Verint Workforce Engagement (discontinued) vs. Verint Workforce Management Professional

• Easy to scale up, especially for a company with staff in different locations.
• Real-time adherence, compatible with non-telephony systems, particularly webchat and email.
• Highly customizable system for administrators and resource planners.
• Time off management including automated holidays, shift swap.
• Requires specialist support to get the system working.

Incentivized

For scheduling and staffing purposes. Plotting advance leaves is giving us an overview of our staffing. It's suitable for real-time management as well as it's auto-updating every time our agents change their status. A better view of each and every agent's adherence. I love how it's helping me with my daily scheduling.

Incentivized

• The end user interface and administration is easy to use
• Ease to integrate with Avaya PBX based on my expertise
• The Customer Survey application is excellent and has a well defined architecture to get accurate feedback for a CS representative
• The solution is robust to work with

• User friendly for schedule updates
• Easy standard reporting
• Good integration with Salesforce

Incentivized

• Products need to be able to support current operating system and Java revisions on a more timely basis
• Implementation resources are often in high demand and engaging them often create delays, as they frequently don't use the same resource within the same project and for the same client. Delays occur when new resources need to be educated on information /history between resources
• Project managers need to understand the products better so they can be engaged better with the implementations

• Should better show chart for better analysis.
• Filter is resetting every time I open the tool.
• Some reports can be included or combined in one place.

Incentivized

Honestly, from what I hear from other industry experts, other WFO systems have the same support issues we have with Verint. We know the product and the system is maturing and becoming more stable. The business has no issue with the Verint product and is seeking to grow not only what we have in place today, but are very interested in other products, such as BackOffice Analytics, that Verint has to offer. I would just love to see a stronger partnership with Avaya.

Because it's almost a year and they still haven't fixed the issues we're having in terms of feeding data from Talkdesk OMNIchannel, as promised.

Because its great

Because the data feed for Chat and Email won't work and I can't forecast w/o the feed or I had to manually import data which consumes a lot of time

Because its excellent tool

It's hard to report using their new platform. They ask lots of requirements that I think they can replicate. Or better yet, have a call with their customers to get the ticket resolved quicker

I do not have any key insights regarding implementation of Verint

I haven't actually used any other WFO solutions as yet Verint has been apart of our organization since 2008/9 and i have been managing it since 2013/14. I have looked at alternative solutions in the past but none seem to ever come up to the same standard as Verint in all areas. We recently upgraded from Version 11 to 15.1 so we are still in the early stages of getting to grip with the newer version and all the added functionality.

Incentivized

Verint Monet is user-friendly and so easy to understand even for first-time users. It can be fully maximized not just by admin, but also by agents. Reporting and analytics have been made simple and easy to create an analysis with. It's not complicated to use Verint Monet at all! So far, it exceeds our expectations.

• It has a great ROI in that, if this is setup correctly, it will tie scheduling with adherence and therefore make setting staffing levels a breeze
• Employee efficiency was also up because of scorecards and adherence client which keeps agents on the ball

• Positive in a way [because] we can manage our daily staffing.
• [It helps] planning [the] schedule ahead of time.
• [It would be] best if we [could] customize the interface based on [the] company's aesthetic.