TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points (discontinued)

Score10 out of 10

44 Reviews and Ratings

What is Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points (discontinued)?

Currently supported by Cisco, but no longer sold, Cisco recommends migration to the Cisco Catalyst 9100 Family of Access Points, which offer greater performance and flexibility.

Read more details.

Categories & Use Cases

A robust access point for high density of simultaneous users.

Pros

  • High speed gigabit. Supports 802.11 ac wave 2.
  • Control and visibility of wireless network traffic.
  • High density support for connected users.

Cons

  • Very robust but expensive.
  • No reports of problems, errors or defects.

Return on Investment

  • High density support.
  • Maintain a healthy wireless network free of noise and interference.

Cisco and its Hotspots never disappoint.

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We used Cisco Aironet and Catalyst Access Points in every legislative office. The focus was to provide coverage, individually, for each councilor in their room. Ensuring network quality, for web browsing and online meetings and events. We control access in a segmented way, with each room having a unique SSID, with access restricted to only the employees who worked there.

Pros

  • Stable connection
  • Definition of QoS, ensuring quality for online meetings
  • Ease of installation

Cons

  • Cost of access points
  • Support and licensing cost

Return on Investment

  • 33 councilors satisfied with the quality of their wireless signal.
  • Agility in communication and interaction between sectors.

Alternatives Considered

Cisco 3504 WLAN Controller and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN

Other Software Used

Zabbix, Grafana, Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution, Prometheus, Windows Server

Modern and innovative technology

Pros

  • It's very flexible | Flexibilidad
  • It can be used anywhere | En cualquier ubicación
  • Very easy to manage | Gestion
  • Can be used on any device | Cualquier dispositivo

Return on Investment

  • Nothing negative | Ninguno negativo

Alternatives Considered

Cisco Meraki MR Series

Cisco Wireless Access Points

Pros

  • Provides superior wireless coverage.
  • Provides superior wireless connection speeds.
  • Provides useful client connection statistics.

Cons

  • Wireless troubleshooting.
  • Wireless packet capture tool.
  • Great simplicity of configuration and setup (which has been improving over the years).

Return on Investment

  • Have allowed us to become a much more wireless campus.
  • Allows for an easier transition to meeting rooms and other user's desks.
  • Much more convenient than making users plug in an Ethernet cable.

Alternatives Considered

Ubiquiti Networks UniFi and Cisco Meraki Wireless Access Point

Cisco AP’s in a Cisco Shop Make Sense!

Pros

  • Roaming.
  • Mesh environments.
  • Orphan app support.

Cons

  • Spectrum management.
  • Spread spectrum support.
  • Rogue app detection.

Return on Investment

  • Low downtime.
  • Centralized management.
  • Lower level engineering support required.

Alternatives Considered

Aruba Networks Wireless LAN (WLAN)