TrustRadius Insights for Cisco UCS Series are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Ease of Installation: Users have appreciated the straightforward and hassle-free installation process of Cisco UCS servers, making setup quick and efficient for their IT infrastructure needs without encountering complex configurations or lengthy procedures.
Effective Control Systems: Reviewers have highlighted the robust control systems provided by Cisco Integrated Management Controller, known as CIMC, which empower them to manage servers with precision and ease, ensuring seamless monitoring and control over various aspects of server operations.
Stable Platform: Many users have praised the stable platform offered by Cisco UCS servers, noting consistent performance, reliability, and uptime essential for their critical business operations. This stability contributes to uninterrupted workflow and increased productivity within their organizations.
We have deployed Cisco UCS in King Abdulaziz International Airport, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We use both UCS B-Series blade servers and UCS C-Series rack servers to support a wide range of workloads, including virtualization, enterprise applications (Access Control, CCTV, SQL Server, Oracle, other airport applications). UCS Manager plays a critical role in centrally managing server profiles, firmware updates, and hardware policies, which significantly reduces our administrative overhead. 1- easy to scale 2-easy to manage 3-Save Rack space and power and cooling requirements. Business Use Case: Supporting airport application/Staff/guest users in multiple datacenters. Virtualization, along with vCenter, makes all workloads easy to manage from a single location . One of the current issues we are facing is the VMware licensing, which makes it a more expensive solution.
Pros
Save rack space, cooling, and power requirements.
Easy to scale and expand.
Efficiency is unmatchable.
High availability.
High Throughput.
Cons
More intelligent alerting for environments not fully integrated with Intersight or third-party monitoring tools.
3rd party plugin support.
Interoperability with non-Cisco networking, storage orchestration tools.
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco UCS Series is well suited for Enterprise data centers, offering centralized management of server profiles and policies. 2-Enterprise data center, wherein rack space, cooling, and power are a challenge. 3- Mission-critical application, Cisco UCS Series is well suited, Cisco UCS Series is less appropriate in the following situations: 1. Small SMB (high upfront cost and complexity may be overkill). 2. Expensive solution for a small business. Most cost-effective to use traditional rack servers.
Cisco UCS is the backbone of compute architecture at our organization, it is a single platform that is used extensively for all things Compute, It the standard that is used to deploy any workload or project that requires CPU, memory, hard-drive and high speed processing. We deploy Cisco UCS in both chassis with b-series blades as well as stand-alone c-series servers. These provide converged infrastructure due to unique architecture.
Pros
Some of the highest rated blades and rack servers per the industry benchmark tests
Using Virtual Interface Cards (VIC), one can easily spawn up to 128 virtual NIC and HBA to carve our network and storage configurations, this simplifies extensive need for physical adapters.
Compute, network and storage in to same hardware platform - ease of operations and maintainability.
Concept of Service Profile and Templates - build once, use multiple times
Cons
Demand for power and AI work load requires higher capacity blades
Availability of 100Gb and 400Gb uplink ports for higher bandwidth workloads
inclusion of telemetry functions to pro-actively generate alerts and faults before they affect functionality.
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco UCS is well suited for workloads small or large. Some of the high end blades and rack servers have plenty of punch and power to be deployed for high demand workloads including HPC (high performance computing).
Rack servers are well suited for deploying data base work loads. While chassis solution is well suited for quickly adding and replacing blades within chassis, and for configuring various service profiles based of type of work load and requirements.
We use it to provide virtual server environments, so it's a hypervisor for all of our virtual servers.
Pros
I guess it gives us the capability and flexibility to grow as we need compute and memory. It allows us to easily do that and add resources. I think that's about it. I mean, it does give us the ability to add GPU capabilities if we want to in the future. And it is basically, I would say it's unified so we can pull whatever services we want on it, which is helpful. That's all. I don't know.
Cons
I can't think of any actually. It provides everything that we need to do. I've been using Cisco's equipment for 15 years and it's very rarely has any hardware related issues, so it's been doing very well. I think maybe their API and management could be easier as far as code, but I think it's actually there too. It might be an easier interface to do it.
Likelihood to Recommend
I can't think of any. I mean, basically we have gone from a HyperFlex environment, which we don't need anymore. This allows us to get around the need for a hyper-converged environment.
Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)
Cisco UCS Series was a strong contender for the next generation computing upgrade. The current platform is end of life and out of support. A vendor and product was needed that would address the lifecycle issues that are typical with computing platforms.
Pros
Easily cusomtizable for various workloads
Native tintegration with CIsco networking components
Form and fit is compatible with existing rack systems
Cons
Support for legacy asychronous communicatiosn devices.
Cost per unit is high
More detailed transparency of system MTBF
Likelihood to Recommend
Complete turnkey solutions for customers and programs. Easily can recommend a flexpod that fits the workload requirements,
We have several Cisco UCS Series clusters in out environment. Dev, test, and mutiple production clusters in our primary data center. We replicated production to a secondary site for redundancy. We like to simplified cabling and the integration of the fabric interconnects to network and san connectivity. Easy to set up and upgrade.
We primarily use Cisco UCS Series B 200 with M5 blades to run our VMware environment. ESXi is installed on each blade and managed via vCenter. Cisco UCS Series solves a need of condensing compute in the rack and reducing overall heat, power and space from traditional servers. We use Cisco UCS Series at both of our datacenters and will continue to replace the blades in our chassis until it EOLs.
Pros
Network Profiles
Updates
KVM
Dashboard
Reliability
Cons
Setup
Alerts
Updates
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco UCS Series offers a reliable and easy to manage system. It is almost set and forget for organizations and requires very little changes. Setup and troubleshooting can be confusing with profiles, but can be addressed with time learning the product hands on. Once familiar, everything is much easier. I would recommend the product for any size organization as scalability is very easy with the chassis supporting multiple blades and the fabric interconnects being able to be easily expanded on as well.
Verified User
Administrator in Information Technology (501-1000 employees)
VMWare hosts is the main use case. We have 850 VMs running on three UCS-x chasiss. Some call mamager. Some video servers. It is the bulk of our datacenter compute.
Pros
Reliability
Density
Speed
Cons
Power
flexability
Likelihood to Recommend
best in class
Verified User
Administrator in Information Technology (1001-5000 employees)