TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Adaface Reviews and Ratings

Rating: 9.9 out of 10
Score
9.9 out of 10

Community insights

TrustRadius Insights for Adaface are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.

Recommendations

Users have made several recommendations based on their experiences with Adaface:

  1. Invest in Adaface - Many users recommend investing in Adaface as it is seen as a necessity for any organization. The higher accuracy in shortlisting candidates makes it worth the extra cost, and the platform provides maximum value at the right price.

  2. Customize with assistance - Users suggest reaching out to Adaface's account manager or customer support team for help in customizing the dashboard and features. This ensures that the platform is tailored to specific hiring needs and requirements.

  3. Try the free version first - Users suggest trying out the free version of Adaface before making a purchase decision. This allows users to get a feel for the platform and assess its suitability for their hiring processes.

Overall, users find that Adaface makes hiring hassle-free and helps effectively filter candidates. The quality of questions on Adaface has also been noted to stand out compared to other assessment tools.

Reviews

2 Reviews

Perfect screening tool. 5 stars!

Rating: 10 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We have used Adaface psychometric tests, Software testing tests as first level screening.

Painpoints were

1) We needed something quicker and reliable as first hiring step

2) Proctoring features (especially chat gpt protection, video proctoring were a must)

3) Easily shareable test reports since our hiring managers wont be using the platform. So it has to integrate properly with our ATS

Adaface solved all of these and how. I suggest you try it once (they have a free trial, we used it to preview few tests. our hiring managers liked their sample questions. I haven't checked that part but from their words "its the best they have seen"). Since they were happy with the quality we went ahead.

We were able to screen 300 candidates within a week! No issues whatsoever. All candidates were happy with the platform as well.

If you have any doubts, I suggest you chat with their suppor team. They were super helpful ([...] is our contact there).

Pros

  • Psychometry tests
  • Typing tests
  • Software testing tests
  • Aptitude tests
  • Coding tests
  • Excel simulator

Cons

  • Pricing (they are costlier than others)
  • Assignments
  • SAP tests (they said this is in the works)

Likelihood to Recommend

Anytime before in-person interview. Don't waste time doing anything else. Better to go with data. My suggestion would be to send candidates from resume screening stage or phone call stage to Adaface test stage. Candidates who pass are automatically flagged by Adaface. Those candidates take them to interviews. You will save a ton of time this way.

Vetted Review
Adaface
3 years of experience

Adaface Efficiency

Rating: 8 out of 10
Incentivized

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

For skills test

Pros

  • Addressing challenges in the recruitment process
  • Technical assessments on coding and other technical languages with ease
  • Streamlining the process of assessing candidates' skills

Cons

  • Sometimes questions are not elaborated or don't have sufficient material to grasp them properly, due to which candidates cannot understand them properly.
  • There should be the option of providing hints as sometimes, we as recruiters, may require such features to judge a person on a few other factors as well.

Likelihood to Recommend

It simply helps us internally and externally. By externally, I mean we usually do a quick round of initial testing using Adaface, and internally, I mean we are planning to use it as skills assessment tool for our purpose.I am not sure if there is any control over the googlability of questions. Unfortunately, I cannot edit some questions, whose test is not super clear and I would like to correct it. Many candidates say that the test is anxiety-provoking