TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Miro Construction Reviews & Insights

Score9.2 out of 10

8,629 Reviews and Ratings

Chat With Us

Contact about Miro

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Miro

Connect with Miro

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Miro so that Miro and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Who Buys & Uses Miro

Based on 8,840 HG Insights installations.

Powered by

Insights from Miro Reviewers

Based on 14 verified reviews published in the last 18 months


Synthesised from 14 reviews | Last Published June 26, 2026


In TrustRadius reviews, Miro is valued by construction teams for its ability to facilitate real-time collaboration and visual planning across geographically dispersed project stakeholders, including architects, engineers, and site managers. Its intuitive interface allows for quick adoption, enabling multiple individuals to work simultaneously on complex project plans and designs, which is critical for rapid decision-making and cross-functional input.

The platform contributes to significant time savings and project planning efficiency, with 4 out of 13 reviewers reporting accelerated workflows and boosted team output. However, its integration with core project management systems like Jira presents mixed experiences, with some finding challenges in seamless data modification and task tracking. Overall, reviewers see Miro as a valuable collaborative overlay that enhances initial project phases but may require workarounds for end-to-end workflow integration.


  • Facilitates real-time, multi-stakeholder collaboration for distributed construction teams
  • Streamlines visual project planning and design reviews across disciplines
  • Intuitive user experience reduces adoption barriers for varied technical proficiencies
  • Enhances communication and alignment for remote site teams and office staff
  • Accelerates project planning and creative workflows, leading to time savings
  • Mixed experiences with seamless integration and data modification in core project management systems like Jira
  • Functions primarily as a collaborative overlay rather than a direct replacement for operational tools
  • Potential for workarounds needed for end-to-end workflow integration and task tracking

Miro Reviews

89 Reviews
ConstructionConstruction42Civil Engineering32Building Materials14

Videos

A great way to collaborate

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

My company has used Miro for collaborative ideation during group meetings, and workshops. I am in a marketing function, and having a way to collaborate on projects is crucial within our team.

We also often have the need to wireframe menu structures, or even pages, and Miro is an easy way for the team to visualize what we are trying to convey in a way that words can't do.

Pros

  • Collaborative work environment
  • Ideation tools
  • One board for all ideas
  • Easy tool for group meetings

Cons

  • Switching between moused items
  • Seeing the whole board without zooming
  • User functionality with zooming and moving the screen

Likelihood to Recommend

I think to keep meetings on track and moving along when discussion spirals, Miro is an extremely effective tool. When you have a group of people on a call and need to keep all ideas in one place, it can be crucial to have a collaborative working tool like Miro.

Scrum Master Perspective

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

As a Scrum Master I use Miro mainly for doing Retros and PI Plannings. We also use it for refining requirements and discuss them to create user stories out of them.
We use Miro also to track our progress through the PI. To do that we use Jira Tickets synchronized with Miro.
We use Miro for Teams up to 10 people, but also with around 150 users during PI Planning

Pros

  • Easy to use
  • Jira synchronization
  • aligning Objects to each other
  • integrating videos, pictures, PDF and PPT

Cons

  • Frames in Frames
  • locking objects inside tables
  • Miro App gets stuck and crashes
  • Organizing multiple open Boards

Likelihood to Recommend

I like to use it for Retros and PI Planning and also for Refinement of user stories and requirements.
As I am Scrum Master of multiple teams I need to have open of 10-20 Boards at the same time which is not easy in the Miro App to organize, as you can not read the title of the boards any more.
Changing the size of a lot of objects does not work very well, especially dots and connection lines get funny sizes
Vetted Review
Miro
6 years of experience

Streamlining marketing strategy with visual collaboration

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I work with teams like sales, design, and product to monitor marketing campaigns using Miro. I use it to map out goals, timelines, and customer touchpoints all in one place. Before Miro, we were using emails and slides, which are difficult to track for us. Now, we can work in real time on the same board. Our main purpose in using Miro is about campaign planning, reviewing campaign results, and sharing updates with stakeholders.

Pros

  • We can work together on the same board at the same time.
  • All our ideas and plans stay in one place.
  • Sticky notes and voting make team decisions easy.
  • It is simple to map out steps and timelines.

