Playwright

Playwright

Playwright

15 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Playwright	Score 7.6 out of 10	N/A	A cross-browser testing tool, playwright supports all modern rendering engines including Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. Users can test on Windows, Linux, and macOS, locally or on CI, headless or headed. It is also cross-language, so that the Playwright API can be used in TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, .NET, Java. Test Mobile Web. Native mobile emulation of Google Chrome for Android and Mobile Safari. The same rendering engine works on the Desktop and in the Cloud. Playright…	N/A

Pricing

Playwright

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Playwright
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Best Alternatives
	Playwright
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Playwright
Likelihood to Recommend	10.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Playwright
Likelihood to Recommend	Easy to code and help in sanity regression and functional test cases Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Pros	API UI Performance Incentivized david leo Developer Read full review
Cons	bigger adoption mobile testing Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	It makes automating complex user interactions easier, fits right into our CI/CD for continuous testing, and works great across different browsers. The Documentation is a plus, you don't really need to search a lot to understand and find what you need for the coding. The community is small but very helpful, which makes it a breeze to use and a must-have for keeping our software in top shape. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	We selected Playwright over the rest for several reasons. The learning curve is faster, making it easier for our team to get up to speed quickly. The setup is pretty straithtforwared, minimal configurartion needed and a great example included in the configuration which includes all the basics to start writing using that spec as a placeholder. Compared to Cypress, Playwright support multiple browsers out of the box, giving us broader testing coverage. Appium is great for mobile testing, but extremely slow. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Reduce of cost of manual testers Reduce of released bugs Reduce of costs of developer time Increase QA Coverage Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots