PeopleGoal vs. Reviewsnap

• Easy implementation with minimum budget.
• Ambition to drive change in people management.
• Reduction of heavy clunky processes and systems.

Incentivized

Quick adaption came from the ease of use and that is why I would recommend it. If you need more robust cascading goal capabilities you might have to work at it

Incentivized

• A performance transformation.
• Complete visibility.
• Stand-out customer service.
• Attributable top-line growth through active people management.
• Designed with customer challenges in mind.
• Clear roadmap for continual improvement.
• Simple yet effective.

Incentivized

• Trigger automatic reminders for review completion.
• Organize feedback in specific areas of focus.
• Quickly view team members that are due for review. Great UX.

Incentivized

• Every feedback has been taken into consideration with continual and quick implementation to better the system.

Incentivized

• We've experienced challenges beginning new review cycles without old cycles not being closed out
• The UI is OK, but nothing special (a new version has been released, but we've not upgraded yet)
• We currently don't have any sort of integration between ReviewSnap and our payroll system for hires/terms. I'm not sure if this is possible or not but wasn't discussed when we implemented it.

Incentivized

The system is very user friendly and your folks will use it very smoothly.

Incentivized

I reviewed about 8 solutions at the time of making the decision to go ahead with PeopleGoal. It was a process that took me 3 months to ensure we are making the right choice with PeopleGoal.

Incentivized

Reviewsnap has been comparable to most the systems I've used in the past. I wouldn't say that one of the systems I've used and mentioned above sticks out far above or below the others.

Incentivized

• Without sharing numbers, it has contributed significantly (50%+) on topline growth as a result of active tracking and focus on deliverables and clarity of communication, etc.

Incentivized

• It's saved us a lot of paper and confusion. We used to use a lot of paper to track reviews from all over the organization. Now we use Reviewsnap to keep track of reviews and to use old reviews as reference when discussing goals.
• The cloud-based system is great due to the fact that we have satellite offices around the US. You can even do a review from Alaska if required.
• Initially the customer service was great and responsive during deployment. Once the deployment was complete, the HR director reported having a hard time contacting support.

Incentivized