Stack Overflow for Teams vs. Stonly

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Stack Overflow for Teams
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Stack Overflow for Teams is a team knowledge management and Q & A platform for development billed per teammate, featuring roles and permissions, and integrations with popularly used collaboration tools.
$7
per month per teammate (up to 250 teammates)
Stonly
Score 4.6 out of 10
N/A
When users need to explain how a product works to customers, share knowledge with a team, describe workflows for projects, or onboard new employees, Stonly, headquartered in Paris, offers interactive guides.N/A
Pricing
Stack Overflow for TeamsStonly
Editions & Modules
Basic
$7
per month per teammate (up to 250 teammates)
Business
$14
per month per teammate (unlimited)
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Stack Overflow for TeamsStonly
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Stack Overflow for TeamsStonly
User Ratings
Stack Overflow for TeamsStonly
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Stack Overflow for TeamsStonly
Likelihood to Recommend
Stack Overflow
In my opinion, Stack Overflow for Teams is well suited for an organization that is on a hiring spree for the engineering teams. The reason for it is because instead of catering to doubts of new joinees individually, they can be asked to refer to the Stack Overflow and hence will save a lot of time for both new joiners as well as the existing employees.
Read full review
Stonly
Unless you have the time and effort to do this on your own, Stonly is a fantastic tool that helped us communicate with our customers without needing to think about it for too long. It is flexible where needed and we noticed that it is constantly improving as time goes on. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to provide their user's more guidance on how to use their applications or free up some time from the developer's workload.
Read full review
Pros
Stack Overflow
  • Sharing technical solutions to problems we encounter in our internal development environment.
  • Sharing best practices we find in external resources.
  • Discussions on design patterns and conventions we can use in our projects.
Read full review
Stonly
  • knowledge bases
  • company wikis
  • onboarding
Read full review
Cons
Stack Overflow
  • I would recommend an increased engineering focus on the Microsoft Teams integration.
  • It would be nice to make more medals.
  • Easier ways to earn points.
Read full review
Stonly
  • More features around tracking and understanding our users.
  • Sometimes run into issues with development and connecting with existing components, which may require rework on our end to get up and running.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Stack Overflow
It's easier to use Stack Overflow for Teams Q&A to maintain our knowledge base over time, over the Confluence wikis that we also maintain. You don't need to bother about folders, filenames, templates - just ask a question and answer it or get it answered. It feels less formal, so developers feel more free to add content.
Read full review
Stonly
Intercom and Gist are more focused on Live chat, but the knowledge base is part of their offerings. I love that Stonly is really fleshed out and offers deep features built around the customer education experience.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Stack Overflow
  • It makes the search for answers more efficient, so devs can focus in more important things.
  • Knowledge is not lost, even if people leave the company.
Read full review
Stonly
  • Improved time to market for supporting documents.
  • Provided a way for our content team to be autonomous.
  • Helped us think more outside the box on how we tell user's about our new features.
  • Helped migrate outdated users to our new applications.
Read full review
ScreenShots