Cons

  • You can easily get lost on large boards.
  • It lacks robust graphing and charting tools.
  • Shapes and notes do not always line up neatly.

Likelihood to Recommend

I remember a project where all our different teams were involved in it. I created a board with timelines, KPIs, and customer journey stages, and each team added their input live. We were all able to work together in real time, view the entire project, and leave comments without switching apps, which is why it worked fantastically for us. Everyone benefited from the hours of time it saved, and we made a good profit on that project, for which I was named employee of the month.

Miro - Easy to use digital platform

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Miro for collaboration, especially in international workshops on the website. Thanks to the graphic side of the application, it is easy to prepare, for example, the appearance of a mega menu - several people can work on it in real time, leave comments, create workflow for the user.

Pros

  • Easly cooperation
  • Differnet type of blocks

Cons

  • I can't change the size of fonts in sticks;

Likelihood to Recommend

The appearance of a mega menu - several people can work on it in real time, leave comments, create workflow for the user. It's nice graphic side of the application, it is easy to prepare, and visual for non graphics people. We can created couple of workstream, couple visual in same time.
Vetted Review
Miro
4 years of experience

The best tool for creative and collaborative problem solving

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

My team uses Miro to brainstorm, document infrastructure architecture, discuss ideas, model database entities, and a lot more. Obviously Miro is amazing at process mapping, creating architectural maps, and data models but I believe the most underrated use for Miro is just getting ideas out of your head and onto a system where you can discuss them with others. Of the many tools offered by my company, Miro is one of the most flexible and helpful to drive discussions and map and evaluate ideas.

Pros

  • Mind Mapping
  • Process Mapping
  • UI wire-framing
  • Relational Database Modeling
  • Cloud Architecture Modeling

Cons

  • I find it hard to remember where to find the icons for various cloud systems even though I use them regularly.
  • Clicking and dragging sometimes malfunctions and I need to refresh the page. This happens rarely, though.

Likelihood to Recommend

I would recommend Miro any time someone has the need to collaborate on creative problem solving of any kind. In my opinion it is THE tool for collaborative mind mapping. It is also very good for documenting certain types of things. It is not, however, a wiki replacement. Managing multiple boards that are related to similar topics can be difficult so it should not be used as a wiki replacement or a replacement for whatever document management system you use.
Vetted Review
Miro
3 years of experience

Miro is the new way to perform collaborative process modeling workshops

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I primarily use Miro to conduct process modeling workshops where we collectively define existing processes, redesign exisiting process, or design completely new processes. The tool is very user friendly so it makes collaborating on these types of workshops easy when working with groups that are not collocated.

Pros

  • BPMN 2.0 diagraming
  • Defining RACI tables
  • Collaborating in workshops with people who are not collocated

Cons

  • If Miro had the ability to define objects used in process models (such as a system or database) that could be called upon in other processes housed on other boards it would make it easier to ensure processes are referencing the same objects.
  • The ability to access a defined drop down list of predefined objects when created an object in a process model (mainly for software and databases)
  • The ability to use AI to map out relations between objects that have been defined in process models across multiple boards

Likelihood to Recommend

Highly suited for Project mobilization, strategy development sessions, SWOT analysis, conducting lessons learned workshops, conducting process modeling workshops of many types

Not suited for building out a dynamic layered documentation of a business' enterprise architecture but I see the potential for it to be able to.

The one-for-all tool for visual thinkers.

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I am currently using Miro as my primary work tool.
It's difficult for me to imagine a more open-ended tool, that can supports me in the most important aspects of my work: think visually, keep things organised and share ideas.
Specifically, I use it for tasks as varied as:

· design low fidelity workflows
· generate product feature roadmaps
· plan sprints and keep track of deliverables
· Create product and feature roadmaps
· Facilitate my research interviews
· Run and moderate workshops
· Keep notes organised for recurrencies
· Conceptualise and draft workflows and solutions
· Benchmark competing features and solutions

I am an advocate of Miro within my company, I believe it THE must-have tool if you are, like me, a visual thinker!

