TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Couchbase Server Pricing

Rating: 8.7 out of 10
Score
8.7 out of 10

Couchbase Server Pricing Plan Options

Couchbase Server does not currently have any pricing plans listed at this time. For the latest pricing information, visit the official pricing page. Available deployment types include on-premise, saas. A free version and a free trial are available for Couchbase Server.

For the latest information on pricing, visit the Couchbase Server official pricing page

Alternatives for Couchbase Server

Comparing pricing options side-by-side gives you clearer context on total cost so you can confidently choose the product that best fits your needs and budget. Compare Couchbase Server pricing to the most common alternatives, backed by TrustRadius buyer data.

What customers say about Couchbase Server pricing

Real feedback from verified users about Couchbase Server's pricing and value

Rating: 7 out of 10

Negative ROI due to high yearly subscription costs.

View full review
Rating: 9 out of 10

This involves increased license cost.

View full review
Rating: 10 out of 10

As a critical realtime enterprise environment, we've purchased premium support, and it is definitely worth it.

View full review
Rating: 10 out of 10

Couchbase is faster and less expensive.

View full review
Rating: 7 out of 10

Better performance for our IoT processing pipeline Cheaper for same data/performance than existing nosql managed cloud db More devops cost due to no managed cloud offering (next best thing is our own...

View full review
Rating: 10 out of 10

Operating at scale, Couchbase tends to be less expensive than major RDBMS solutions, especially once you implement high availability in RDBMS.

View full review
Rating: 10 out of 10

It has a lot of features, Key-Value, N1SQL, Full-Text Search, Analytics, Dashboards, etc.

Couchbase requires an initial learning curve and adaptation of developments as it is a non-standard...”

View full review
Rating: 10 out of 10

N1QL query language (very close to a standard SQL) is great when your application cannot rely entirely on key-value gets.

View full review
Rating: 8 out of 10

It replaced some of the applications' RDBMS backend which helped us save a lot of cost without compromising or in some cases with a better performance, security, clustering and replication factors.

View full review
Rating: 7 out of 10

We are still at the Poc concept, so potentially cost savings.

View full review