TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio Reviews & Insights

Score8.9 out of 10

4 Reviews and Ratings

IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio Reviews

12 Reviews

Improves automation with our org

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

It allows us to improve automation capabilities within our organization. It address our multiple business automation related concerns and smoothens the workflow. Creating ansible playbooks requires very deep knowledge of autmoation but IBM watsonx Code Assistant for Red Hat Ansible Lightspeed has simplified it to a great extent

Pros

  • Natural Language Code Genretion
  • Extensive Playbook Generation
  • Contextual maintenance and code maintenance

Cons

  • Incomplete code generation
  • Errors in large codebox

Likelihood to Recommend

We automate multiple tasks at a single go, using their chat style interface, we give large promts and it executes easily
Vetted Review
IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio
2 years of experience

IBM watsonx code assistant for Z boosts mainframe modernization with AI

Rating: 9 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We need to update our applications regularly to keep up with how business is done nowadays and also want to move some of our applications to Java over time because we have a lot of old COBOL code and it's hard to make our applications work well with today's system but it uses AI to change COBOL code into Java, much easier and faster. For specific, well-defined COBOL modules, I can utilize the AI-powered translation to generate a Java equivalent and for critical sections within the chosen programs, watsonx Code Assistant suggests refactoring options. I evaluate these suggestions and apply the ones that enhance code structure and clarity while preserving functionality.

Pros

  • It can automatically revamp specific parts of the COBOL code and very useful when we want to maintain the existing codebase but improve its structure. I can highlight a block of COBOL code and use Watsonx Assistant to suggest ways to simplify and optimize it.
  • Legacy codes, mostly written in COBOL, are cryptic and difficult to understand. Watsonx Assistant analyzes the code and provides insights into its functionalities and dependencies. A great help when working on older applications where understanding the codebase is crucial.
  • A step-by-step approach to modernize our applications slowly and steadily, so that we can control the process better. I don't have to change everything at once. Instead, I can focus on specific COBOL modules and automatically convert them to Java.

Cons

  • It would be better if it could handle complex logic and reorganize critical code more effectively. Like any modernization tool, WatsonX Code Assistant for Z also finds it hard to deal with complicated and highly customized code structures.
  • A simpler and easy to use interface will surely help developers of all skill levels especially, for those who are new to the tool and want to use it more easily and effectively. UI needs an uplift and refinement. I think it's a bit complicated to use right now.
  • There's already an extension available for Visual Studio Code. If we can integrate it with other commonly used IDEs for mainframe development and with version control systems like Git, it will be really helpful for developers. They can easily track changes suggested by the assistant.

Likelihood to Recommend

Legacy applications can sprawl over years of development. I've witnessed the struggle to maintain ageing COBOL applications. Watsonx can automate repetitive tasks like generating boilerplate code or basic functionalities and it understands the code and then refactors it and even translates it to Java to migrate applications to a more modern language. It also can automatically generate basic test cases, accelerating the development cycle and as a force multiplier.

Review based on short term use of IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

It was used in upgrading the version of Java from 11 to 21 in few of the Spring boot applications and custom libraries that were written for internal applications. It doesn't solve business problems exactly as such, it was mostly used for resolving tech debts and improvising existing applications. Since majority of the codebase is having similar tech stack, it has consistent results

Pros

  • Java version update
  • Spring boot applications modernization
  • refactoring some old constructs in code

Cons

  • Better Kotlin support
  • Better performance on large codebases like monolith
  • Custom library understanding

Likelihood to Recommend

It can be majorly used wherever we have standard java (maybe more) applications written in well known frameworks and not too outdated inversion. It doesn't support kotlin that well and is not that versatile. It is not that suitable for custom frameworks built for internal use, general developer productivity like a normal coding agent either
Vetted Review

Nice code generation tool

Rating: 7 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are using IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio as a coding assistant in software development projects.
We use the basic features such as automatic code generation, code documentation, translation etc.
We use it in conjunction with other AI coding assistants such as Claude.

Pros

  • Supports pretty much all major coding languages (Python, C, C++ etc.)
  • The code generated is mostly accurate and not deprecated, as it tends to happen with AI generated code
  • The documentation generation feature works well

Cons

  • IDE integration is not always optimal
  • I wish it could it could generate the code of an entire WEB site based on user specifications
  • I with there was a functionality to generate code based on design documents such as Sequence Diagrams, Database Architecture etc.

Likelihood to Recommend

I think the main features work as advertised, so it is a recommendable product overall. However, just like other AI coding assistants, you need an experienced software engineer in your team to verify, edit and integrate the code generated.
This is not something that will replace software engineers, at least in its current form.
Vetted Review
IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio
1 year of experience

Ibm watsonx code assistant portfolio AI Generation tool

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Tool to write complex code of high quality using prompts. So Coder experience level is not that significant but tool enables one to write the code as desired.
Its an AI tool which has modernized the art of writing code and creating platforms for business. The automation has reached another high showcasing technolgical high.

Pros

  • AI generated recommendations
  • Automation in coding efforts
  • Inetlligent customer care

Cons

  • Integration
  • User Experience
  • Core Coding for complex problems
  • User Experience

Likelihood to Recommend

Enterprise modernization, Governance, risks and complaince can be handled in a standard manner.

Mainframe Transformation Made Easy

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

To modernize the application quickly and efficiently without compromising performance

Pros

  • Analyse
  • Modularization
  • Code generation

Cons

  • calling parameters for generated code
  • detailed test cases

Likelihood to Recommend

Converting batch COBOL
Vetted Review
IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio
2 years of experience

Code assistant for banking

Rating: 7 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Good news customization for Java and intelleju and eclipse
also so it should be useful for developer who write microservices for banking mobile apps and Internet banking

Pros

  • Banking
  • FS
  • Fintech

Cons

  • Plugin for wclipseeclipse

Likelihood to Recommend

Eclipse and IntelliJ plugin
Vetted Review
IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio
3 years of experience

IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio for Z - Good Understanding for Mainframe

Rating: 4 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We POC'd the product for IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio for Z. The use is for Mainframe understanding and modernization. This was to understand how our mainframe components interact and how we can understand what the dependencies are within our different applications. It also provided visual representations that can document what is happening across our pieces. The last IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio piece was done in VSCode to Transform code.

Pros

  • ADDI - Static Analysis
  • Query-able Data
  • Good integration with IDE (VSCode)

Cons

  • The other UIs of the different phases (Refactor and Transform)
  • The usability of the tool and how it can hook into our existing systems.

Likelihood to Recommend

I would recommend for understanding your Mainframe components not for the GenAI piece involved from just my experience. The explanations were not up to the quality we wanted but its deterministic side provided a lot of value for different members of my team. The visuals would be great. I am not sure where it currently stands.
Vetted Review
IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio
1 year of experience

Its a great product

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have a few clients that are running cobol 4.2 and needs to migrate to cobol 6 on many complex codes that they don't have documentation we use IBM watsonx Code Assistant Portfolio to helps them to get what they code makes

Pros

  • get the relations between the codes

Cons

  • I think that the interface is a beet hard to use

Likelihood to Recommend

I think that it can helps on code debugging an also to improve the actuality of the code