TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Authorize.net Manufacturing Reviews & Insights

Score7.9 out of 10

73 Reviews and Ratings

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Authorize.net are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Pros

Reliability and Established Company: Many users have found Authorize.Net to be a reliable and established payment processing company. They appreciate the high data encryption security provided by the platform, which ensures the safety of their customers' information.

Smooth Workflow for Payment Processing: Users value the smooth workflow offered by Authorize.Net for authorizing, capturing, voiding, and refunding charges. They can easily carry out these actions through API calls or via the online dashboard, making it convenient and efficient for their businesses.

Free Add-On Features: The free add-on features provided by Authorize.Net are highly valued by users. These include fraud prevention filters, a simple checkout system, subscription/recurring billing options, and customer information storage. Users appreciate that these features enhance convenience and improve the overall customer experience.

Authorize.net Reviews

4 Reviews
ManufacturingFood & Beverages1Consumer Goods1Sporting Goods1Medical Device1

Authnet - Reliable, Cheap, Secure

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Authorize.Net as our payment processor for both our in-house bespoke ordering system, and for out online shopping cart in BigCommerce. It replaced another processor, Transaction Express. Authnet provides the features and security that we need while also maintaining a low overhead cost for our company. We haven't been able to beat their fee schedules with any alternatives yet. They've always been very reliable and easy to work with as well.

Pros

  • Very smooth workflow to authorizing, capturing, voiding, and refunding charges. This can all be done via API calls, or through their online dashboard.
  • Their AVS settings for validating credit cards are substantial and have been reliable in ensuring that our customers cards are being used safely and properly.
  • Their uptime and response times are very good in general. The only issues we ever have communicating with their services is when our connection quality is compromised.

Cons

  • Their webhooks that provide automated alerts on transactions, subscriptions, and other events are less than reliable. We had significant difficulty with them not arriving consistently, and when they are missed they can be very difficult to regenerate.
  • It is probably more related to banking guidelines, but it can be frustrating when a customer pays up front for an item on backorder, and then has to cancel their order later. Depending on the length of time, Authnet may not allow the refund to be conducted to the card.
  • I think this is also on the individual card issuer, but some of the errors for card declines are opaque. There are very transparent and specific errors available, but a lot of issuers just provide back a generic "please contact card issuer" instead of giving a reason for a decline.

Likelihood to Recommend

Authnet is extremely good at providing API accessibility for authorizing and capturing transactions. We used their API to connect to our bespoke in house ordering system. This was a critical implementation for us, and was not reliably available from many other providers at that time. They have been consistently reliable and are mostly ahead of the game on implementing important features. On the opposite end of the spectrum, their webhooks for providing automated alerts are very unreliable. We were relying on them to capture information on automated recurring billing events, but they were so unreliable we had to retool the system and completely eliminate the ARB aspect. We resorted to leaning on internal scheduling jobs combined with tradition API calls to make transactions instead.

Authorize.net is a great payment gateway for small to medium sized pure play ecommerce retailers.

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We currently use it as our main payment gateway for our eCommerce credit card transactions. Our eCommerce platform is the Magento/Adobe Commerce platform.

Pros

  • We accept Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express transactions on Adobe Commerce.
  • We use Authorize.net's CIM (Customer Information Management) system to securely store customer credit cards for future orders.
  • Authorize.net's APIs are relatively simple to integrate with other internal systems.

Cons

  • We have multiple eCommerce and traditional retail channels. Authorize.net does not allow us to easily link the different accounts together.
  • Authorize.net doesn't allow us to capture multiple times off of 1 authorization.
  • Authorize.net's customer support is relatively basic.

Likelihood to Recommend

If you are a relatively small e-commerce establishment, then Authorize.net will more than meet your needs. However, if you are a multichannel retailer, Authorize.net's tools may be too basic for your needs.
Vetted Review
Authorize.net
20 years of experience

Authorize.Net Review

Rating: 5 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Our business uses Authorize.Net to process payments online through the catering software Spoonfed specifically. This is the payment processor that came with the Spoonfed software.

Pros

  • Authorizes payment ahead of time (less cards declined).
  • Saves CC info for future orders, by client.
  • Accepts CC from other countries (not just USA).

Cons

  • Authorizations time out/expire and need to be reauthorized.
  • Declines with error codes but without explanation.
  • Difficult to process refunds.

Likelihood to Recommend

This is a pretty basic payment processor—it works acceptably for our application for our catering software, but I might not choose it for more robust applications. At the height of catering, we were processing a few hundred payments daily.
Vetted Review
Authorize.net
8 years of experience

Authorize.net with nopCommerce (eCommerce) framework worked perfect

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I used Authorized.net's payment gateway service for an e-Commerce site with a NopCommerce framework. Before Authorized.net, I used FirstData payment gateway service until we found out that FirstData couldn't do address verification properly. Therefore, the team and I decided to switch to Authorize.net. Ever since, all the online payments are properly processed by Authorized.net and it has even prevented fraud with fake credit card payments. I integrated Authorized.net over a Microsoft .Net C# platform and the integration process was easy.

Pros

  • It worked very well with Address Verification System which we needed the most for our online customers to validate credit card payments.
  • As a technical lead, integration with Microsoft .Net platform is easy for both a sandbox and live environment. I appreciate Authorized.net for its sandbox environment and SDK to test. So I was able to prove the payment integration service to business users.
  • PCI compliance is of utmost importantance for our eCommerce site, but we're not ready yet to implement the infrastructure. Authorized.net has the PCI compliance that we need.

Cons

  • Authorized.net's administration web site UI is very primitive while a lot of web sites are adapting to a modern UI design.
  • Sometime my business users don't know how to use Authorized.net's admin site to manage customer transactions. That's where the usability issues are.
  • I know sandbox is for testing, but sometimes I couldn't test a few scenarios in a sandbox environment. I received a server error and process failed error message with my test credit card intermittently. It is really important for us to test all possible scenarios, and Authorized.net's sandbox is the only environment we can rely on.

Likelihood to Recommend

So far, I'm happy with Authorized.net. Our eCommerce site is running well and there is nothing to complain about it. It is suited perfectly well for us (eCommerce team) to implement a payment gateway integration. It also worked for our business team who don't need to worry about fraudulent [transactions] and implementing a PCI compliant infrastructure.