X Ads vs. Zedo

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
X Ads
Score 5.8 out of 10
N/A
Formerly Twitter Ads, X Ads is a search engine marketing tool built around features such as objective-based campaigns, promoted trends, and in-depth analytics.N/A
Zedo
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$15
Starting Price Per Month
Pricing
X AdsZedo
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Subscription
$15.00
Starting Price Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
X AdsZedo
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
X AdsZedo
Features
X AdsZedo
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
X Ads
-
Ratings
Zedo
10.0
Ratings
25% above category average
Ad campaign creation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ad deployment00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Display advertising00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ad Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Ad Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
X Ads
-
Ratings
Zedo
9.6
Ratings
22% above category average
Ad dashboards00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Ad performance reports00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Ad conversion tracking00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Cross-channel ad management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Ad forecasting and optimization00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
X AdsZedo
Small Businesses
WordStream
WordStream
Score 6.9 out of 10
Google Ad Manager
Google Ad Manager
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
WordStream
WordStream
Score 6.9 out of 10
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Sprinklr Marketing
Sprinklr Marketing
Score 8.0 out of 10
LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
LinkedIn Marketing Solutions
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
X AdsZedo
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
X AdsZedo
Likelihood to Recommend
Twitter is well suited for brands seeking to effectively manage and tweak their advertising campaign, while also interacting in real-time with people who stumble on their ads, thus maximizing optimal result. It is also my suggested ad platform for brands who want to target the younger generation, especially millennials and those born in the 1990s.
Read full review
The vendor needs to fit the client so the reason I worked with them was that they were not too big or too small for our organization. Also, they were more likely to adapt to our workflow which is great as some vendors in this space wanted us to conform to their processes, which was not wanted.
Read full review
Pros
  • Ease of use. It's very simple to add new creative to an existing campaign, or to quickly promote a tweet.
  • Reporting. I appreciate the dashboard that shows how many organic and paid impressions tweets have received, as well as the resulting engagements.
  • Low-lift advertising. The new auto-promote option makes it so I don't have to choose which tweets I want to promote.
Read full review
  • Campaign set up in our ad server at the time, 27/7 Real Media's OAS platform.
  • Post-campaign reporting.
  • Our main point of contact, I believe her name was Nafisa, was extremely friendly and became an extension of the team. She really was fun to work with and professional.
Read full review
Cons
  • Limitation of characters to only 140.
  • While the targeting of Twitter is relevant most of the time, it is not always right and there are some ads that are completely unrelated to the search terms entered.
  • Not as many users as Facebook.
Read full review
  • They had their own ad server and there were regular efforts to get us to move to that ad server which was not industry standard at the time. We already an agreement in place with OAS and also used DFP via agency access but they pushed to use this server and it was not something I really needed to keep discussing with them.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Twitter ads are not the best way for people to promote things because they do not pop out enough on people's feeds.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The tool is ok to use, and ads are becoming more skippable on Twitter, so we are unsure as a company if it's still a good channel for direct response messaging. It does not perform as efficiently as other social platforms for lower funnel marketing. It does well for awareness campaigns that are set and forget, but optimizing for DR is not as efficient when you are trying to manage the ads on the client side.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Compared to Facebook Ads or Instagram Ads, Twitter Ads was more expensive. However, when we only look at the conversions rate of Twitter Ads, it always had way higher numbers, mainly because it is conversation driven and allows for the customer to speak directly to you as a business owner in a 2 way conversation.
Read full review
I worked with a company called Asentech whose core competence at the time was not campaign management. Zedo replaced them and did a great job. I have since evaluated Theorem, OAO and YourBow and Zedo offers as much if not more than those companies.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • One Positive Impact has been that having ads running has increased the number of followers we have on Twitter.
  • Another positive impact is that due to having more followers, we now have more visits to our site.
  • A mixed impact would be that positively, since we have Adwords implemented as well, we can track back the source of our website traffic to being from a social source like Twitter. The negative of it is that Twitter ads does not have the tracking capability and we still need Google Adwords to do so.
Read full review
  • At the beginning of the month, we had a crush of new campaigns to launch and they stepped up their game to get this accomplished. Also, reporting was done very quickly with a lot of insight into campaign optimization.
Read full review
ScreenShots