NetSuite is a suite of ERP and accounting modules which is sold in various editions aimed at different size customers. The multi-country, multi-currency version is an additional module called OneWorld. Netsuite is a SaaS system and is not offered in an on-premise edition.
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
QAD Adaptive ERP supports the core business processes and operations of global manufacturers, reducing the number of required add-ons and thereby lowering software costs. The platform is presented as ideal for medium to large-sized companies. QAD Adaptive ERP focuses on the six industries QAD serves: automotive, consumer products, food and beverage, industrial, high-tech and life…
N/A
Pricing
NetSuite ERP
QAD Adaptive ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
NetSuite ERP
QAD Adaptive ERP
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Users subscribe to NetSuite for an annual license fee. The license is made up of three main components: core platform, optional modules and the number of users. There is also a one-time implementation fee for initial setup. New modules and users and can be added as a business grows.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
NetSuite ERP
QAD Adaptive ERP
Features
NetSuite ERP
QAD Adaptive ERP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
1.1
15 Ratings
147% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
1 Ratings
33% above category average
Pay calculation
1.013 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
1.010 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
1.39 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
9.2
74 Ratings
19% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
27% above category average
API for custom integration
9.264 Ratings
9.92 Ratings
Plug-ins
9.947 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
9.7
81 Ratings
17% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Single sign-on capability
9.762 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.880 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
9.9
72 Ratings
31% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
3 Ratings
32% above category average
Dashboards
9.971 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Standard reports
9.970 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Custom reports
9.970 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
7.9
275 Ratings
2% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
10.0
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Accounts payable
8.4269 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Accounts receivable
8.4248 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.926 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.928 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
9.341 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
9.935 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
9.937 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
9.1
48 Ratings
14% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.3
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Inventory tracking
10.047 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Automatic reordering
8.928 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Location management
9.635 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
9.4
220 Ratings
18% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.0
4 Ratings
13% above category average
Pricing
9.953 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Order entry
8.0216 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.937 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
9.548 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.921 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
7.9
216 Ratings
5% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.4205 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
9.927 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
9.831 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
8.927 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
9.935 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
6.6
32 Ratings
14% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
6.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
6.023 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
6.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
4.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.913 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
6.922 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
4.1
17 Ratings
51% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
8.914 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
3.311 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
3.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
3.68 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
3.1
12 Ratings
82% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
3.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
3.3
19 Ratings
71% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
3.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
1.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
3.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
3.613 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
9.913 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
3.1
11 Ratings
71% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
3.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
1.911 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
3.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
3.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
3.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
3.1
17 Ratings
73% below category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
2.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
2.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
2.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
9.914 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
2.511 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
9.4
16 Ratings
24% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
9.2
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Production Process Design
8.912 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Production Management
8.914 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
9.910 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Work Execution
9.912 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
8.914 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
NetSuite ERP
8.4
141 Ratings
17% above category average
QAD Adaptive ERP
8.3
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Forecasting
8.817 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Inventory Planning
8.0138 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
8.914 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Best suited for mid-market to lower scale enterprises (under 2,000 employees) especially if migrating from Quickbooks or another fragmented small business system. Also, multi-entity and global operational businesses are very well suited as there is robust functionality around multi-subsidiary, multi-currency and multi-tax controls. Finally, businesses with inventory & supply chain heavy businesses would find the functionality very useful as the system allows warehouse management, lot/batch tracking, fulfillment, etc. Not well suited for startups (a lot of functionality not needed) or very small businesses (under $3mm in revenues). Overkill in complexity and cost and implementation leg-work is necessary relative to the underlying operations of the business. Also, companies with a heavy manufacturing business (shop floor execution) lacks depth with true manufacturing ERPs like Epicor, Infor, etc. and companies expecting consumer grade UX feels like the interface isn't modern or very intuitive right out of the box.
