Aironet 2800 series APs
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
We expanded wireless coverage in our 84 buildings by increasing our AP count from @300 to @1300. The original design was simply for coverage, while our new design is for coverage and density of users, along with bandwidth needs. Most of our APs are either 2802s or 3802s. We also have a stack of 2 C9800-40 controllers, running in HA, to manage the APs.
Pros
- They are rock solid in terms of reliability (we rarely have to replace them).
- They are easily managed from the controller. It's easy to push new settings out, like RF profiles, etc...
- They are fairly easy to install using the included mounting brackets.
- They seem to be compatible with pretty much everything, although occasionally we will have roaming issues with Apple devices.
Cons
- The price point is too high, but that can be said of all Cisco devices. Depending on the company, other less expensive brands like Aruba or Ruckus might be appealing.
- Some of the OSs have been glitchy. Usually these are fixed or upgraded quickly though.
- They are very heavy, so caution must be used when installing them onto weak surfaces.
Return on Investment
- Full wireless coverage to all users and guaranteed performance.
- Wireless is king, so these have helped us keep up with the demand.
- We have been able to adapt to new requirements like increased security, IoT, BYOD, etc...
Alternatives Considered
Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers, Cisco Aironet 3800 Series Access Points, Cisco Aironet 1500 Series Access Points (discontinued) and Cisco DNA Center
Other Software Used
Cisco DNA Center, Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series Wireless Controllers, Cisco Catalyst 9600 Series Switches, Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE), Cisco Firepower 4100 Series, Cisco Umbrella, Cisco Catalyst 9300 Series Switches
