TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Power Apps

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/APowerApps is a low code / rapid application development product from Microsoft that allows users to quickly build apps.

    $20

    per month per user

    SAP Build

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ASAP Build is a business application development and automation solution with a comprehensive suite of low-code, pro-code, and generative AI tools. SAP Build is for developers, IT professionals, and business users/citizen developers who want to create and customize business applications.

    $1.82

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Power AppsSAP Build
    Editions & Modules
    Power Apps Premium
    $20
    per month per user
    SAP Build Process Automation - Standard User
    $1.82
    per month per user
    SAP Build Process Automation - Advanced User
    $15
    per month per user
    SAP Build Process Automation - Attended Automation
    $534
    per month
    SAP Build Process Automation - Unattended Automation
    $534
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Power AppsSAP Build
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Power AppsSAP Build
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    SAP
    Chose SAP Build
    SAP build is easy to use compared to MS Power Apps
    Incentivized
    Chose SAP Build
    We are also using Uipath for RPA automation; I believe it works better for complex processes than SAP Build, but its functionalities are limited to RPA. SAP Build also offers functionalities around Workflow, which is lacking in Uipath. So, it is still OK in processes like …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    96%
    Would buy again
    51 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    15 Answers
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    40 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    50 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    79%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    31 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    82%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    87%
    Implementation went as expected
    39 Answers
    Features
    Power AppsSAP Build
    Low-Code Development
    Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Power Apps and SAP Build
    Feature
    Power Apps
    8.8
    21 Ratings
    5% above category average
    SAP Build
    7.9
    51 Ratings
    6% below category average
    Visual Modeling9.519 Ratings8.344 Ratings
    Drag-and-drop Interfaces9.520 Ratings8.742 Ratings
    Platform Security9.520 Ratings8.648 Ratings
    Platform User Management9.020 Ratings8.247 Ratings
    Reusability7.720 Ratings7.247 Ratings
    Platform Scalability7.519 Ratings6.750 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Power AppsSAP Build
    Small Businesses
    Zoho Creator
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Zoho Creator
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AppSheet
    Score9 out of 10
    AppSheet
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    OutSystems
    Score7.3 out of 10
    OutSystems
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Power AppsSAP Build
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (23 ratings)
    8.6
    (55 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.6
    (52 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.7
    (6 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Power AppsSAP Build
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    PowerApps is well suited for "quick-wins" and fast prototypes of business solutions. It also is beneficial for situations where business partners and developers work together - it allows the business folks to provide a "quick-and-dirty" prototype which is then fleshed-out by developers that are trained experts on the platform. The interactive and easy to understand representation of the solution allows business partners to "see" the solution and add, remove, or correct aspects of it themselves. It provides a common view and understanding of the actual solution across business units and tech teams. PowerApps, being a low-code\no-code platform is not well suited for business processes that require many complex computations or large amounts of custom code - such as solutions that are better architected as Web Site or "full-blown" desktop solutions. There are solutions that are just not easy or quick to accomplish in a low-code\no-code platform. Enterprise Architects should know the difference, however business partners often try to create a solution and only when stuck because it becomes too complex do they engage a tech team for assistance - at which point there are sunk-costs involved and hinderences to re-platforming the solution
    Read full review
    SAP
    SAP Build is a strong and reliable partner with a rich FAQ and consulting power. New features make sense and are easy to distribute within the team and to end users. The community is nice, and there are many discussions on product development, shared solutions, and productivity improvements. UI is also one of the strongest points.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Power Apps has formats that are pre-built that don't require any coding which makes it easier to achieve your vision. This does become a challenge if your App needs don't fit into that format.
    • We deal with a ton of data so the fact that you can connect to any data source in addition to their pre-stablished data connections makes the process a breeze.
    • The online learning resources and tutorials are helpful as well for those who are tech savvy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Its drag and drop editor is even simpler than the very popular WordPress
    • No code feature to build any type of website
    • Not a lot of technical expertise is required to use this tool
    • The client loves it as they can themselves use it for quick tweaks
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • More complicated to understand in comparison with Nintex Forms.
    • Complicated to find errors.
    • Using PowerApps for SharePoint Forms is a bit complicated by setting up the start and load scenario with a lot of JavaScript.
    • Load values, change them by code, and save them back could be easier. Actually quite complicated to handle a lot of variables.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • Comparing to other RPA Tools, SAP Build automation lacks enough user guidance.
    • Licensing is a little bit confusing.
    • From a technical perspective, older versions of the automation part are not always stable, but the other services (workflow, business rules, apps, etc.) are much more stable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    PowerApps is a great solution and I have spent the last year familiarizing myself with the platform and building custom applications to complete a whole range of tasks such as asset management, custom invoice generation, and item restriction tracking. We as a company have barely begun to scratch the surface of what can be achieved with PowerApps.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    The SAP Build Apps is definitely getting better, however it is still not as easy to use and complete as some other solutions. This makes it a bit harder to use for Functional Consultants for example. SAP Build Process automation on the other hand is so easy, that everybody can build processes in it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    The community forums are extremely responsive to questions asked, there is a good body of online documentation and many community posts to draw from. Although the platform has changed, which means some of the posts are out of date and the solutions provided aren't relevant. Of relevance, I read over 400 articles plus documentation to get this first app built in SharePoint, move it to SQL and make it work exactly the way it should.
    Read full review
    SAP
    There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Much cheaper, much more customizable, and easier to use. There is not much of a learning curve and the licensing cost is much cheaper. PowerApps does one thing very well, whereas other platforms are mediocre. There is much more customization possible for your in-house workflows that you can build yourself vs using NetSuite engineers to build it for you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    Bubble.io is more user-friendly in comparison with SAP AppGyver. The latter being practically a free tool provides enough functionality to achieve results though while Bubble.io doesn't let you export your projects without a paid subscription. Bubble.io has great initial tour and tutorial integrated into the platform that can be handy for any new beginner while SAP AppGyver can be a little overwhelming.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • It has given us a focal point for development. We now have the possibility of connecting to mobile and the default SharePoint online interface isn't always easy to manipulate. PowerApps has given us an opportunity to improve our user experience.
    • An improved user experience has given us a better shot at compliance. When users don't fight the environment, they don't gravitate towards workarounds or non-compliance.
    • As lists and libraries change, the platform scales pretty well.
    • Having users with the capability to create their own forms and tools has dialed back the app dev need (there is a balance though) and distributed power to the process architects and people who actually need the solutions in the first place—much more efficient model of service delivery: self-service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    SAP
    • After using SAP Build we were able to develop products 20% faster than earlier
    • It has also increased our revenue by 15%
    • Our developer team is using this from past 1 year and we were able to reduce the churn by 10%
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    SAP Build Screenshots

    Screenshot of The SAP Build Portfolio, which includes:
1- SAP Build Apps to create business application
2- SAP Build Process Automation to automate end to end business processes
3- SAP Build Work Zone to design and create business sites