TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Playwright

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AA cross-browser testing tool, playwright supports all modern rendering engines including Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. Users can test on Windows, Linux, and macOS, locally or on CI, headless or headed. It is also cross-language, so that the Playwright API can be used in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, .NET, Java. Test Mobile Web. Native mobile emulation of Google Chrome for Android and Mobile Safari. The same rendering engine works on the Desktop and in the Cloud. Playright…

    $0

    WebdriverIO

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AWebdriverIO, an OpenJS Foundation project, is a next-gen browser and mobile automation test framework for Node.js. It can be run on the WebDriver Protocol for true cross-browser testing as well as Chrome DevTools Protocol for Chromium based automation using Puppeteer.N/A
    Pricing
    PlaywrightWebdriverIO
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    PlaywrightWebdriverIO
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    PlaywrightWebdriverIO
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Open Source
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    PlaywrightWebdriverIO
    Small Businesses
    LambdaTest
    Score8.6 out of 10
    LambdaTest
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    LambdaTest
    Score8.6 out of 10
    LambdaTest
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    LambdaTest
    Score8.6 out of 10
    LambdaTest
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    PlaywrightWebdriverIO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    PlaywrightWebdriverIO
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Playwright is works pretty well for automating the critical user paths of any web application, ensuring that core functionalities are constantly tested and catching issues before they reach QA, particularly through its seamless integration into our CI/CD (in our case, using GithHub); however, it is less appropriate for mobile testing since it doesn't support mobile applications. Testers still needs to learn another framework to do this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Best suited where frontend developments are in React and where BDD and TDD test frameworks are to be used. Its syntax is very easy to write and understand. Even the non-programmer can do the initial setup. Not suited when the language you are using is other than Javascript(or Typescript).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • API
    • UI
    • Performance
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • numerous integrations to tools
    • fast easy location of page elements
    • tool setup is amazing - they have a script to walk you through everything with prompts!!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • bigger adoption
    • mobile testing
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • wdio.conf can contain too much where everything is encapsulated there, like the before and after functions
    • A data provider-like testing would be useful. The only way to input different data into the same test is via a loop
    • everything is needed to be done using the 'browser' object. Can be limiting where you don't have access to the browser depending on where you are in the code
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    It makes automating complex user interactions easier, fits right into our CI/CD for continuous testing, and works great across different browsers. The Documentation is a plus, you don't really need to search a lot to understand and find what you need for the coding. The community is small but very helpful, which makes it a breeze to use and a must-have for keeping our software in top shape.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes all the basics to start writing using that spec as a placeholder. Compared to Cypress, Playwright support multiple browsers out of the box, giving us broader testing coverage. Appium is great for mobile testing, but extremely slow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Other tools we selected don't work in our application, it does or doesn't support multiple frames or need more tweaking just to make it works. When testing out WebdriverIO it just works as expected, no need to do such walk around to make it works multiple frames. It also can handle multiple tabs and windows.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Usable
    • customisable
    • extendable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • It helped in cross browser testing
    • It helped in automating multiple browsers at a time.
    • Code coverage is optimum as this supports Javascript(Typescript)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots