TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Teams

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.

    $4.80

    per month per user

    Pigeon Messengr

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ABased in New York City, Pigeon Messengr is a business communication platform that offers teams the flexibility to communicate their way. Pigeon Messengr provides businesses of all sizes with an integrated suite of communication tools to help streamline business communications. Employees can text, chat, set up video calls or voice calls, have private or group discussions, and more! The platform connects conversations across voice, video, and messages so you can pick up right where you…

    $7

    per month

    Pricing
    Microsoft TeamsPigeon Messengr
    Editions & Modules
    Microsoft Teams Essentials
    $4.80
    per month per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month (paid yearly) per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $7.20
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $15
    per month per user
    Starter
    $7
    per user
    Professional
    $14
    per user
    Business
    $25
    per user
    Enterprise
    $40
    per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft TeamsPigeon Messengr
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.Pricing is per user per month. Contact Pigeon Messengr for more information on pricing for your team.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft TeamsPigeon Messengr
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    ZooOps
    Chose Pigeon Messengr
    I used Teams in a previous role and definitely find Pigeon Messengr easier to use. Messengr's chat UI is easier to use; it's easier to follow threads and participate in groups. However, as I mentioned previously, I wish the notifications worked better in Pigeon Messengr.
    Incentivized
    Chose Pigeon Messengr
    Price and ease of use were major factors in our decision to work with PM.
    Incentivized
    Chose Pigeon Messengr
    Great price, great UI, and isn't owned by the evil overlords at Google and Microsoft, etc. Easy to setup and migrate our team to and we were up and running in a single day.
    Incentivized
    Chose Pigeon Messengr
    Pigeon Messengr is the best of all of these apps, rolled into one. Why use 2 or 3 when there's one that does almost everything you need? I will say that depending on your memory and OS, some of these alternatives might run faster than Pigeon Messengr. It has caused a few …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    89%
    Would buy again
    201 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    11 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    180 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    202 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    11 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    91%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    115 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    7 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    139 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft TeamsPigeon Messengr
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Microsoft Teams and Pigeon Messengr
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    4.4
    192 Ratings
    54% below category average
    Pigeon Messengr
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management5.1147 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts3.476 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling4.1162 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation4.0101 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access5.5184 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search4.4169 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools4.4118 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Microsoft Teams and Pigeon Messengr
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    5.9
    201 Ratings
    29% below category average
    Pigeon Messengr
    9.2
    11 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Chat5.9200 Ratings9.811 Ratings
    Notifications5.3199 Ratings8.111 Ratings
    Discussions5.7187 Ratings9.710 Ratings
    Surveys5.0112 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase4.3122 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook9.1156 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Microsoft Teams and Pigeon Messengr
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    5.0
    186 Ratings
    44% below category average
    Pigeon Messengr
    8.0
    10 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Versioning5.1130 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files4.4158 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Audio files5.0160 Ratings8.010 Ratings
    Document collaboration6.0173 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control5.3156 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features4.0117 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device sync4.7132 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft TeamsPigeon Messengr
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Flock
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Microsoft Viva Engage
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Keep
    Score9.9 out of 10
    Google Keep
    Score9.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft TeamsPigeon Messengr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    5.8
    (278 ratings)
    8.6
    (11 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    3.7
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    5.6
    (62 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.3
    (113 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    6.3
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Professional Services
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft TeamsPigeon Messengr
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Positive: The virtual workspace created for a work team within the same company, for the resemblance of information and communications in one place.Negative: The access for members of a non-profit organization who have external emails from the host but need the same access as an internal person since their volunteer work is part of the very core of the federation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    Pigeon Messengr functions well as a general communication tool. In my experience, the only area it is not well suited for is transferring documents with specialized file formats. I also am not aware of what its auditability is like, but we are using it so it must be there.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Virtual meetings - ease of set up and execution
    • File sharing! We build channels for projects, and being able to invite only project members is huge!
    • Peer-to-peer communications - being able to "ping" one of my colleagues, either text, video or call-only, on-demand, is what runs our business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    • Notifications - I can minimize the window while I'm working and new messages will pop up on my screen so I don't have to remember to check the channel.
    • Statuses - we always put up a status of what we're working on, I like how you can hover over user names and it will show you their statuses.
    • Overall look - I don't know if my company chose the color scheme but it's really sharp. Also love that I can use Dark Mode, easier on my eyes for sure!
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • The feature of notifications in the mobile application could be improved. Sometimes notifications of different teams are not visible and are only visible when the application is opened.
    • It uses lots of computational resources while running and thus, slows down the system sometimes.
    • It allows a few channels per team. The number of channels could be increased for better productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    • Sometimes a message will get broken up and I am unable to view it all at once.
    • It would be nice if it had a way to select a message as being unread. I like to leave messages unread as reminders but sometimes need to just read them first.
    • It won't allow me to upload a picture because it has to be of a very small size. Would be more personal if I could use a picture on my profile.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Microsoft
    User experience has been much better than the previous Skype for Business app. It has an easy-to-use interface with persistent chats. The search feature is very fast and useful. MS Teams has mostly focused on Collaboration and team building features which are very useful for organizational communications. Since Teams is accessible from multiple platforms like Laptop, Desktop, Mobile phones, etc it has been very convenient from a Mobility perspective.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    Rare, but outages do happen
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    I've never had it be not available.
    Read full review
    Performance
    Microsoft
    Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    Occasionally, files can take forever to upload and download, and the calendar integrations also don't work sometimes.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    Using Microsoft Teams has resulted in much faster business communications with both co-workers and consultants. There has been little need for support with this software as the interface is very intuitive and the product is overall very well designed. We did encounter an issue with the built-in phone service, however, this was quickly resolved by the support team.
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Our company and IT department previously used Skype for our communication needs. Skype was not dependable in my opinion, because it seems each time I used it during a call and/or a meeting, I and several other team members would get disconnected more than once. This caused a great interruption of our meeting, caused team members to have to ask others to repeat themselves and caused a general lack of interest in employee attendance during meetings.
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    Pigeon Messengr has everything in one, although there are some things that could be improved, what product doesn't? I prefer it over some of the other platforms because it is more organized for our business needs and communications, and it has several updates a month to make sure everything is working properly.
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Microsoft
    Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    I have not noticed any issues for a company of about 400 employees. I imagine the channel functionality would enable fairly unlimited scaling.
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Microsoft
    I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • I'm not sure I can point to a specific ROI, but it has improved our ability to communicate and work more effectively together.
    • It's also nice to have records of every interaction, photo, and document that has been shared. Less chance of something completely disappearing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ZooOps
    • Positive - less time wasted on emails
    • Positive - less expensive than having a chat tool and a video tool (and phones!)
    • Negative - sometimes tone is hard to convey in text, and this has led to a couple of misunderstandings
    Read full review
    ScreenShots