#1 most frequent
United States of America
54.9%254 installations of 463
Categories & Use Cases
Media
1 / 10
Screenshot of an automated screenshot
Who Buys & Uses LambdaTest
#1 most frequent
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
29.9%138 installations of 461
“Due to it cross browsing functionality I can test my product performance under different browser including to their version under one roof. Which is one of the great things I have seen and used so far.”
#2 most frequent
Information
20.8%96 installations of 461
“We use it for cross browser testing, testing mobile apps both ios and android on a wide variety of devices, before LambdaTest, we relied on different platforms but they were lacking in many features, api integration to third party apps like mattermost has been like a cherry on cake, as a reactnative dev this has become an important platform to use on daily basis”
#3 most frequent
Finance and Insurance
13.0%60 installations of 461
#2 most frequent
India
13.0%60 installations of 463
#3 most frequent
Canada
4.8%22 installations of 463
Pros
- Extensive cross-browser and cross-platform compatibility testing
- Real device testing on a wide range of Android and iOS devices with real-time logs
- Significant cost savings by reducing the need for physical testing infrastructure
Cons
- Performance and speed issues, including slow loading times and lag during live sessions
- Inconsistent mobile device testing experience, with slow real device loading and scrolling issues
- Limited availability of real-time devices during peak usage periods
Made QAs Life Easy
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We had execution environment issues for multi-environment on our Automation test framework that's where LT's Hyper-execute introduced to run regression on the different environments. As soon as our QA team commit the code, Hyper execute is automatically triggers and starts execution based on the Environment and Browsers and when the execution gets completed report is generated with result. It has the dashboard where quickly user can filter out the failed test and analyze for the fixes to be done
Pros
- Parallel Execution
- Reporting dashboard
- Huge Device support
- Platforms like Android, iOS versions
Cons
- Improve Support to resolve issues quickly
Return on Investment
- ROI is around 65% when compared to the traditional automated execution in our org, drastically the time is saved due to parallel execution
Usability
Alternatives Considered
Sauce Labs
Best Solution for App Testing
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
LambdaTest is the best tool for App testing. We are using it form last 3 years in our organization for App testing in Real Devices. It provides multiple real devices at single place. You can test your app on Android & IOS both devices. They provide more the 1000 devices on there platform. It is very easy to use. Customer support is very good. It saves lots of time and money.
Pros
- Multiple Devices at one Place
- Save time
- Affordable Solution
Cons
- NA
Return on Investment
- Affordable Price
- Easy to Use
- Save Time & Money
Usability
Alternatives Considered
ClickUp, Atlassian Jira and Slack
Other Software Used
Slack, ClickUp
Seamless Experience in Mobile Testing
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
I have used LambdaTest for Real time Mobile testing and Mobile Automation. It is great experience, user-friendly and we can test Android, iOS and iPad. We can reach out to the support team for any kind of help/issues. They are responding in no time and assisting better. We can also trigger automation and we can watch the live mobile screen when we are executing which is great. We can get to know if the test is running or failing for any reason. If we want to check any locator during run time, we have the option to detect the locator during run time. Overall, it's amazing to use LambdaTest and no big issues faced. For configration related and clarity related, I have raised a support ticket. They assisted me quickly and resolved.
Pros
- We can test android, iOS and iPad along with different version
- We can take screenshot and screen recording during real time mobile automation which is helpful for documentation and error reporting
- We can also trigger automation and we can watch the live mobile screen when we are executing which is great
- Parallel Executions possible
Cons
- QR/ Bar Code Scanner functionality
- Interactive with Screens for uploaded apps during runtime
- Sometimes It is hard to use Web page Locators inside Mobile
Return on Investment
- We can test our own app which is used by our internal
- A lot of time saving and efficient with no much tech knowledge
- We can capture images just like real devices which is great
Usability
LambdaTest Review
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
LambdaTest proved very helpful for testing products across multiple virtual devices and browsers. The cross-browser and cross-device functionality made it easier to evaluate real-world behavior and demonstrate accurate product performance to clients, which improved client trust and boosted confidence in delivered work.Use cases and deployment scopeUsed as a tester to validate product behavior on different virtual devices and browser versions under one roof.Applied for mobile app testing on Android and iOS using real devices provided on the platform.Valuable for demonstrating real product visualization and performance to clients, helping to communicate issues and improvements effectively.
Pros
- Virtual devices replicate real device resolutions and behaviors, enabling realistic testing without needing physical devices.
- Virtual browsers with up-to-date versions allow performance and compatibility analysis across browser releases.
Cons
- Deep, low-level debugging can be harder remotely
Return on Investment
- Significant cost savings from avoiding large device inventories.
- Helps build client trust by demonstrating real-world product behavior.
Usability
Other Software Used
BrowserStack, ClickUp, Slack
Honest Opinion for LambdaTest why should you use it
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
As we are a product based company, therefore to thoroughly test our Frontend application, we use LambdaTest. LambdaTest offers testing of application on all types of devices thus ensuring the product quality. The speed of execution of UI Automation suites in LambdaTest is very efficient with minimum drops in network.
Pros
- Emulators : Speed of execution is Awesome
- Network Connectivity : Very smooth/minimal lags/drops
- All Types of features available, Remote browsing of reports as well
Cons
- Can add more devices as per the organisations are taking in use
- Can introduce parallel execution of test cases
- Local Testing can also be made easier while executions
Return on Investment
- Quality of the Product is ensured thus ROI is high.
- Company Specific devices in use, if would have been present then would be much better.
- Manual Efforts & Speed of execution is high thus ROI is high
