Buffer Review Insights

Score8.4 out of 10

389 Reviews and Ratings

Back to Reviews

Insights from Buffer Reviewers

Based on 6 verified reviews published in the last 18 months

What positive or negative impact (i.e. Return on Investment or ROI) has Buffer had on your overall business objectives?

6 answered

This report synthesizes 6 recent reviews to assess the return on investment (ROI) that reviewers associate with Buffer. A key theme is the perception of Buffer as a cost-effective tool compared to alternatives, with 2 of 6 reviewers explicitly citing increased ROI due to its affordability. However, an equal number of reviewers (2 of 6) report that they have not yet seen a positive ROI, with some specifically noting less engagement on posts made through Buffer. This indicates a mixed experience, where perceived value is influenced by factors beyond just cost, such as engagement levels and the difficulty of measuring social media ROI.

Increased ROI

2 mentions

Two of the six reviewers specifically mentioned that Buffer increased their ROI because it was cheaper than other tools…

Two of the six reviewers specifically mentioned that Buffer increased their ROI because it was cheaper than other tools. One reviewer indicated that the return was 'very well worth' the investment when it was used mainly for scheduling news.

Less engagement

2 mentions

Two of the six reviewers indicated that they have not yet seen a positive ROI. One reviewer noted getting less engageme…

Two of the six reviewers indicated that they have not yet seen a positive ROI. One reviewer noted getting less engagement from Buffer posts for 'some reason'. Another reviewer mentioned that social media ROI is difficult to measure.

Besides Buffer, what other software do you regularly use? How likely would you be to recommend it to a friend or colleague?

6 answered

This analysis synthesizes 6 recent product reviews to identify software commonly used alongside Buffer and assess user recommendations. Beyond Buffer, several other software tools are mentioned by reviewers. Google Drive and Adobe Photoshop were each cited by 2 of the 6 reviewers. These tools were mentioned alongside other software such as Canva, Semrush, WordPress, Slack, Asana, Google Analytics, Adobe Illustrator CC, Atlassian Jira, Figma, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Adobe InDesign, Handbrake Video Transcoder, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Sublime Text, and TradingView. The reviews provide a glimpse into the broader software ecosystems in which Buffer is used, although the small sample size limits broader generalizations.

Google Drive

2 mentions

Google Drive is mentioned by 2 of the 6 reviewers as part of their suite of tools used alongside Buffer. These reviewer…

Google Drive is mentioned by 2 of the 6 reviewers as part of their suite of tools used alongside Buffer. These reviewers integrate Google Drive with a range of other applications for design, analytics, and project management, suggesting its role as a central repository or collaboration platform.

Adobe PhotoShop

2 mentions

Adobe Photoshop is mentioned by 2 of the 6 reviewers. These reviewers also use tools like Canva, Adobe Illustrator, and…

Adobe Photoshop is mentioned by 2 of the 6 reviewers. These reviewers also use tools like Canva, Adobe Illustrator, and Figma, indicating roles related to visual content creation and editing.

Describe how you use Buffer in your organization. What are the business problems the product addresses and what is the scope of your use case?

6 answered

This report synthesizes 6 recent reviews to understand how users employ Buffer within their organizations, focusing on the business problems it addresses and the scope of its use. A primary use case for Buffer is scheduling social media posts, with all 6 reviewers mentioning this capability. Reviewers also appreciate the product's ease of use; 3 of the 6 reviewers specifically cited its user-friendly interface and helpful features like a browser extension for easy content sharing. The tool helps companies stay organized and maintain a consistent presence on social media platforms.

Scheduling social media posts

6 mentions

All 6 reviewers mention using Buffer for scheduling social media posts across various platforms. This functionality all…

All 6 reviewers mention using Buffer for scheduling social media posts across various platforms. This functionality allows users to prepare and automate their social media content, including images and videos. Reviewers indicate that Buffer helps them stay organized and maintain a consistent presence on social media.

Ease of use

3 mentions

Buffer's ease of use is a notable advantage, according to 3 of the 6 reviewers. They appreciate its uncomplicated inter…

Buffer's ease of use is a notable advantage, according to 3 of the 6 reviewers. They appreciate its uncomplicated interface, which makes it accessible even for small startup clients. The browser extension for easy content sharing and the AI assistant that recommends content further enhance the user experience.

Please provide some detailed examples of areas where Buffer has room for improvement.

6 answered

This report analyzes 6 recent product reviews to identify areas where Buffer could improve. Two reviewers (0.33 mention rate) cited issues with connection stability, reporting the need to repeatedly reconnect social media accounts. Another area for improvement revolves around LinkedIn posting capabilities, also mentioned by 2 reviewers (0.33 mention rate). These reviewers specifically noted problems with tagging companies and a perceived reduction in engagement on LinkedIn posts compared to other platforms. Given the small sample size, these findings should be interpreted as indicators of potential areas for improvement rather than definitive conclusions about the product's overall performance.

Connection issues

2 mentions

Connection issues were raised by 2 of the 6 reviewers. These issues include the need to repeatedly reconnect social med…

Connection issues were raised by 2 of the 6 reviewers. These issues include the need to repeatedly reconnect social media accounts, suggesting potential instability in the platform's integrations. One reviewer also indicated that setting up new accounts can lead to errors.

LinkedIn posting issues

2 mentions

Two reviewers reported issues related to posting on LinkedIn. One reviewer noted the inability to tag companies, a feat…

Two reviewers reported issues related to posting on LinkedIn. One reviewer noted the inability to tag companies, a feature that was previously available. Another reviewer indicated that posts on LinkedIn via Buffer do not generate as much engagement compared to posts on other platforms, suggesting a potential area for optimization.

Please provide some detailed examples of things that Buffer does particularly well.

6 answered

This report synthesizes 6 recent reviews to identify areas where Buffer performs well, according to its users. A primary strength lies in social media scheduling, mentioned by 4 of the 6 reviewers. Several reviewers also cited the platform's social media analytics capabilities, though with less frequency (2 of 6 reviewers). The reviews suggest a positive sentiment toward Buffer's ability to streamline social media management through scheduling and to provide insights via analytics, though the small sample size warrants caution in generalizing these findings.

Social media scheduling

4 mentions

A majority of reviewers (4 of 6) specifically praised Buffer's social media scheduling features. Reviewers appreciate t…

A majority of reviewers (4 of 6) specifically praised Buffer's social media scheduling features. Reviewers appreciate the ability to schedule content across multiple major social media platforms from one place, streamlining their social media management efforts.

Social media analytics

2 mentions

Two of the six reviewers highlighted the value of Buffer's social media analytics tools. These users find the analytics…

Two of the six reviewers highlighted the value of Buffer's social media analytics tools. These users find the analytics helpful for understanding content performance and informing future content strategy.