.
VU
Verified User
Administrator in Information Technology (51-200 employees)
Traps was purchased as a response to a virus outbreak that kept cropping up due to still infected systems popping up days or weeks after we deemed the environment clean. It's being used across the entire organization currently and helped us identify that threat, quarantine it and also helps isolate future malware from spreading across the network.
Pros
Traps does a fantastic job at stopping malware before it executes
Traps defends against 0 day attacks better than other products we have tried
Traps isolates malware to that particular host better than any A/V we've tried
Cons
Traps doesn't seem to function as a traditional A/V very well, so it's better as another layer to your endpoint protection
Traps can cause issues with some legacy or custom programs, so exceptions may have to be made
Traps falsely identifies things as malicious at times, this is not often though
Likelihood to Recommend
Traps is a fantastic tool for malware prevention and works great alongside traditional A/V. Integration with other Palo Alto gear is also very nice, as it can tap into other products/tools for enhanced functionality. Traps is great at quarantining malicious code to a single source and stops the spread of malware that uses network shares to spread very well.
VU
Verified User
Technician in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)
We recently replaced Kaspersky with Traps. Great next gen product! Easy to use, easy to manage and fantastic protection. It has saved us from a few users who like to on spam already and we were able to get our whitelist fleshed out in no time for those pesky one-off and in-house built apps.
Pros
Tracking file behavior
low impact monitoring
easy to use console
Cons
To be honest, at this time I don't have any suggestions for you guys. Sales team was great, tech team is great, product has been great. I like the interface.. so no complaints or suggestions yet!
Likelihood to Recommend
Great for any enterprise solution that wants a next-gen, low impact solution with great protection. If your current product is not up to snuff in any fashion, you should look into Traps. Price point is good and the product is truly outstanding in my opinion.