Enghouse Interactive Contact Centers Reviews & Insights

Using touchpoint.
Contact center.
Outbound call management

Enghouse Interactive Contact Centers is well suited for organizations with existing Microsoft solutions e.g. Lync/Skype for business infrastructure/Teams, Those who run Busy (1000+ calls/day) OMNI channel contact centres and depend on quality management/Quality assurance. I would say less appropriate for small to medium organizations that do not have existing PABX infrastructure.

We currently use Enghouse ICC (Zeacom) in our customer support call centers. We use it to accept inbound external calls, manage internal calls, and run operational metrics on our call-takers. We also use this solution to monitor team member work activities, as well as manage project times, meeting times, and break times.

This solution checks a lot of our boxes for session management and activity monitoring, but ongoing server and failover struggles remain a detractor for our team's use.

We are a BPO contact center and we use Presence as our omnichannel communications solution. We have inbound and outbound operations. We have email, chat, as well as voice interactions with our client's end user consumers. We have sales, collections and customer service campaigns operating with great results and Presence's stability has been great for our productivity.

Screen recording and call monitoring are great features and on the other hand, workforce management solutions would be avery nice to have. Also scripting is very easy to use and configuring a campaign script takes only [a few] minutes depending on how complex the script is of course.