Intapp in Palo Alto offers Intapp Time, a legal billing application focusing on managing alternate fee structures and rich information for analysis and optimization.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
C-Level Executive in Information Technology (201-500 employees employees)
Pros
Timers: IntApp Time's timer functions are well thought out and meet the esoteric needs of different timekeeper's styles
Integration: IntApp Time integrates well with our accounting systems.
IntApp Time has been a reliable application for us.
Users perfer the IntApp Time interface to other products.
Cons
Updating the product can be difficult due to IntApp's update methodology.
There is no artificial intelligence capability in the product to assist timekeepers in entering time.
Installation and testing of the product are complicated.
Return on Investment
Obviously, time capture for billing is a vital function. At this time we believe IntApp Time is best of the breed in this regard, though competition is coming.
Recording timekeeping is something all timekeepers hate. IntApp time doesn't do as much as it potentially could to ease this pain, using predictive algorithms for example.
For timekeepers who are diligent, IntApp time provides all the tools necessary to record and closely manage worked time, its primary functionality.
Alternatives Considered
LexisNexis Time Matters
Other Software Used
NetDocuments, Mimecast Enterprise Information Archiving, Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Manager in Information Technology (51-200 employees employees)
Pros
It captures activity on your PC -- e.g. reading an e-mail, editing a document. It can be customized to track other activities -- e.g. if you use a particular PDF tool, or use a particular web site for legal research.
It captures phone activity.
It captures calendar appointments.
It is really low maintenance, and seems to have a very light footprint on the client.
Cons
I'd really like it if there were some way it could capture mobile phone calls, especially on the iPhone.
Long-term maintenance seems a little burdensome. We do not apply updates ourselves, but rather always engage professional services.
I'd really like it if the time entry functionality were simply rolled into the existing product.
Is there a cloud option? That would save us a lot of care and feeding on the back end.
Return on Investment
About 20% of our timekeepers tell us that are finding significant amounts of time that would otherwise forget. Emphasis added that this is a quantitative benefit.
The vast majority of our timekeepers tell us that it speeds and eases the task of recording and entering time, regardless of whether or not they are finding time that would otherwise go unbilled. This is a qualitative benefit.
The product is expensive such that the ROI is certainly favorable, but it could be better.
Other Software Used
Microsoft Office 2016, Skype for Business (formerly Lync), NetDocuments