Pros

  • Create diagrams for processes
  • Enable rich kanban-style boards with detailed information in each Card
  • Host external information such as PPT, website links, images.
  • Enable curating beautiful layouts
  • facilitate simple wireframe components

Cons

  • more wireframe components, perhaps connecting to existing design systems
  • More detail, capacity to add images to the card details (once opened)
  • More advanced AI capabilities to make sense / agreggate post-its

Likelihood to Recommend

It is excellent for Designers, Product Owners, who need to collaborate on the basis of visual material. This involves running workshops to align priorities, keep a central repository of feature development schedule, illustrate features or workflows, align initial effort estimation, and the like.

Miro has room for improvement in its presentation capabilities. I still need to jump to PowerPoint to narrow down the content and make it shine, also use its more advanced transitions.

For developers, it might lack more advanced, Jira-style capabilities, and while it seems possible, I personally haven't had the chance to enable that option in our organisation.

An Essential for Organizing Creatives.

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Miro as a sort of idea board. We organize all creative things on there to have a virtual whiteboard to illustrate and organize thoughts. This program is essential for organizations with creative types, as it is very expressive and incredibly easy to use. We have used this to plan trips, plot room layouts, and budget, among other things.

Pros

  • Virtual Whiteboard.
  • Organization
  • Ideal Illustrator.
  • Planner

Cons

  • Controls for a regular mouse.
  • Ability to set permissions for specific sections of a board rather than an entire user board.
  • Better Tool Icons.

Likelihood to Recommend

Miro is excellent all around. The interactive nature of the program makes it easy to learn, easy to set up, and even easier to implement. This program is so amazing, I use it for things outside of my company. If you are a creative or just someone who is a visual processor, this program is a MUST for your team.

Miro is a great product for people who like visuals

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use it to collaboratively build out processes and scope ideas in the same live workspace. It reduces the number of 'check in' meetings and keeps things rolling more effectively, as we can add notes and answer questions at convenient times. One team can focus on the now, while uppers and PMs can concentrate on the next steps. It is far better than the disjointed state we were in prior to using Miro.

Pros

  • Collaborative, visual canvas approach to project planning.
  • Bringing tools and resources used by different departments into one shared space.
  • Less... meetings...

Cons

  • Permission management was difficult for my team to inherit (company did not do a great job rolling it out, cleanup always sucks).
  • Not trying to shill too much, but for what we've been doing I haven't had any other real pain points come up.

Likelihood to Recommend

Reducing meetings and making necessary meetings more effective by allowing multiple people to interact with the same shared screen. Notating on the fly, moving cards/notes/whatever around as we discussed priorities and ideas were seamless. Our IT leaders even used it for team management, as some developers would move during different sprints based on specialties and requirements.
Vetted Review
Miro
2 years of experience

Feedback for Miro

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Use Miro to immerse yourself with my Digital Product Squad. We work with several demands in the after-sales area in the construction industry. We do dynamics, research, meetings and minutes of our meetings. It's a great way to brainstorm and vote, as well as make final decisions as a multidisciplinary team.

Use o Miro para fazer imersões com meu Squad de Produtos Digitais. Trabalhamos com várias demandas no pós vendas na área de construção civil. Fazemos dinâmicas, pesquisas, encontros e atas de nossas reuniões. É uma ótima forma de fazer brainstormings e votações além de decisões finais como um time multidisciplinar.

Pros

  • Voting
  • Presentation
  • Time with music
  • Votação
  • Apresentação
  • Tempo com musica

Cons

  • I can't download and put mockups in a presentation. This needs to be improved.
  • Music doesn't always work
  • Very heavy to open some files and crashes.
  • Mockups não consigo baixar e colocar em apresentação. Precisa melhorar isso.
  • Nem sempre a musica funciona
  • Muito pesado abrir alguns arquivos e falhas.

Likelihood to Recommend

Miro is intuitive and easy to use. It is very good for immersion and dynamics in large groups online. It helps with visualization and has good navigation. Some things need to be adjusted, but it is a great application for dense work and for those with many people in the room to solve problems.

O Miro é intuitivo e fácil de usar. Muito bom para imersões e dinâmicas em grupos grandes de forma online. Ajuda na visualização e tem boa navegabilidade. Algumas coisas precisam ajustar, mas é um ótimo aplicativo para trabalhos densos e que tem muitas pessoas em sala para resolução de problemas.

This review was originally written in Portuguese and has been translated into English using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.

Video reviews