If you're setting up operations where you have to manage manufacturing builds from raw components to finished goods, I would recommend QAD. It's nice to have subassemblies part numbers for your builds and enter in the number of accepted quantities and rejects. QAD is very helpful if you have a lot of parts floating around. I would not buy QAD if you only have to manage less than ~20 parts... just use Excel.
The QAD Enterprise application is great, we only started using this application a few years ago. The Master Scheduling Workbench has been a great improvement to our daily operations.
The Web-based QAD Supplier Portal has also been implemented recently in our company and has been a huge help to our purchasing and materials department.
The QAD support that we receive has helped our company grow and is a major asset in upcoming projects.
The area for the largest improvement needed is the implementation process. Especially when it comes down to an accounting based ERP setup rather than a CRM model. The experts should have accounting backgrounds in addition to the system knowledge for implementation.
There should be more training focused on the Dashboards and the maneuverability of the data focused for each graph or report within the dashboards.
The AP system is a little problematic with more complex company hierarchy. Due to the AP Invoice headers being driven by "main line" but the expense distribution being driven by journal entries - the AP aging is hard to verify the accuracy and can be distorted by different types of transactions.
Needs more flexibility to add/configure new indexes (if using the Progress Database) as the current indexes on key tables like transaction history are not helpful
Need a better support system for the TMS/Precision interface
Need better KnowledgeBase articles to understand the innerds of Pricing functionality
NetSuite is able to cover all of our needs, spanning multiple departments and managerial levels. We use it daily for a multitude of functions, including creating promotions, estimating inventory, pulling historical reports, forecasting sales, and more. Overall, we're very satisfied with NetSuite as an ERP solution and recommend it to medium to large businesses.
The cost / benefit of changing to a different ERP will create a high cost and low benefit that's why I believe that we'll continue renewing QAD for a long time.
NetSuite is a cloud tool, and is easy to implement for mid-sized organizations. It comes with standard forms/ printing layouts, and financial reporting (both summary and detailed), which are very handy for business users. In addition to these, with 99.99% service availability, NetSuite makes it one of the most reliable ERP tools available on the market.
It has been very reliable. I can only think of 1-2 times in 4.5 years that we have had issues getting in, and in each case were able to get back in within 1 hour. There has not been a major downtime
Most of the time the performance is very good. Pages load in a few seconds; financial reports take less than 5 seconds; basic searches take a few seconds. But performance can be sporadic throughout the day and cause the run time to triple.
I would like to give 8 rating for NetSuite support and reason for that is below: Whenever we faced any technical or functional issues we tried to reach out to NEtSuite support but response was not immediate. We told them about the urgency of the issue but still we were not getting response on time. Then, we have to reach out to AE to get things resolved.
I had in person training for a day when first got the software. The training was good. The challenge was that there was a large gap between training and when we went live so we forgot quite a lot
I felt NetSuite Professional Services did an excellent job of guiding us in the implementation. I also felt our internal teams were a little resistant to the change and engagement of new software. Had we performed better engaging and buying into the new software, I would be able to rate the implementation better. Therefore, the lower number should not be viewed as a deficiency with the software or the professional services teams, but as an reminder of how important complete buy-in from the local users is.
QuickBooks Online is, by far, a better and easier-to-use product for smaller companies. Only switch to Netsuite if you have to. We switched to NetSuite because we have numerous subsidiaries, and QuickBooks would not be able to handle the complexity.
QAD is very easy to use once it's set up. It's basically an Excel sheet that can handle a lot more data points and faster. It's nice that you can dump the data stored in QAD to a CSV file and analyze in Excel. Careful narrow down the data searches to a limited number of points or Excel will crash. QAD is much easier to set up than Arena and SAP. And the numbering systems you can create in QAD is more customizable.
We have been able to scale our business 25X without any major overhaul with Netsuite. Its dashboard setup makes onboarding new employees very easy and allows data to be shared across multiple offices. Its cloud setup does not put any pressure on IT to scale servers or other infrastructure. We have been able to become much more efficient in all aspects of the business.